Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Cohen - Bill Clinton's Secretary of Defense - was a Republican

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:56 PM
Original message
Bill Cohen - Bill Clinton's Secretary of Defense - was a Republican
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:56 PM by theboss
The defense rests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rests on what???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. On, um, victory
I'm on the record for wanting to give one of the useless cabinet posts to Huckabee. However, I would never ever in a million years give one of the important posts to a republica - State, Defense, Treasury, Transportation. Bill Clinton turned over the Pentagon to a Republican.

So, any complaints from the Clinton camp should be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. OK
Thanks for the reply

Just curious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. What if Barack Obama had a Republican somewhere in his Cabinet?
Does the defense rest there too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't have a problem giving one of the stupid Cabinet positions to a Republican
Just not Defense, State, Treasury, or Transportation.

Clinton gave an important one to a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. When did transportation become such an important post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The last time I visted an airport
That's when it became important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Well, the country got by without a Dept. of Transportation
until 1967. It's really NOT one of the major cabinet posts - not at all like Defense, Treasury or State, even Justice. Those are the big four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Fair point. I stupidly left out AG.
AG should esily be off the list.

The ones I don't consider absolutely crucial are:
Labor
Energy
HHS
HUD
Agriculture

In the past, I would not have considered Education crucial, but NCLB changed that. If NCLB is repealed, I would put it on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Well, that depends on what people think is important as far as cabinet positions.
For instance, I'm pretty sure a lot of poor people would be pissed if the Secretary for Housing and Urban Development was a Republican with an eye on privatizing its functions, neither would there be happiness if you had a Republican running the Dept. of Education wanting to gut its operations as well. The only Republicans that I would personally consider would be Lincoln Chafee-like Republicans, but those are truly rare indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. HUD's never worked
I'm not sure that department could be screwed up at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's bad, but as they say, don't toss out the baby with the bathwater.
Section 8 Housing is a successful and continuing program run by HUD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. My parents car was stolen by residents of Section 8 Housing a few years back
Not the biggest fan of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Well, personal experiences may vary. It helped my family get on its feet.
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 07:48 PM by Selatius
Big fan of it, as a result. Situations like this is why the saying "don't toss the baby out with the bathwater" was coined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. And did Section 8
make them steal the car? I'm not understanding the leap of logic you're making here.

I was robbed by High school kids once. Doesn't mean I oppose paying for high schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Wow.
My parents live in Section 8 Housing. Without which they wouldn't survive. We're not rich folk, but we sure the fuck aren't criminals.

I'm more than a little appalled at your statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. There are some bright and honorable Republicans.
And if one or two might be of help in the cabinet, fine with me. Especially fine if they happen to currently serve in the Senate. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. timesonline is a BS site, don't believe it until a reputable news agency covers it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. That was his effort to try to mend fences between the parties.
I actually think Cohen was a decent Sec. of Defense. He was a REAL middle of the roader then and he still is. He's one of a VERY FEW Pubs I can stand to listen to when interviewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlotta Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bill Cohen was a moderate Republican, Hagel isn't
Other than his war stance, this guy is a Neanderthal

# Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
# Rated 100% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance
# Rated 0% by the HRC, indicating an anti-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)
# Rated 11% by the NAACP, indicating an anti-affirmative-action stance. (Dec 2006)
Rated 36% by the NEA, indicating a mixed record on public education.
Rated 17% by the CAF, indicating opposition to energy independence. (Dec 2006)
Rated 0% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)
Rated 100% by the Christian Coalition: a pro-family voting record. (Dec 2003)
Rated 92% by CATO, indicating a pro-free trade voting record. (Dec 2002)
Rated A by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record.
Rated 12% by APHA, indicating a anti-public health voting record. (Dec 2003)
Rated 8% by the AFL-CIO, indicating an anti-union voting record. (Dec 2003)
90% conservative voting record; 95% support of Pres. Bush. (Dec 2006)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thurston Howell III Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yes...what's your point here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. My main point is that I'm a dick
My secondary point is that Obama is simply suggesting following in Bill Clinton's footsteps.

And that makes it rather tough for a Clinton supporter to criticize.

"How dare he do exactly what we did? Bastartd!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Ah, well, it is understood that DUer's *hate* Bill Clinton with an unbridled passion, yes?
I would think they hate then, by extension, all his good and/or even reasonable ideas as well :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC