Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would it help Kerry to pick entire admin. before GE?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Goldom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:02 PM
Original message
Poll question: Would it help Kerry to pick entire admin. before GE?
Bush has got his whole deparment working for his re'election'... Seems to me if Kerry was prepared enough to already have chosen all his people, it would make people look at him as more 'presidential'. (frankly, a spongmonkey looks more presidential than Bush, but you know how people are...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. One school of thought...
...would say this could take some of the heat off Kerry and give the GOPers more targets to shoot at...

Could work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's appropriate to wait a while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Absolutely not.
You're saying he's too weak a candidate to sell without additional free offers.

Huge mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, we're saying this is an election like no other, and
we need to use every weapon in the arsenal. We simply can't afford to lose this one.

So--everyone knows what they're getting with Bush; time to let the Dems (and those who might be tempted to vote Dem this time) know exactly what they're getting with Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nope
The only conceivable way it could help is if he put together such a stellar list that absolutely everyone could get excited about them. Even people as wonderful as Jimmy Carter would be criticized by the Repugs. He shouldn't be creating distractions from the miserable failure of W*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nope
because most of the people who will serve in his administration already have jobs, and can't announce that they'll quit. Hypothetically, say a Senator up for reelection this fall. If he loses, he may get a job in the Kerry admin. If he wins, he won't.

Also, the cabinet has to be approved by the Senate. Some may not be approved. Not likely, but possible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. He should start with the VP in the next couple of weeks
and then announce a position or two every month. Keep the momentum and coverage going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, maybe not the ENTIRE crew...
But...if he started naming several Cabinet-level department heads, say, AFTER picking his running-mate, IMO that would help him in that it would:

A) Give people a pretty good idea of just what it is he has in mind for the nation, and

B) Give him more "surrogates" to both attack Dub & Co., and to defend his own policy ideas...i.e. spread around the offense...never a bad idea, whether it's in basketball, football, soccer, or politics!:D

AND...

C) Take a good deal of publicity away from Dub during the months leading up to the Dem. Convention. THe "down-side" of the nomination being effectively decided this early is that it has the potential to give Dub a free-and-clear P.R. field for the next four to five months...completely unacceptable to a challenger. This sort of action--one might call it naming a "Team Kerry"--would blunt that considerably.

:kick:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Utterly ridiculous...
NOBODY ever picks their cabinet prior to being elected. The election itself is enough to worry about w/o vetting cabinet choices as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I agree. This idea is stupid.
The number of people who will COMMIT to Kerry, while Kerry can only give a conditional commitment (that is, if he wins the election) is small, IMO. Why only select from those few who are willing to commit to 2005-2008 without a firm commitment that Kerry will win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. no, bush is an incompetent loser idiot asshole
he had to surround himself with people who knew things because he is an idiot. kerry is running for president and will serve as president unlike bush where there are others controlling him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silver state d Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. other........
a couple very neutral and vary popular non threatening picks might be OK but any mistakes here would be an unnecessary drag on the ticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Very bad idea. Bush will run against his choices instead of him
Most of the most qualified people could get nailed on irrelevant issues. Jesse Jackson or Jimmie Carter would make the most effective Secretary of State. But then Bush would campaign against Jackson on fidelity and against Carter on interest rates (two issues that are irrelevant to Secretary of State). If he picked Dean for anything, Bush would campaign against the Dean Scream. The issues and picking the best person for each job would get lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC