|
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 12:09 PM by Tom Rinaldo
I can make a case that Gore would have a better chance of unifying our Party around Hillary than around Obama. Gore has significant influence with many Democrats of all stripes, but if push came to shove I strongly suspect that Al Gore's influence is noticeably greater on whole among current Obama supporters than it is among current Clinton supporters, and I say that as someone who admires Al Gore and had him as my second choice for President.
Healing wounds and rifts in our Party ultimately means helping those who end up on the losing end of a conflict make peace with and support those who end up on the winning end. Peace makers are needed on both side to end any conflict, but to cite an extreme example, Bill Clinton would not be as effective reaching out to Obama supporters to get them on board if Hillary wins as Jimmy Carter might be.
If Al Gore endorsed Barack Obama it would strengthen Barack Obama no doubt, and the same is true if Gore endorsed Hillary Clinton. But Gore endorsing Clinton would have more of a unifying effect than the other way around, if that was his priority. Hillary Clinton obviously has deep support in the Democratic Party. She actually is winning the popular vote in this primary season to date. That's by a very small margin true, but the margin increases if you include the 1.5 million votes cast in Florida which I think should be considered when looking at the popular vote spread between Clinton and Obama, but Gore has better lines of communication open with Obama's base than Clinton's. If Al Gore endorsed Obama it would mostly entrench existing divisions. If he endorsed Clinton it would help to narrow them.
Again, I don't think Gore should endorse anyone. We need leaders in our Party who can stand above the fray and help us pick up the pieces and unite when our nominee is finally selected. Howard Dean is one of the leaders best positioned to do so. Al Gore is another. I know Al Gore had meaningful solid reasons to endorse Howard Dean for President when he did in 2004 that went beyond his concern for unifying our Party. But Al Gore did mention a desire to unite our Party behind one person then, before the primaries were over when he announced his early endorsement of Dean, and that aspect of his intent did not bear fruit in 2004, and I doubt it would in 2008 either.
|