Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unhinged: Six Of Last Seven Columns By Maureen Dowd And Frank Rich Bashed Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:07 PM
Original message
Unhinged: Six Of Last Seven Columns By Maureen Dowd And Frank Rich Bashed Hillary
Some here still believe NY Times somehow "protects" Hillary, but the truth is:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/02/unhinged_six_of.php
It's kind of striking that Maureen Dowd's last four columns in a row, and two of Frank Rich's last three, all bashed Hillary. I mean, the duo has gotten so utterly predictable that even The Times's editors must be dimly aware of it.

It's really not an overstatement to say that their columns at this point read as if the two -- who have a long journalistic history together -- are just writing for each othe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jillian Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Many progressives dislike Maureen Dowd.
She shits on Democrats all of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. she shits on Bush lots lots more, maybe she is just honest about her point of view
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. You Gotta Admit, Hillary Gives Them Plenty To Write About nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yep, if I was a columnist
I'd likely write about nothing but until Hillary was out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Riiiight! Clenis always did it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Krugman is doing all he can to offset them I guess
They're op-ed columnists. They can choose what they want to write about and it's going to be their opinion. That's what they're being paid to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. No kidding? because he does honest economic analysis - Saying her plan
is only marginally better than yours - how is this "offsetting" pure venom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sloppyjoe25s Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. you may not like her point of view
but her columns are generally quite funny and entertaining...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sadly, The Times Endorsed Clinton
But the op-ed folks are permitted to have independent thoughts - just like Fox news, no?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. shocking, eh?
Not. Biased doesn't even begin to cover it with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. And Krugman?
Let's be fair here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yeah - let's. Krugman is fair - hardly a Hillary loyalist. Just fair.
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 06:11 AM by robbedvoter
Now. reading this reactions I understand how freepers think the media is 'librul" and "unfair" to W. When you're coddled - it's never enough, ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps these OP-ED columnists don't like her.
I'm just sayin'... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC