Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apparently, HRC wants us to wait three days for TX caucus results?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:53 PM
Original message
Apparently, HRC wants us to wait three days for TX caucus results?
Are they hoping to delay the inevitable announcement that she LOST?? So she can continue her lies of winning Texas for 3 more (24 hour) news cycles?


http://www.star-telegram.com/local/story/504829.html


"I think they're afraid of what the caucus results might be," said Obama campaign strategist Steve Hildebrand. "This is the game they play on the eve of every election. ... They like to suggest that the process is unfair to her."
<snip>

State Rep. Jim Dunnam, D-Waco, leader of the Democrats in the state House of Representatives, accused the Clinton campaign of trying to "stoke fears or promote cynicism" by raising questions about a process that has been a feature of the presidential nomination process in Texas for decades.

The law requires the caucus results to be reported within three days, but the intense interest in the results prompted the Texas Democratic Party to invest $60,000 in a voluntary reporting system so that the media and public would have an idea about how the caucus tallies were breaking.

Obama officials see no problem with it. But Mauro said the system would produce "flimsy, half-baked results." Still, Mauro said there were no plans to challenge the legality of the voluntary reporting system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. This reminds me of the shit her campaign tried to pull in
Nevada. Desperation. Please Hillary, if you lose Texas, QUIT!! It will save the party and the money Obama will need to defeat McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. New Mexico. Remember how long it took for them to finally tally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I meant about the lawsuit to halt the caucuses in the casinos
After the big union there supported Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. We'd still have the Primary results, right?
Obama will probably be the winner either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. But why should we have to wait for the results?
This is nothing more than a political ploy by a desperate Clinton campaign that is flailing about trying to find anything that might stop Obama. And so far they haven't found it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, we shouldn't have to wait.
My point was, it does HIllary absolutely no good in her campaign to do this. I don't think they actually will. They also won't sue in Texas. THey are nearing an exit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. READ THE ARTICLE--OP IS DELIBERATELY WRONG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Cuz she can't stomach giving 3 concession speeches in one night?
Don't think she has to worry about it, though, because all eyes will be on Obama that night...I look for the channels to cut her off mid-excuse, er, I mean mid-sentence so they can show Obama's speech in Texas (it's been reported that he is spending Tuesday night in Texas).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, Hillary wants people to vote. Most democrats wouldn't have a problem with that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What does that have to do with the OP? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:22 PM
Original message
The OP is griping about her not conceding before the results are in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. They want to delay until they can get the Rhode Island results in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. How many concession speeches will she have that night, anyway?
Didn't even think about that part of it...let's see, a good chance THREE (Ohio, TX, Vermont), one for each lost state!

Can we wrap this up early in the evening, HRC..just give ONE concession speech that says you are dropping out of the entire primary race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. she's afraid of having another huge loss publicized n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. *******there is NOthing in article saying they want a delay. CORRECT YOUR HEADLINE PLEASE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Texas bylaws say that caucus results must be reported in 3 days from the caucus
The Texas Dem party spent $60,000 on a volunteer 'reporting' system to release results the night of the caucus.

Hillary's campaign is against this saying the results would be "flimsy". They want the results to be reported on Friday.

If she wins the primary but loses the caucus, this gives an illusion of "winning Texas" and 3 news cycles before the other shoe drops and is reported.

It really isn't that difficult to understand if you read the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Yep...so we would get a Friday news dump
a la-chimp style. Right out of his play book...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary will never be electable for ANYTHING after all this is over!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
easy_b94 Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. yes!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. lol!l (i agree) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Mark Penn: "let Rhode Island decide". ALL HAIL HILLARY! QUEEN OF RHODE ISLAND!!
The dynasty continues... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I thought Iowa, err I mean super tuesday, err I mean the Chesapeak, err I mean Texas, err I ....
mean Ohio, errr I mean Pennsylvania was going to decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hillary doesn't like the rules, so she wants to change the game. Nevada, part deux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. And how, exactly, does Hillary plan to "bake" the results??
Shades of New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC