Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ROFLMAO At Those Saying "Hillary DARE Not Use The 'Present Vote' Meme Anymore!" LOL!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:21 PM
Original message
ROFLMAO At Those Saying "Hillary DARE Not Use The 'Present Vote' Meme Anymore!" LOL!
:rofl:

Oh my god are some of you REALLY that naive in your political arguments? Do you REALLY think that one absent vote wouldn't have done ANYTHING to change the outcome and was more procedural than anything (yeah yeah I know, but you know what I mean), now cancels out the 130 'Present' votes he had while in the legislature? Are you kidding me? Do you seriously believe that?

Oh c'mon now!!! Who are you all kidding??? Sometimes the stuff here is just too damn funny.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. You used to be better than this. I can't really imagine anyone with any intelligence
defending Clinton's absent as "procedural" while attacking Obama's procedural "present" votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I Didn't Say She Shouldn't Have Been There.
Personally, I don't think it's nearly as dramatic as some are making it, but I digress. I don't mind a mindset that she should've been there.

But to say that this one vote now offsets and cancels the issue of his 130 'strategical' present votes, is nothing short of asinine. Sorry! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Oh, one doesn't offset the other. One doesn't excuse the other, either. Both Clinton and Obama
have dismal attendance records, with Obama's worse than Clinton's. And you are certainly intelligent enough to know that the "present" votes are a completely different animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. This vote was a big deal. I did not excuse Obama's non-K/L vote, and you shouldn't
excuse this. The vote on this determines whether you stand for the Constitution and the rule of law, or whether you stand with BushCo and corporations. Obama passed this particular test, she failed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. At least Obama showed up. Hillary wasn't even "present".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, apparently the "Present" votes were strategic, which
is something Hillary refuses to acknowledge.

However, for the FISA vote, it would have been important to demonstrate where she stood on this very important vote - where it was not strategic to vote yes, no, present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The strategy was protecting Obama's political behind (sometimes a 1 man 'strategy')
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Take it up with Planned Parenthood. It's their strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Protecting it from what?
Of those 130 Illinois senate votes, name one that you think Obama was trying to protect himself on by voting "present."

I'm assuming you're familiar with all the actual bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Gun control for one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Which bill?
What's the number?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Here ya go
For example, in 1997, Obama voted "present" on two bills (HB 382 and SB 230) that would have prohibited a procedure often referred to as partial birth abortion. He also voted "present" on SB 71, which lowered the first offense of carrying a concealed weapon from a felony to a misdemeanor and raised the penalty of subsequent offenses.

In 1999, Obama voted "present" on SB 759, a bill that required mandatory adult prosecution for firing a gun on or near school grounds. The bill passed the state Senate 52-1. Also in 1999, Obama voted "present" on HB 854 that protected the privacy of sex-abuse victims by allowing petitions to have the trial records sealed. He was the only member to not support the bill.

In 2001, Obama voted "present" on two parental notification abortion bills (HB 1900 and SB 562), and he voted "present" on a series of bills (SB 1093, 1094, 1095) that sought to protect a child if it survived a failed abortion.

And finally in 2001, Obama voted "present" on SB 609, a bill prohibiting strip clubs and other adult establishments from being within 1,000 feet of schools, churches, and daycares.

If Obama had taken a position for or against these bills, he would have pleased some constituents and alienated others. Instead, the Illinois legislator-turned-U.S. senator and, now, Democratic presidential hopeful essentially took a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. This vote wouldn't have made a difference. But she has demonstrated where she stands...
When she voted with the Democrats on Cloture two times on this bill, when her vote DID matter.

January 28, 2008
Statement of Senator Clinton:

Today, I will vote against Republican efforts to shortchange the debate on the FISA Amendments Act, important legislation that would modernize our surveillance laws and give our nation's intelligence professionals the tools they need to fight terrorism and make our country more secure. Rather than allow the Senate the opportunity to consider important amendments to this vital legislation, Republicans are instead blocking meaningful debate on this bill by playing procedural games, choosing instead to score cheap political points at the expense of our Homeland Security.

This legislation deserves a thorough debate. Several provisions - including those which would have a profound impact on the civil liberties of Americans - need to be the subject of careful deliberation. For example, the bill under consideration gives telecommunication companies blanket retroactive immunity for their alleged cooperation in the administration's warrantless wiretapping program. I continue to believe that a grant of retroactive immunity is wrong, and I have cosponsored Senator Dodd's amendment to remove that provision from the bill. The Bush Administration has blatantly disregarded Americans' civil liberties over the past seven years, and I simply will not trust them to protect Americans' privacy rights. With the temporary Protect America Act set to expire on February 1st, I strongly believe that we need to pass balanced legislation that protects our civil liberties and the rule of law while giving our law enforcement and intelligence agencies the tools they need to protect our country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's not just the outcome that is so upsetting
it's that Hillary didn't even try.

She didn't try.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. "It's better to be a hypocrite, then have no position at all."
As somebody once said.

Of course, the 130 "present" votes are a completely different issue. Voting "present" is a procedural matter for fixing flawed legistlation, it's not the same as simply missing votes.

Furthermore, you've completely ignored what the issues were in those votes.

And even more impressive... you've failed to take into consideration whether or not a "yea" or "nay" vote from any of those 130 bills would have changed the outcome, and argument that you just used. Right now. In this thread. Right here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Sorry Bub. 1< 130.
Because she did it once, even if his 130 wouldn't have changed the outcome either (but it's the spineless kinda repeated avoidance of taking a position that matters), anyone saying that one cancels out and offsets his 130 are out of their damn political minds! It cracks me up!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. You're comparing 130 apples to one rotten orange.
I'm also pretty sure that Clinton's missed more than one vote.

Furthermore, nobody's that concerned that Clinton missed one vote. On a presidential campaign, people miss lots of votes (maybe she couldn't find a parking space?)

The whole point of the discussion is that every one of Clinton's criticisms of Obama is turning out to be hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why are they concerned about whether she showed up or not?
They're not voting for her, so why are they giving a damn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not Sure. Maybe Somethin About Knee Jerking, Lack Of Critical Thinking Ability, I Dunno?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. So, you agree with the proposition that DUers ought not
post critically on candidates for whom they are not voting in the primaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. It wasn't 130! It was 129 - so stop saying that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. LOL
Gross exaggerations shouldn't be allowed. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I Like Rounding :o)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freetospeak Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Wow, talk about being desperate......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. If that's what's happening
Then I'm logging off. There are more mature people on the car racing sites that I post on. I'm outa here - thanks for the heads up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. It doesn't matter whether her supporters use it or not
It doesn't seem to be working very well.

It's just a dumb meme, largely because it does the typical political game of ignoring what really was involved for cheap political points. People are sick of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. I seriously think Hillary is a huge hypocrite. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. And the Obama supporters making this a huge issue?
What are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Pointing out the fact that ALL politicians make strategic NON votes...
including her highness, Empress Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. No, they are acting as if she has crossed some horrific line
That has never been crossed before, lol.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. They're also ignoring that she's voted on this before, so we know where she stands
And it's the correct position.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. The problem is she made a huge issue out of the "present" votes as did many of you here...
teapot, meet kettle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. No excuses for either of them. Can we try that?
I know that means standing for something other than hypocrisy, but let's give it a go, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Fine, but count the "outraged" threads spawning over this
By Obama supporters, as if he never, ever used the same excuse to miss a vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Please, "outrage" threads abound by both sides over the most trivial of things.
And this isn't exactly a "trivial" issue, at least not to me. And I suspect to many Hillary supporters as well. She should have been there. I'm no Obama supporter and I'm not giving him a pass for his lack of concern on some votes, and I won't give her one either.

I don't give a shit what excuse EITHER of them tosses at us for missing key votes, regardless of the predicted outcome. It's their FUCKING JOB. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I'm telling you the reason for this thread
If Obama supporters weren't making half a dozen outraged threads about her non-vote, it wouldn't need to be commented on.

SHE HAS LOST ANY MORAL RIGHT TO THE PRESIDENCY etc.

It's absurd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. It's a big deal to me, and I don't support Obama. So I'm glad to see SOMEONE commenting on it.
SHE HAS LOST ANY MORAL RIGHT TO THE PRESIDENCY

If this example of hyperbole bothers you than you're going to be REAL busy on DU. ;)

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. HYPOCRISY
It's endless and with a straight face here at DU, every day!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
38. You might have a point if your weren't LYING in your premise
That those "present" votes were somehow a failure or indicative of anything other than a careful political strategy outlined by one of OUR interest groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Hey Jackass, If You're Gonna Call Someone A Liar, Make Sure They, Like, Actually Lied And Stuff.
I did no such thing.

Personally, I do find the number of his 'present' votes to be a bit unnerving, regardless of strategical intent. They were just too many and on too many big issues. But I do understand that many of them were the right way to go. The point though, is that the sheer number and positioning of them is absolutely legitimate substance for criticism, and trying to claim that because of Hillary's missed voted today, she can no longer criticize him for that whatsoever, is nothing short of politically asinine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. over 4000 votes 130 Present votes = aprox. 3% is that all you got?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. Nice attempt at derision. You use it an awful lot, though, and it loses effectiveness.
Especially when you're wrong.

I would say that bringing up her failure to vote on the telecom immunity issue would constitute a pretty solid rejoinder to anyone attacking Obama for his "present" votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. plus the fact
She is in the US Senate, her votes affect everybody in the US. His voting present in the Illinois Senate affects only Illinois.

No present vote he ever made in Illinois affected me, or any of the other 288 million US citizens outside Illinois.

So yes, 1 vote in the US senate is bigger than every vote he ever made in Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. ROFLMAO!!!!!!
:spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray:


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
44. Today's failures are no laughing matter.
You'd never know they were running for office, so meekly did they show up to vote, or fail to show up to vote. These things are symptomatic of a great sickness in the system, and attempts to turn it into a joke it for political (or personal) points come across as weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC