Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dayton to Hillary (I just sent Hillary a letter)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:59 AM
Original message
Dayton to Hillary (I just sent Hillary a letter)
I can't wait for the debate! Does everyone have popcorn?

I just wrote Hillary with the following suggestion for a line at tonight's debate. If it shows up, you heard it here first!

Example of my sinker line:

Barack: "blah blah blah (I'm in show business) blah blah blah you don't want her blah blah voted for a war which should of never happened!!"

Hillary: "Well, I wish I could go back and vote present instead of making a difficult decision, Barack."


A one line refutation!
:)

Love,

MCyoulata


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. My take
Hillary: "Shame on you"

Barack: "I'm rubber you're glue"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. FLAMEBAIT



......How about...Sen Clinton when will you say....I'm Sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. A day before Texas and Ohio
She'll get on every network, start crying and start saying she's sorry. Just a hunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Typical low level comment from a Obamafolk. Shameful.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 09:16 AM by rodeodance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not only a good line, but a true one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. She's not going to do it. That would sail over the heads of the
vast majority of viewers. I am really hoping she does go for his jugular tonight. Voters hate her when she does. It's great for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ok
I want her to go after him too. He was on a stage with Richardson, with Edwards, with Clinton. Hardly fair, people. Must be love or something... I just don't get it: why the hell do people like him again? This is for the manager of the Oval Office, not the host of the Ocscars, that we're voting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. LOL!
If she does, she will probably get booed.



Peace:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean627 Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. YEP, sure is.
If she can't see by now that every time she attacks Obama and his supporters her support goes down, what does that say for her intelligence, or lack of intelligence.

Appears to me it is the philosophy of "keep making the same mistake over and over and HOPING for a different result".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Unless
it wasn't ever a mistake to begin with, and people were just in love with Obama! I personally think it's just infatuation, and after they realize he's been cheating on them with Drudge, they'll backlash. I just hope it's not too late for Hillary, who earned the right to be campaigning with 35 years of hard work for YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. That was many obamafolks wet dream last week also. She is too classy for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. He could explain that it would have demonstrated the superiority of the Illinois system
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 09:17 AM by karynnj
Every Democrat who indicated trouble with the bill as written could have voted Present. Many would have needed no change to their statement. They would be saying that they wanted to give Bush the backing he needed in negotiations, but they though the bill had too few checks and balances. The reason this was a tough vote was that most Democrats - on either side - were no, buts and yes, buts. Other than the Democratic sponsors and a few very hawkish Democrats - there may have been few "Yes" votes.

It would be a perfect way to genuinely explain that system. It would also have the ability to correct any view that the Democrats were equally eager to go to war - very few were. It would not eliminate the vote as an issue because the issue is that McCain could use it. A great way to take the high ground - kill this present issue - and reframe which party has been strongly for the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Sweet
If it's so superior, they should be able to vote present in the senate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. very nice post
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why would she say that? She's not sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. changing the topic won't make the OP go away..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Ha ha---good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. It sure is...
He'll be at a loss for words and end up mumbling and stumbling for sure...AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. If you don't mind
I'm going to copy your post and hand it directly to her today if I am able to get close enough. She will be in our neck of the woods today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean627 Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Glad to see Hillary's supporters
are trying to help her continue to commit suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thank you for your concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. She might as well take free advice. That $4 million dollar man has proved worthless. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. YOU GO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Tell her Ohio still has her back!
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 09:18 AM by susankh4
And IN/KY/PA/RI.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Yes we do! I'll add your pic and the positive message it sends
thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. That is from the Cincy Rally!
I believe it was in the AFT section.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Do it
I just sent it to her. I mean, I'd like to see every Democrat that voted yes on the war line up and say they wouldn't have voted present if they could have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. I've copied it
Thank you. If I can't get it to her directly I will give it to one of her campaign staff....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Si se puede!
Ohio is all about Hillary. I haven't taken a poll and I don't believe in them. I see what I see on the street, and there's not much Obama mania here unless you turn on the TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. Don't you mean you xeroxed it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
27. I hope she does
will make her look pretty foolish. bring it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:48 AM
Original message
Not quite as foolish as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
34. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 09:52 AM by yourguide
"change you can xerox" really brought the house down too.

mark penn, is that you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Well I believe we all should know by now
how utterly rude Obama sycophants/cultists can and will be don't we? Y'all remind me of the "children" selling flowers on street corners and in airports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Ok old timer
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 10:06 AM by yourguide
if you cant accept that the torch has passed, choose to stay in your warped state of denial...it doesnt bother me, but your reality will come crashing down on March 4th.

Considering how many HRC supporters I have seen tombstoned lately I think "Ya'll" might want to reconsider your own rudeness.

Yup, I've heard a countless number of people compare the teamster's to "children selling flowers on street corners and airports". :sarcasm:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
36. I need to paste that
everywhere.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Did he also "collaborate" with Edwards?
Once a shyster, always a shyster..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pqutz5ASDSA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. there will be bamboozling
Did Malcom X endorse him ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. there will be bamboozling (link)
Did Malcom X endorse him ???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuB_W8o_UsU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. It's funny how this stuff...
keeps getting recycled, as if on cue, isn't it?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/opinion/16mikva.html?ex=1360818000&en=9417ee6115534086&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
Present’ Perfect
By ABNER J. MIKVA
Published: February 16, 2008
HILLARY CLINTON should probably be forgiven for not remembering the course on the state Constitution that she would have had to take as an eighth grader in Illinois. But had she remembered it, she would have known that Senator Barack Obama was not ducking his responsibility in the Illinois Senate when he voted “present” on many issues.
Unlike Congress and the legislatures of most other states, each chamber of the Illinois Legislature requires a “constitutional majority” to pass a bill. The state Senate has 59 members, so it takes 30 affirmative votes. This makes a “present” vote the same as a no. If a bill receives 29 votes, but the rest of the senators vote “present,” it fails.
In Congress, in contrast, a bill can pass in either the House or the Senate as long as more people vote for it than against it. If 10 people vote in favor and nine against, and the rest either vote “present” or don’t vote at all, the bill passes. It can actually pass with just one vote, as long as no one votes no.
In the Illinois Senate, there can be strategic reasons for voting “present” rather than simply no. A member might approve the intent of legislation, but not its scope or the way it has been drafted. A “present” vote can send a signal to a bill’s sponsors that the legislator might support an amended version. Voting “present” can also be a way to exercise fiscal restraint, without opposing the subject of the bill.
I recall voting “present” on many bills when I was in the Illinois Legislature. In the 1960s, for instance, I voted “present” on the annual highway appropriations bill. Like many of my fellow senators, I thought some of the money being allocated should have gone to public transportation. Still, I didn’t want to vote no, because I did not want to stand against the basic principle of maintaining our public roads. So I voted “present.”
It never occurred to me or to any of my critics that I was ducking responsibility for a making a decision. Mr. Obama was an outspoken member of the Illinois Senate, and not someone known for dodging questions, whether they were on ethics, police responsibility, women’s choice or any other hot-button issue.
Even if Senator Clinton does not remember the constitutional majority requirement in Illinois, one of her advisers might have explained it to her. When I was White House counsel, President Clinton frequently reminded me that he had taught constitutional law before he ran for public office. I would hope that he would assume that another constitutional scholar — Barack Obama — would be aware of his voting responsibilities as a state legislator.
Abner J. Mikva has been an Illinois state legislator, a United States congressman, a federal judge and, from 1994 to 1995, White House counsel. He now directs the Mandel Legal Aid Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School. Mr. Mikva serves as an informal adviser to Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=274863
Friday, January 25, 2008
'Present' votes defended by Ill. lawmakers
By Daniel C. Vock, Stateline.org Staff Writer
!
In most legislatures, lawmakers vote either “yes” or “no” on bills, but in Illinois, senators and representatives can hit a third button for a “present” vote. Now that quirk — not unique to Illinois — has sparked heated exchanges among Democrats vying for president.

The two main rivals of Illinois’ U.S. Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination accused him during a debate Monday (Jan. 21) of ducking important votes by voting “present” about 130 times during his eight years in the Illinois Senate.

But Obama’s former colleagues who still serve in the Illinois Capitol say that the attacks are off-base and that either Obama’s opponents don’t understand how things work in Springfield or they are deliberately distorting his record.

---------------
State Sen. John Cullerton (D) calls the “present” vote “a no vote with an explanation.” Legally, there’s not much difference between the two votes, but practically, it can let the sponsors or other legislators know of problems with the bill that should be corrected.

That’s not how U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) characterized it in a debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C., this week.

“In the Illinois state Senate, Senator Obama voted 130 times ‘present.’ That’s not ‘yes,’ that’s not ‘no.’ That’s ‘maybe,’” she said.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those remarks angered Cullerton, who is also backing Obama. He stressed that voting “present” is different than not voting at all.

“There’s not one Republican, there’s not one member in the history of the General Assembly who is still alive today who would criticize voting ‘present.’ There’s not one member of the General Assembly who’s alive today who has ever not voted ‘present,’” he said.

Fritchey, the House Democrat who chairs a committee on civil law, said he often used the “present” vote when he thought a bill had constitutional or other legal problems.

That’s also the reason Obama, who taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago, gave during the debate for voting “present” on a bill he originally had sponsored.
“After I had sponsored it and helped to get it passed, it turned out that there was a legal provision in it that was problematic and needed to be fixed so that it wouldn’t be struck down,” he said.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
32. Hillary should fire Mark Penn, hire mculator
B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Fire Mark Penn? How bout shoot him?

Sorry Hillary didn't need Oprah to get where she is, she did it with hard work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
39. She should forget clever lines. At this point it will only backfire. She needs to make a serious
case for her candidacy AND the Democrats so that win or lose, she will have shown some class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. She needs suggestions
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 03:22 PM by mculator
Her lines aren't as clever as Barack's borrowed ones, I'm helping if I can. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Knock yourself out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. She needs suggestions
Her lines aren't as clever as Barack's borrowed ones, I'm helping if I can. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC