Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Brokered Convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 05:52 AM
Original message
A Brokered Convention
How possible is this?

Could Dean do worse than expected in Iowa and New Hampshire and a strong #2 emerge to give him the fight of his life and split the democratic party in 2?

Who would be the "compromise" candidate? Al Gore? Hillary Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't even want to go there
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Not gonna happen--Dean wins
This is just a Clark campaign wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No it's not.
Edited on Wed Dec-31-03 08:34 AM by eileen_d
Psst - Supporting Dean does not mean you have to smear Clark. Honest.

I truly hope that it doesn't come down to the scenario in the initial post. It wouldn't be good for anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. a thought
A compromise candidate should be one of the declared candidates. Giving someone else a free pass is unlikely to energize the base unless that person has the stature of a JFK. Honestly, I don't see anyone in the party with that appeal right now.

In the event of no clear centrist winner, I would like to see Democrats get excited about liberalism. Once upon a time that wouldn't have been too much to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Of course, anything is conceivable.
I personally don't think it will happen though. There are too many safeguards in the primary/convention system designed to prevent such a thing from happening. I seriously doubt Democratic leaders want to present an image of a fragmented convention to potential voters. If they can do anything to prevent such an image from being presented, they'll do it. Then again, Dean's feud with DLC leaders and with McAuliffe might lead to a brokered convention. I imagine Dean would pick a moderate running mate in the hopes of averting such a situation.

I would imagine that, if a compromise candidate became necessary, the candidate might come from the ranks of the nine Democratic hopefuls. Other than that, Gore and Hillary seem like the only two who could pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. If it goes to the convention
the "compromise" candidate will be Clark.

Gore has taken himself off the table by endorsing Dean.

Hillary will absolutely positively 100% certain not run (what part of "no" don't people understand?)

The idea of giving the nod to the 2nd or 3rd place candidate seems weird. On the other hand, Clark has been scrupulous about not giving the other candidates reason to hate his guts. He'll slap back if he's attacked but he hasn't actually gone after any other candidate on his own initiative, other than Bush.

So, if Dean hasn't sewn it up with elected delegates before he walks into that hall, I don't think he has much chance of leaving with the nod.

He has to win it in the primaries. Counting on the "committed" superdelegates is a losing strategy, especially when taking on the leadership of the party is such a large part of your rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
artr2 Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. the compromise candidate will be someone who Dean has beat
How fast can we give bush the election? Do you know how may people would turn off of the political process then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Not this year.
A three month campaign against Bush/Rove, especially with September 11 hypefest and Osamapalooza likely planned for October would be a nightmare. This nomination is gonna be settled by March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Northwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not gonna happen
If they try, we will remove our support, and they cannot win without us. We control this race, period.

Nobody But Dean '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. "not gonna happen"
Let me get this straight NBD

What if Dean doesn't get the nomination?
Say just hypotheticly more democrats vote for someone else to stand up to Bush in the general election. Do you plan to stay home, vote for Bush or write in Dean's name on the ballot?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hi abburdlen!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. what
all 250,000 of you?? heh heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Nope
Dean or no I'll be voting Dem this coming year. Depending on how things go down... the future (after 04) remains unclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Let me see, the last time
it took more than one ballot to nominate was in 1932, when the Democrats needed four ballots to nominate FDR. And in 1952 it took three ballots to select Adlai Stevenson.

I don't understand why so many people seem to think going in to the convention in July without a clear nominee is a good thing. It's not. What we all should hope for is that no later than mid-March we all know who the nominee will be and we all get behind that man and national ads start running to counter what will undoubtedly be a huge media blitz on the part of the Republicans.

Remember that the reason Dean opted out of campaign finance limits is NOT because he's a sleaze bag who won't play by the rules, but because he understands quite clearly that George W Bush & Co are total scum balls themselves who have no intention whatsoever of playing by the rules. And they're not dumb enough to accept campaign finance limits, not when they can raise $200 million or more to fight against any possible threat to their illegal power.

What we want is to be able to spend the entire spring, summer, and fall bringing our message to the American people and make sure they understand quite clearly what damage the Bush regime has wrought upon this country and the world. If we're still dithering about until the first week of July as to who will be our standard bearer, well, we can kiss the WH and probably our rear ends goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Absolutely correct
I am deeply concerned about a floor fight...it will only hurt us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPhD Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Worst case....
Imagine this scenario: (1) Sharpton manages to win a few delegates (he probably will, at least in South Carolina). (2) Dean loses Iowa and falls short of expectations in New Hampshire, resulting in a long, drawn-out primary season, with at least Clark, Gephardt, and/or Kerry fighting Dean to the bitter end. (3) Dean must keep moving left to wage the battle, is unable to tack to the center before the convention, and all the while the other candidates and all the pundits are beating the "unelectable" drum. (4) The candidates arrive at the convention with Dean just a few delegates short of those needed for the nomination. (5) The anti-Dean candidates pool their delegates around a more "centrist" and "electable" candidate (Clark, Gephardt, Kerry, or even a drafted Hillary)--but they too are a few delegates short of securing the nomination. (6) Sharpton becomes the king-maker, by throwing his delegates to one camp or the other--but he demands the VP slot in return! (7) Dean accepts the deal (fearing that he has to do it, or the chance will pass and the nomination will be "stolen" from him)--and it is Dean/Sharpton who will challenge Bush/Cheney in '04. (8) With Sharpton acting as a "left-wing crazy" anchor, the Dean/Sharpton ticket finds it utterly impossible to shake the "out-of-touch ultra-liberal" label during the campaign. (9) Bush wins in a landslide (thus gaining a "mandate" for his right-wing agenda) that includes long Senate coattails (raising the GOP to close to the filibuster-proof 60). (10) Four more years of Bush programs follow--and they are now unstoppable!

Yes, I know this is just wild fiction, but I find such speculation kind of fun. It's kind of like writing a disaster novel.

But, in all seriousness, I fear the results of compromises made during a brokered convention. Perhaps an angry and offended Dean goes the third party route. Perhaps a draft-Hillary movement swells but she refuses the nomination (preferring to wait for 2008), thus making the other potential candidates look like weakling/idiots. Etc. Whoever wins, he/she had better have it all locked up before the convention starts. A brokered convention would provide great political theater, but it will not do the Party any good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Hi JDPhD!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Hi JDPhD
I have enough faith in Dean that he wouldn't go third party. He'll break my heart if he does. Anyway... I agree it's fun to speculate. I say "fasten your seatbelt darlings we're in for a bumpy ride"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Just a tad
concerned about the damage the pugs could do in the open primary states.

Welcome to du.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. HOW in the world could Dean do "worse than expected"?
limit opposition to 1%? Win New Hampshire by less than 20 points?

Given the state of things financially alone, just isn't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC