Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deval Patrick's Timeline Doesn't Mesh with Reality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:52 PM
Original message
Deval Patrick's Timeline Doesn't Mesh with Reality
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 03:54 PM by MassDemm
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/deval-patricks.html

Speaking to the New York Times Sunday, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick attempted to excuse his friend Sen. Barack Obama's lifting of part of his October 2006 "Just words" speech.

“In a telephone interview on Sunday, Mr. Patrick said that he and Mr. Obama first talked about the attacks from their respective rivals last summer, when Mrs. Clinton was raising questions about Mr. Obama’s experience, and that they discussed them again last week," the Times' Jeff Zeleny wrote. "Patrick said he told Mr. Obama that he should respond to the criticism, and he shared language from his campaign with Mr. Obama's speechwriters.”

But Obama was quoted using Patrick's language before the Summer of 2007.

"'We hold these truths to be self-evident, all men are created equal.’ Those are just words," Obama was quoted as saying in a March 19, 2007 New Republic story. " ‘I have a dream.’ Just words.”

So....the claim that Patrick an Obama "first" discussed this last Summer does not make sense.


MAKE SURE TO READ DOWN TO THE UPDATE!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. "We hold these truths" and "I have a dream"
are not just words. They are someone else's words. Using someone else's words knocked Senator Biden out of the race in 88.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Political speech is different than writing a book or a paper.
Biden plagiarized a law review article for a paper he wrote at law school.

And he did it long before he ran for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Don't bring logic into a Hillbot thread, it only causes chaos and heartburn for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Who is a hilbot?
What in my post indicated who I may support? I have supported General Clark since before 2004. I will vote in my state's primary next month and right now I don't know who to support, but peaking in on GD-P on occasion I've come to the obvious conclusion that Obama supporters are awful goddamned sensitive for no fucking reason. We are lucky to have two fine candidates for president, but I don't believe Obama deserves the likes of the chuckleheads who attempt to support him on this site. Your work merely alienates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sensitive?
I don't know, I consider plagiarism a pretty serious accusation, especially when it's so blatantly false and right before a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh the sensitivity
has been on display here long before the word plagiarism ever came up. If you don't heap praise early and often on Obama you are pounced on by the sensitive crowd. I had every intention of staying out of this squabble and did a good job for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You sound a little sensitive, BOSSHOG.
Lighten up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dupe post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Are you still on this? The rest of the country has moved forward.
Sorry but this isn't going to hurt Obama they way you had hoped.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Of course they're still on this...
...what else is there to grasp at? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Just words" are not exactly original to Patrick - Christ I've used the phrase
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 03:58 PM by Emillereid
myself when explaining how powerful language can be way before this election season. I can well imagine that the thought would or could come to Obama and his speech writers originally since it's such an obvious comeback to the 'just words' argument against his eloquent speeches. This is a non-issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think I read Obama was their when Patrick made speech.
Do Not laugh but I though Patrick was Irish until I saw a picture of him. I guess I just tagged the name as Irish from Ma. I just do not get up-tight about all this. After all these groups of words have been out in the open for years. Any one can use them and have over and over. Maybe they are just going to mean some thing to a few of us as a shock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. You are missing the point. The words were almost exact. They were used
by Deval Patrick against a woman he was running against for Governor.

They are neither Deval's or Obama's words, they are david axelrods and both of them men are a political sham. The words sound nice, but there is nothing there underneath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't you think Patrick would back up the other candidate no matter
what he said. You would be a dunce if you didn't think he would say anthing Hillary's opponent wanted him to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Timeline?? Is a whole "Plagiarism Truth Movement" gonna spring up...
...around this fluff?

:rofl:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Why did Deval Patrick not tell the truth? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Patrick won't admit it: both Obama and Patrick ran on AXLEROD slogans
There is no "politics of hope", no "movement for change", "hope and change" is just a slogan, etc. So he is left with lame defenses because he can't, for obvious reasons, admit the truth that both ran on AXLEROD's campaign gimmicks. Doing so would basically be an admission by a key Obama supporter that Obama's candidacy is a fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Bingo! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Obama Got Words?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Here ya go! Also, isn't Hillary married to a guy from Hope? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Clinton ran on issues and a record of performance, not slogans
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 04:25 PM by jackson_dem
Obamites, as usual, confuse using slogans like every politician does to running on slogans like Obama and Patrick. Clinton ran on a record and economic issues. Quick bullet points: he ran on Arkansas being #1 in job growth, #4 in economic growth, and 12 balanced budgets in a row and contrasted that to the failures of Reagan-Bush trickle-down economics. Compare that to Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Hillary was the governor of Arkansas? She was the president? Man, if I'd known any better, she was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Wasn't "the guy from Hope?"
What did he run on in 1992? Just words? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. Get over it.
The clintons have the infidelity of Bill to worry about. If this is the best you got on Obama, good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deval will do/say whatever Obama orders him to say to get that job in D.C.
The corner office was just a stepping stone back to the District.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC