Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Plagiarism helped take us to war in Iraq.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:32 AM
Original message
How Plagiarism helped take us to war in Iraq.
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 11:41 AM by flyarm
Plagiarism.. is a serious matter,..it helped take us to war..Plagiarism is a deception..it is a lie.

and it is important to every teacher in this country
and to every educational institution in this nation and others...


you can try to poo poo plagiarism..but it won't wash with me..it is deception..clear and simple..it is stealing..plain and simple..and we have proof positive of how plagiarism has killed...



and it is something we all should be wary of since Colin Powell helped take us to war based on Plagarism.

I take plagiarism very seriously ..so much so that i have kept these articles in my files ever since...yes Colin Powell plagiarised a College guys dissertation paper to help take us into war....remember when he sat In the UN and televisions all over the world were on Colin Powell and we as a nation and the worlds people stopped everything and watched him give his speech...

well his so called facts.. were plagiarised.

Plagiarism is a serious matter! 4000 dead soldiers and over 1 million dead Iraqi's can attest to that.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4601552-103690,0...


Downing St admits blunder on Iraq dossier
Plagiarism row casts shadow over No 10's case against Saddam

Michael White, Ewen MacAskill and Richard Norton-Taylor
Saturday February 8, 2003


Guardian

Downing Street yesterday apologised for its failure to acknowledge that much of its latest dossier on Iraq was lifted from academic sources, as the affair threatened to further undermine confidence in the government's case for disarming Saddam Hussein.
MPs and anti-war groups were quick to protest that other features of Whitehall's information campaign are suspect at a time when MI6 and other intelligence agencies are privately complaining at the way No 10 has been over-egging intelligence material on Iraq.

It emerged yesterday that the dossier issued last week - later found to include a plagiarised section written by an American PhD student - was compiled by mid-level officials in Alastair Campbell's Downing Street communications department with only cursory approval from intelligence or even Foreign Office sources.

Though it now appears to have been a journalistic cut and paste job rather than high-grade intelligence analysis, the dossier ended up being cited approvingly on worldwide TV by the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, when he addressed the UN security council on Wednesday.




xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4600667-103550,0...

UK war dossier a sham, say experts
British 'intelligence' lifted from academic articles

Michael White and Brian Whitaker
Friday February 7, 2003


Guardian

Downing Street was last night plunged into acute international embarrassment after it emerged that large parts of the British government's latest dossier on Iraq - allegedly based on "intelligence material" - were taken from published academic articles, some of them several years old.
Amid charges of "scandalous" plagiarism on the night when Tony Blair attempted to rally support for the US-led campaign against Saddam Hussein, Whitehall's dismay was compounded by the knowledge that the disputed document was singled out for praise by the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, in his speech to the UN security council on Wednesday.

Citing the British dossier, entitled Iraq - its infrastructure of concealment, deception and intimidation in front of a worldwide television audience Mr Powell said: "I would call my colleagues' attention to the fine paper that the United Kingdom distributed... which describes in exquisite detail Iraqi deception activities."




fly

I am an Edwards Democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. ignored
I'm having a field day today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've always wanted to try out the hide thread function
Congratulations, this thread gets it for being possibly the dumbest one I've ever seen on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Plagiarism: "The unauthorized use or close imitation..."
"...of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagiarism

Authorization: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/us/politics/18video.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1203345390-c+fcP0EhTH18Mj1EHYbfaw

QED.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love it! You forget how Bill's popularity soared when the Repos attacked. Thank you for
helping Obama!

Just think back to impeachment.....

Did the Repos drive down Bill approval rating by coming up with a new bullshit charge every day?

No, they drove his ratings up. So keep up the good work. I love it!

GoBama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. what you fail to realize is ..i can't stand Hillary..but i do hate plagarism.
so keep it up... it is people like you that have assured i will never vote for Obama either..i will most likely sit this election out!!

from an Edwards democrat..fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's even better! Thank you thank you thank you. Does that mean you will be leaving us soon?
Well, nice to know you fly, take care and better luck in 8 years!

Hill might get another chance She will be younger than McCain is now, and by that time she will be really ready on Day 1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. wow grow up!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. So I guess if one speaker quotes
certain politicians, then no other person after that can quote those same politicians.

I guess if one politician quotes "We the people", then no-one else after that first politician can do that.

This is just silly.

It is much like patenting DNA or corn crops or something else in the commons.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Somehow the unattributed, ghost written, Hillary book is okay?
A couple of lines in a speech vs. 300+ pages? Wait, wait, don't tell me - it doesn't count.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Takes_a_Village
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. i don't like plagiarism from any side..what part of that don't you people get?
we have dead soldiers partly attributed to plagiarism...so i guess plagiarism is just fine with you right??

and you can post all the other bullshit you want here..but two wrong plagiarist ..don't make it right..

two wrongs don't make a right..get that straight..

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Lies took us to war
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 01:47 PM by blogslut
And shame on you for trying to compare what Bush did to a politician using well-known terminology in a speech.

Seriously, this is a low as it gets. As of today, 3963 of your fellow Americans are dead because of Bush lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. and Colin Powell lies and plagiarism! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC