Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama wins 14 of 22 states, 8 over 65% (3 over 70%) comes within 10 pts. of Hillary in CA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:05 AM
Original message
Obama wins 14 of 22 states, 8 over 65% (3 over 70%) comes within 10 pts. of Hillary in CA
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 08:27 AM by ProSense
CA (90% reporting)
Clinton 52%
Obama 42%
_____________________

States Obama won with more than 65% of the vote:

AK: Obama 75%, Clinton 25%
CO: Obama 67%, Clinton 32%
GA: Obama 67%, Clinton 31%
ID: Obama 79%, Clinton 17%
MN: Obama 67%, Clinton 32%
IL: Obama 65%, Clinton 33%
KS: Obama 74%, Clinton 26%
MN: Obama 67%, Clinton 32%

(Over 60%)
ND: Obama 61%, Clinton 37%

States Clinton won with more than 60% of the vote:

AR: Clinton 69%, Obama 27%

__________________

Obama negates Hillary's northeast advantage, winning CT:

NY
Clinton 57%
Obama 40%

MA
Clinton 56%
Obama 41%

NJ
Clinton 54%
Obama 44%

CT
Clinton 47%
Obama 51%

__________________________

Popular vote:

Clinton 7,217,669 (50.21%)
Obama 7,158,480 (49.79%)

Without California

Clinton 5,250,052 (-1,967,617)
Obama 5,565,179 (-1,593,301)

posted here




Edited to add vote totals

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's what I'm saying. Obama won handily in the states he took
for the most part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's insane.
Are those numbers really right?

It confirms what I've always felt about Clinton having zero appeal in middle America. We don't need another coastal candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Arkansas and Tennesse are not middle America??? Damn.
And Oklahoma???
And Missouri??? (because she lost by a slim margin. So slim that the Edwards vote could have tilted it her way...or not)

And let's be honest...
Obama won Idaho, Utah, Kansas and Alaska. Those states are going to the republikkan candidate in November unless a meteor strikes the state and kills only the republikkan voters)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. A Hillary nomination = motivation by the Repubs like NEVER before
A clear victory for Repubs in November and no surprises. Just the facts ma'am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Funny... That sounds like a prediction
The reich wing has come out against McCain as well.

We shall see what happens.

But...remember what you said is an opinion and a prediction.
It's not a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. ...that is guaranteed to happen...
...then it will be a fact!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. If Obama is our candidate, Kansas will go for him.
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 09:15 AM by tblue37
Turnout was gigantic at our caucus sites. Obama will draw so many new voters to the polls that they will swamp the Republican turnout. But if Hillary is the nominee, the Repubs will go to the polls in droves and most of those extra voters will stay home, because they were there to vote for Obama.

At the caucus I attended, new voters were a major part of the turnout, many of them young people. We stood in freezing rain and high winds for 30 minutes to OVER AN HOUR to get in, because the lines were so long, but people tolerated it because they were there for Obama, who took 9 of 11 delegates with nearly 2000 of the 2200+ votes. (Hillary took just 385 after the realignment.) Those people were there for Obama. Also, another site was closed by the fire marshal for exceeding its limits and a satellite site had to be opened to accommodate all the people who were already in line when that site had to be closed.

Kansas won't elect Hillary if she is our nominee, but it WILL elect Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
61. I wouldn't count on it.
If McCain is the Republican nominee and Obama the Democratic nominee, I think Obama can take it here. McCain came in dead last with only about 1,000 votes out of the 12,000 cast by Republicans yesterday. Mitt got over 40%. I saw Independents on the news last night who voted in the Republican poll who said they were considering voting Obama in the general, they just wanted to take the opportunity to vote against McCain.

So a lot depends on who the Republican nominee is. In Alaska, at least, we can hope that it's McCain and that our nominee is Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Yeah, we sure don't want a coastal candidate.
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 08:31 AM by Benhurst
"More than 53 percent of the nation’s population is estimated to reside on just 17 percent of the coastal strip of the U.S."

http://www.environmentwriter.org/resources/articles/1202_coasts.htm

Forget the majority of people, predominately Democratic, living along the coasts, and go for empty center of the country.

Remember what great tee shirts the republicans had of the red vs. blue states? Of course the red areas mostly contained cows; but, hey, if you control the Supreme Court, cows count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
55. I want to win so
I don't really care if that offends you. Someone who doesn't appeal to middle America can't win the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
60. I don't know about "middle" America
but she's definitely disliked up here at the "top" of America. I felt compelled to be counted for her last night at our caucus just because I felt sorry for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RL3AO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Get in line. A California win gives it to Clinton.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If Obama had won California this place would have gone NUTS. Hillary winning, no big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. If Obama had won California, Hillary's campaign would have been over! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. because Hillary is a divisive figure in this country
and her candidacy equals McCain in 08

sorry - that's how it is

and I will vote for her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yep, you all and the media keeps telling us that, but she's also wining the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. every one in my family thinks so - that's why CT went Obama
and we are media skeptics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. "her candidacy equals McCain in 08"
Clinton will drive independents to McCain.

Obama will directly attack McCains strength with independents.

A Clinton candidacy will result in a solid electoral college victory for McCain.

An Obama candidacy will result in a solid electoral college victory for Obama.

Clinton wins the primary, kiss goodbye the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. This was predicted by a great number of Hillary supporters.
Of course her winning CA would be dumbed down here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. Of course, wtf was I thinking? Around here a Clinton win is a loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
64. No, a Clinton loss is a loss! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
40. What? You mean the win that had been predicted for weeks?
Newsflash: It wasn't an "upset".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
56. Maybe that's because it was the expected result?
Other than the lefties in the Bay area, the Dems in California are a pretty lame bunch - they let Arnuld become governator, fer god's sake. The DLC has a lock on the Democratic organization there. There hasn't been a progressive to come out of CA since Jerry Brown.

So you expect a whup-de-do over her getting CA?

The REAL story is that Obama came within 10 pts of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
39. Hillary was AHEAD in CA! She was SUPPOSED to win!
Gah! Stop trying to turn your frontrunner into an underdog, it's really tiresome.

The fact that Hillary Clinton (D-Household Name) is not getting 70% of the vote in every state she runs in should be troubling to you, not a cause for celebration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Maybe it's my Newcastle optimism but I think Obama can do it
Hillary won the coastal city-states. We need a person with mass appeal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmunchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
57. What is conveniently not mentioned is that as many as 20% of the votes
were already cast in California before Obama started surging.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. 10 % === 400,000 in California. Yep, dat's close...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Edited to add vote totals. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just fyi, a lot of Obama's states were caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RL3AO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The Feb 9 states are caucuses. Good news for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yep, he should wind them handily if Hillary doesn't put a lot of people on the ground.
Caucuses have significantly different dynamics. You literally campaign at the caucus (which would be illegal at polling stations in a primary).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
45. And a lot of Muslim push polls. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
16. Awesome!
GO OBAMA!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soundguy Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. Nice Try With The Fiction
What do you say.. Drop their respective home states and do a vote count. I mean c'mon. What 65 votes to 18 looks like a lot in percentages. But really. When you have to result to using numbers this way you are bordering on delusional or perhaps desperate in your thought process. As I said drop their home states and add the popular then get back to me. I think crushing defeat is the proper term. If I were an Obama supporter I would be grabbing at straws also. However it does show the group think pattern that has been emerging in the Obama camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Obama's home-state win was more impressive than Hillary's
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 08:40 AM by ProSense
IL:
Obama 1,256,543 (65%)
Clinton 643,352 (33%)

NY:
Clinton 1,001,835 (57%)
Obama 696,876 (40%)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. She kicked his ASSS!!!!!!
Go Clinton! I am amazed at how well she did. I thought the media had it sown up for Obama.

I am happy to see that some are not swayed by MSM and hollow glitz and glamor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. The only person who kicked anyone's ass last night was McCain
unfortunately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. She won--despite the constant attacks by Obama and the media
That is a huge win, in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. That's major-league whining. Obama only led in 2 states and defeated the Clinton machine in 14. n/t
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 08:47 AM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. She won the most delegates despite the media attacks on Clinton
I am amazed. It is inspiring to think that perhaps America still has some spirit left and are not totally snowed by the glitz and glamer of the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. Your numbers are wrong! Obama did! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. if you say so
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. Thanks...
I am excited about how well she did. There were predictions that Obama would break away and win by a landslide--at least that is what I heard all last week.

So, I consider it a huge victory that Clinton came out ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. "a huge victory"
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
50. what about kicking ass?
hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. Thanks for sharing, but I bet many obama folks butts are
puckering cause of the lopsided loss in Mass.... I wrote getting the endorsement of kerry and kennedy was not going to make a difference....I will omit Carolyn Kennedy because I believe her support was real for Obama....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. So Obama had a "big" loss in one state, Hillary had a big loss in 8?? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
58. How recently did she have a 40 pt lead in MA?
And what was her margin of victory?

It looks to me more like failing to lose than winning when you experience a 30pt DROP in support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
26. I am just wondering what it means to win the Dem primary in ID, GE-wise
:shrug:

OTOH, I think if Obama wins the nomination, Clinton supporters will flock to him en masse. I am not sure about the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
46. Haha! Idaho.. i think it's worth like 7 delegates, plus a complimentary sack of potatoes!!
I do agree with you about Clinton voters going to Obama vs. Obama voters going to Clinton.

I think *most* Clinton voters will eventually vote for Obama.. because he's certainly better then McCain.

The problem is that many of Obama's voters are much more moderate.. and some of them will vote for McCain over Hillary (especially independents), and some will stay home.. and some will vote for her. But not as many as from the other side.

I think we'll need every stinking vote we can get.. one of the reasons i'm for team Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
28. how do you know for sure he won 14 states and not 13 states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
36. So, when Obama WINS - he REALLY wins.. when he loses - it's close.
When the guy has time to get into a state and get his message out (and not just depend on name recognition that Clinton already has).. he makes up HUGE HUGE margins.

Yet, many people don't think this is a guy we want to nominate?

I wish they would have asked on the exit polls for both candidates - "If the candidate you voted for today does not win the primaries, will you vote for his/her opponent in the General Election".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. if every state was Illinois!
I think the problem is that HRC is like the house furniture that you are used to whereas Obama is something new and interesting. I am more curious about the next round of states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
59. There comes a time when that old furniture just has to
be put on the curb.

It's astonishing how happy with the replacement you will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
38. I like those numbers
California notwithstanding, Sen. Obama had a great night! I think California can be reasonably explained by the advanced votes.

Things look good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elana i am Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
44. i'm still in shock this morning!
this is a complete 180 from what i was expecting.

i was an "anybody but clinton" person resigned to the eventual outcome yesterday, mostly because i wouldn't have bet that obama could have this kind of voter appeal with ANYONE considering he was pretty much unknown (and probably still is) to anyone who doesn't follow politics and hasn't paid attention to this primary season. that he could catch on against hillary is just blowing my mind. i know he gets huge crowds, but that just means his supporters are enthusiastic, that doesn't necessarily mean they are the majority.

so, yeah, i'm shocked! happy, but shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. "anybody but clinton" = republican
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
47. Excuse me but you all are not being realistic
Yes, the numbers are high but how will that translate to November?

It is going to be a long 9 months before the election. Plenty of time for voters and potential voters to hear what they don't want to hear about a candidate and decide not to vote. After this is all over candidates may all be saying that the process took too long and drained them all.

These are primaries and caucuses pitting candidates against others within their own party. Not Democrat against Republican as in the General Election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Of course the GE is Dem vs. Rep, but Dems are turning out in far larger numbers than Rep. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
52. It was caucuses that gave Obama all those states. Non-southern primaries, he doesn't do as well.
That's something to think about. There won't be any caucuses in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. no but there will be a unified democratic electorate
much more powerful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Utah was not a caucus and Obama killed her here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
62. Why the Hell take out Calfornia? 12% of the country lives there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Early voting, but no need to. The other numbers speak for themselves. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC