Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Wisconsin Be a Bellwether for Ohio?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:42 AM
Original message
Could Wisconsin Be a Bellwether for Ohio?
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 10:12 AM by Bullet1987
I've heard and read that the demographics are roughly the same...and they're in about the same general location around the Great Lakes. Could Wisconsin be a bellweather for things to come in Ohio?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, and that's part of why I am nervous
Ohio's demographics are even more favorable to Clinton, and Obama has a lot of ground to make up there. If Clinton pulls off an "upset" tonight in Wisconsin, I don't see how Obama recovers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Even if he has more delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't know...
I've also read that there are large Black populations in many of the major cities like Cleveland and Cincinnati.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I just saw a poll this morning on CNN....
...and it had Obama ahead by 13 in Wisconsin.

There's no doubt he's taking Wisconsin.

He has significant momentum there. Wisconsin is a very Progressive state, with many
large universities in the urban areas. The state is known for it's liberal bent, which
favors Obama. The state is also very rural. Wisconsin is more comparable to Iowa, than
it is with Ohio. Wisconsin's minority population is low and the industries in the larger
cities are insurance/financial--as opposed to Ohio--which is more industrial.

There are more blue-collar, "rust belt" concentrations in Ohio, and I would agree that these
demographics favor Hillary Clinton. However, there are more African Americans in the larger Ohio cities,
which will favor Obama.

What happens in Ohio, will depend a great deal on what happens in Hawaii, Wisconsin and Texas.
If Obama beats Clinton handily in Wisconsin and Hawaii, he enters the Texas and Ohio races
with a ten-state winning streak. Clinton's 20-point lead in Texas has eroded to a 3-4 point
lead, according to most polls. Those factors could ding Clinton's lead in Ohio.

It appears that Obama *will* win Wisconsin and Hawaii, and that he's trending upward in Texas,
without even appearing there yet (whereas Clinton has made several appearances). I think this
thing is almost over. If he can take Texas, he'll definitely close the gap in Ohio, and if that
race becomes close--Clinton is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Wisconsin
Yeah I'd say we are more like Iowa too, with the exception of our larger cities which give us a higher African American population. And I suspect that our university system is larger and more liberal--but that's just a guess. We have several larger university branches: Eau Claire, La Crosse, Milwaukee, and of course Madison.

I visited Cleveland last summer, and it "seemed" more progressive than Milwaukee to me--but that's antecdotal. I also visited Des Moines last fall, and it seemed as progressive as Madison to me--and that's saying a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Hi neighbor!
:hi:

I was hoping someone from WI would chime in and add more detail.

I'm in Iowa, and I agree with everything you said.

I agree, your larger cities have a more diverse population than Iowa. Our entire state is 96 percent white.

Your university system is probably larger than Iowa's. We have Iowa State University (Ames, 25,000 students), University of
Iowa (Iowa City 22,000 students) and the University of Northern Iowa (Cedar Falls 15,000 students). We also have
many private, liberal arts colleges.

Madison and Iowa City are very similar. Iowa City is ultra Progressive. Interesting to hear your impressions of
Des Moines. It is pretty Progressive, but we don't have a large university in Des Moines. I live in a Des Moines
suburb.

Did you vote yet? I hope you don't have to wait in long lines. I'm sure it's freezing in WI.

It's -1 here today!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. hi!
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 03:34 PM by ginnyinWI
It was +8 degrees and sunny when I went out to vote about an hour and a half ago. There were no lines at 1 p.m.--and anyway, you can't judge anything by my area because it is 60% Republican. We have the highest amount of Repub voters of any county in the state, but we have the 2nd highest amount of Dem voters, too, after Milwaukee county--just not in my neighborhood.

I have an Iowa connection: for this school year my daughter is interning in Ames as a school psychologist, so I've visited. A lucky year for her to be there with all the attention Iowa had earlier. She's seen Obama speak in person four times, and she's seen the other candidates, too. And got to participate in the caucus. Great experience for a 25 year old to have.

My comment about Des Moines came from a visit to the farmer's market and talking to the people there, and also doing a little other shopping. Maybe not as thoroughly progressive as Madison, but I was surprised at how non-conservative it was. Ames was another story--seemed pretty conservative to me. Everyone is nice, but still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hope springs eternal. From your keyboard to God's ear ...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Staples Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obama will not win Ohio, but he will close the gap considerably
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Obama can't win Ohio?
Each day it seems the Clinton campaign shoots itself in the feet a little bit--is it so impossible to think Obama could pull out a win there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think if Obama can win Texas...Ohio will be irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. I think Democrats...t
...are hearing all of this bunk about Florida/Michigan and the Super Delegates.
They've got visions of mayhem at the Convention dancing in their heads, and I think
people are deciding to break for Obama--to avoid these messes.

I'm stunned by what has happened in Texas. Clinton had a 20-point lead last week.
She's been campaigning in Texas. Obama hasn't stepped foot in Texas, yet he's
evaporated her 20-point lead down to 2 or 3. He's definitely trending upward
in Texas. It looks like he will win Texas--plus he'll take Wisconsin and Hawaii.

The Texas polls, combined with Hawaii/Wisconsin wins will do damage to Clinton generally,
and I think he takes Ohio as well. She's ahead now by 20+---but she had that in Texas also.

I think this is over---we just have to jump through these hoops.

NO wonder the Clinton campaign is scrambling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Watch the Sunday news cycle in Ohio and Texas carefully...
... and be prepared to capitalize on the opportunity presented.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hope so. Also,
it's spelled "bellwether."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. D'OH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think Ohio's it's own beast.
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 10:19 AM by Kristi1696
If you look at the MSM's quaint little breakdowns, it might look similar. But you have to remember that different portions of the state have different influences; Midwestern and Southern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think that
Wisconsin may be close. The Clinton campaign needs a win there, or their lead in the "big three" will shrink and possibly disappear. Tonight's results should give us a measure of how effective the new round of dirty campaigning has worked for Senator Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wisconsin is a close approximation, but Ohio is very unique, especially SE Ohio...
... I'll be there later this week, giving press backgrounders on the Clintons and some of their financial dealings. I know Ohio quite well, and - though Wisconsin is a close approximation - it's not a direct predictor.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Gov Strickland of Ohio has already endorsed Clinton
I'm sure there will be major campaigning for Clinton in Ohio prior to March 4th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. *shrug* He may come down with a sudden case of the flu...
... once the Sunday news cycle hits.

Sometimes, the most gracious way to withdraw support is simply not to be seen on stage with the candidate.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Hm, is this the news you were referring to
a couple weeks ago? Can't say in Ohio that we have heard anything yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. When do you think undecideds will be tuning in? Sunday-ish?
; )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. probably, listen to the Sunday talk shows

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Sunday talk shows, maybe the Monday morning radio shows? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I listen to NPR in the morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COFoothills Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. Probably not....
Wisconsin has a strong progressive streak and a long history of voting that way. Ohio tends to be more centrist and has a much more diverse population and demographic.

Wisconsin is closer to Minnesota in it's voting habits than it is to Ohio.

If Obama wins WI big, it will help him in Ohio, but won't necessarily put him over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. there are Republicans who will readily cross over
They are not party loyalists and mostly vote their pocketbooks and own self-interest. But they keep re-electing Russ Feingold and David Obey time after time. Feingold got more votes than Kerry in 2004 because of this group. They could just go for Obama because they are PO'd at the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. Ohio is heavily Diebolded... Wisconsin, not so much...
Few states are as easy to corrupt as Ohio.... Just ask John Kerry in 2004.


The overwhelming majority of the voting in Ohio is by touch screen without a paper trail.


Ohio's results should ALWAYS be suspect. Lots of dirty pool historically in Ohio. Youngstown, being the midway point between New York and Chicago, has been a mafia haven for decades.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ohio has some similarities to Wisconsin
But as people have said, Wisconsin is more historically progressive than Ohio.

I do think Wisconsin is a bellwether in a way for Ohio in that if Obama wins in WI it'll show that he can finally win the white vote outright in a large primary. He has not been able to do that, but he has came close in a few states.

He doesn't need to win the white vote in Ohio seeing as how he'll see a much larger black turnout in Ohio than Wisconsin, but if he wins the Wisconsin white vote it will show that he has made key strides in Clinton's key base, low to middle income whites, which there is a larger population of in Ohio.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
22. Missouri's a better bellwether for OH, same demographics. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
24. A difference I see in Ohio is that the state seems to be very
polarized with the different groups not liking one another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC