Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lets forget the first Obama gay misstep...this one is interesting.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:35 AM
Original message
Lets forget the first Obama gay misstep...this one is interesting.
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 12:39 AM by Neshanic
President George W. Bush’s spiritual advisor, Houston minister Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell, will endorse and campaign for Barack Obama:

“The Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell, longtime spiritual adviser to President George W. Bush and senior pastor of Windsor Village United Methodist Church, plans to campaign on behalf of Illinois Sen. Barack Obama.

Caldwell said Saturday that he’s endorsing Obama’s presidential campaign because of the senator’s “character, confidence and courage.” He emphasized that his support is personal and not tied to his job as pastor of the large United Methodist church. The pastor, however, said he has informed his congregation of his presidential choice and that Obama may even pay a visit to his church.

“I have been in contact with the Obama campaign team,” he said. “I will be making visits on his behalf.” Caldwell touted Obama as someone who is electable and “would do a wonderful job to bring people together to pursue a common vision we all have.”

Caldwell reports that Bush is “OK” with his endorsement."


Some info on my fellow "open hearts open minds, open doors Methodist"


"Ok, so a conservative black minister is endorsing Obama, and is in contact with the campaign about campaign visits two days before Obama gives a major speech on intolerance in the black community. That's not such a big deal. But let's look at the church's programming?


"Metanoia Ministry
We are pleased to announce the creation of " The Way, The Truth and The Life", a program created to provide Christ Centered instruction for those seeking freedom from homosexuality, lesbianism, prostitution, sex addiction and other habitual sins."

"That's pretty incendiary stuff, isn't it, especially for an Obama endorsement on the day he's giving a speech on homophobia. And someone knows that it's really bad, since I had to go to the Google cache to find the page, even though it was working 12 hours ago. Now all you get is a 'file not found.' It's weird how, even though Caldwell is making a personal endorsement that is not connected to his official position with the church, the church has changed its programming on its web site to be a bit more on-message.

I guess that's the power of hope."

I especially love his response to the ministry....
“I got to tell you, this is going to sound real stupid, but I didn’t know it was on our website,” Caldwell said. “I was surprised and embarrassed by it. I’m embarrassed from the standpoint that I should have known. We have 120 ministries at the church. You can’t be on top of everything.”




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. old news
this story came out like a week or two ago


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, we really need to keep current on Obama wanting his cake and eating it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. What's not old news is the harm done to glbt people - especially kids - by this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
78. there is no harm being done to GLBT people
if you and the others would take the time to listen to what Obama has said, you know that he is not homophobic; he supports gay rights

Obama has gone into black churches and talked about the need for acceptance of gay people

he's walked the walk


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
75. New news to me.
Keeping this kicked, because Obama has issues with gays. It is an obvious pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. who cares?
another vapid post of nothingness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The GLBT community at DU is well aware of the lack of caring on this issue
from those who care nothing for civil rights for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. It's not a lack of caring
It's seeing other issues besides this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. See Post #2: "Who cares".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. This is what happens when some of you
harp on this over and over again. Some of us see it differently.
You cannot bully people into going along with you. Barack has stood by us quite well. By refusing to acknowledge that fact we turn a lot of people off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. "Who cares".
I know who doesn't care - quite a few on DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #29
42. A few of you fools that harp on this over and over are only making it worse
Everybody knows how you feel. By bashing and bullying them about it is not going to make it one bit better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. What exacty am I making worse????
I doubt I'm impacting anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. By you Bear, Cboy and a few others who try to bully people over this
You drive people away. Nobody likes a bully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. What am I driving them away from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. Caring about our issues.
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 02:23 AM by donheld
If you refuse to care about their issues. Why should they care about yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. Those are people who don't care about our isues to begin with.
When people who don't follow or give a shit about GLBT people or issues try to score political points off of bogus shit and refuse to even listen to actual gay people, they establish that they don't care about us ANYWAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. There are some you can alienate by your behavior
I guarantee it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. So it goes. If people are alienated by my rejecting a bigot, I will have to live with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #61
65. That's not what I meant and you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. I rather thought it WAS what you meant. I'm done with straght people telling me what to think about
my own issues. If they don't like what I think about it, I'll live with the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. You shouldn't let them tell you what to think
But you don't have to bully. Especially in here. In DU you can't always tell who's gay and who's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #51
77. Input from a random person...
You're not driving *me* away. I appreciate the information. And I *sure* don't mind that it's "harped on," as I don't get on the computer every day and might otherwise miss it.

This one issue sure does worry me. And even more worrying on this particular endorsement is that the guy is a buddy of Bu$h. Of course, Obama can't prevent people from endorsing him, so I'm looking at *his* response to stuff like this.

I appreciate the heads-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #45
56. You know. Don't be uppity GLBT folk!
Go to the back of the bus, be quiet and "hope" things will "change"! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #56
76. Keep those silly fags down.
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. See above: "who cares?"
I am responding specifically to those who expressly DO NOT CARE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
70. A child's brain was blown out in his middle school classroom today because he was gay.
Sometimes it's not that you can't "see" other issues, it's that how people "see" one issue that tells you all you need to know about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. You're actually proud to not care about gay people?
Damn. I knew you didn't care, but taking pride in it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
55. Progressives do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
68. Your ideology is a vapid hole of nothingness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is this kind of like Ann Coulter's endorsement of Hillary...
Getting an endorsement you really don't want? Please please please tell me I'm right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Don't know much about this
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 12:46 AM by southern_dem
but is there any thing from Obama's camp saying anything about his "endorsement"? Or is Caldwell just saying, hey I'm helping this guy whether they want me to or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. “I have been in contact with the Obama campaign team,”
said. “I will be making visits on his behalf."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. "Caldwell has not, and will not, be asked to do anything for the campaign"
"I've talked to the Obama campaign about this, and they assure me of a few things:

"1. Caldwell has not, and will not, be asked to do anything for the campaign (and this means, we hope, that Obama won't be doing appearances with the man any time soon).

"2. Caldwell was simply wrong when he told the papers this weekend that the campaign asked him to travel around the country on their behalf. In other words, Caldwell was freelancing when he called the paper for an interview."

http://www.americablog.com/2008/01/obama-and-gays-again.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. But he'd been working with Obama previously and extensively
I hear that Sen. Barack Obama's campaign will be doing a big event in Charleston, S.C., with several prominent black religious leaders in the morning.


Among them will be Kirbyjon Caldwell, the Methodist minister who delivered the inaugural prayer for President Bush and is a longtime friend and spiritual adviser to the president. Mr. Caldwell has been campaigning for Obama all year.


When was that written? That was written on December 3rd, 2007. After the McClurkin dust up (when Obama should have known better than to associate with any "Ex-Gay" people if he really cared for LGBT people) and before the SC primaries. It just goes to show where his priorities lie.


More.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Washington Times???
Great source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Keep hate alive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
41. I apologize for hating the white supremacists at the Washington Times.
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is very old, and we have seen that he has NOT campaigned with him.
Nice try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. What about the refusal to be photographed with Newsom?
I love watching you guys twist yourself into illogical pretzels over all this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Newsom's gay?
Huh. Learn something new every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. No, but he was apparently toxic to Obama
because Newsom had publicly championed same sex marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DGoldman1212 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Supposedly he is...
They speak about him like he is the reincarnation of Harvey Milk or something. I'm gay and I could care less about Gavin Newsom and or whether Obama wanted to have his picture taken with him. Newsom has had his fair share of bad press in the past, therefore a snub of Newsome isn't a snub to the gay communnity. And Obama had no problem winning Marin, Alameda and San Francisco Counties...so apparently it wasnt that big of a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I didnt realize Newsom was gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Nice try
you can't even defend it. That tells me all I need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Is Gavin Newsome Gay?
Silly me, I thought he was a very horny Hetero.

Maybe Obama detected a little too much Bill Clinton in Gavin for his taste. :shrug:

AIDE QUITS AS NEWSOM'S AFFAIR WITH HIS WIFE IS REVEALED
Campaign manager confronts mayor, who is 'in shock'

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom's re-election campaign manager resigned Wednesday after confronting the mayor about an affair Newsom had with his wife while she worked in the mayor's office, City Hall sources said.

Alex Tourk, 39, who served as Newsom's deputy chief of staff before becoming his campaign manager in September, confronted the mayor after his wife, Ruby Rippey-Tourk, told him of the affair as part of a rehabilitation program she had been undergoing for substance abuse, said the sources, who had direct knowledge of Wednesday's meeting.

Rippey-Tourk, 34, was the mayor's appointments secretary from the start of his administration in 2004 until last spring. She told her husband that the affair with Newsom was short-lived and happened about a year and a half ago, while the mayor was undergoing a divorce from his then-wife, Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle, said the sources, who spoke on condition they not be identified.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/31/BAGM3NSFGQ7.DTL
--------------------

Sex scandal a serious obstacle to mayor's hopes for higher office
With the startling admission -- and public apology -- regarding an affair with his campaign manager's wife, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom set off on Thursday what one Democratic strategist described as a mushroom cloud over his promising political career.

Already, politicians and consultants are assessing the fallout: Has the talented Democratic rising star irrevocably damaged his chances for re-election -- and prospects for state or national office? And has he also wounded his party by handing Republicans juicy evidence of "San Francisco values" that are outside the mainstream?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/02/02/MNGHNNTLHV1.DTL

------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Obama refusing to be photographed with Newsom occurred in 2004
Years before any marital infidelity stories.

Next excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #21
38. Hillary's husband...
Urged Kerry to come out against Gay Marriage outright. Kerry refused. I guess that doesn't matter though. Only perceived slights by Obama are counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
69. He most certainly did, he was part of the South Carolina tour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. We discussed this one too
It's not going to change my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DGoldman1212 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. I've seen it all today...
Everything from Obama thinks gay people are sinful to Obama wants to send us to death camps. Now they are digging up not wanting to have his picture taken with Newsom. With the flip/flop record of Hillary Clinton on issues like DADT and DOMA, maybe Obama should refuse to be photographed with her after debates.

Thankfully, Obama is rated as the most progressive senator we have. And someone should notify The HRC (Human Rights Campaign) because they rate him very highly too - last time I looked, evenly with Hillary.

As far as I can note - Obama is doing fantastic with "the gays" here in Central Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Seems to me like some of my gay brothers and sisters are throwing Obama
under the bus because he made a friendly gesture towards a couple whom some want strung up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. If Clinton gave a platform to a kkk member I'd treat her the same way.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DGoldman1212 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Once while in DC I saw Clinton and Byrd having lunch..
Is that close enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. I don't understand the question.
Is Byrd a KKK member?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DGoldman1212 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Used to be...
And I was being a tad bit sarcastic. I have ill feeling towards Byrd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. So you saw Clinton with someone who has repudiated racism. And I'm supposed
to see a problem there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. I"ve heard that argument before.
I didn't buy it then and I'm not going to buy it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. So don't buy it. Go ahead and ignore the real damage done by assholes like McClurkin.
Your choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Who said I ignore damage done by McClurkin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. You've established that it's not a priority for you.
It is a priority for me. And I won't support its facilitation.

In the end Obama's most likely to win. So you'll get the candidate you want. He won't need my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. I did no such thing. I said it's not top priority. It's not No 1. # 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Or #2, or #3, or #4, or #5.
For me it is a top priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Fine, just stop the bullying.
Some of us see a few more things that are extremely important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. I rather consider the people who don't care about GLBT people telling us who we should support
on GLBT issues to be the bullies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. Both sides can be bullies. It's not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
35. Christians are homophobic...
That is not news. However, our party cannot be anti-Christian. The only way is to converse with them and change minds, one mind at a time. It looks like Caldwell is already on the side of tolerance, but apparently for some people that is not enough. Apparently for some we need to increase the divisiveness by casting all Christians overboard, rather than educating them, reaching out to them, and changing their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. No, some Christians are homophobic. Do you really want to partner with the worst?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. The majority of them are...
That's the times we live in. 10 years ago it was even worse. You simply cannot isolate homophobes from your party. You can only accept them in and change their minds - unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #50
73. I dispute that the majority of Christians are homophobic
Do have a shered of evidence to support that assertion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #35
47. 1. Using one bigot to spew bigotry to other bigots is not "reaching out"
2. If Obama is so fond of "reaching out" then why isn't he "reaching out" to racists? Don't they need to be educated and to have their minds changed?
3. Who here is suggesting we throw Christians overboard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
60. This is the EXACT same thing as the Ann Coulter Endorsement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. Other than Obama working with the endorser?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Except they never worked with each other. The endorser merely said he was going to
The Endorser was just speaking, kinda like what Ann Coulter said she would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. See Post #24.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goat or Panic Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
71. I'm still stuck on
George W. Bush having a spiritual adviser. Talk about a thankless job.

Caldwell is apparently as incompetent as everyone else in the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
72. If Caldwell had endorsed and announced he was campaigning for Hillary...
I can just imagine the 30 threads here about it.

Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
74. Logic of holding a candidate responsible for EVERYONE who endorses them is just ridiculous! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC