|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| Proud2BAmurkin
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:12 PM Original message |
| How did Obama manage to get STOMPED in Florida as the ONLY candidate running ads for weeks? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| fenriswolf
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. I dunno I guess hillary is just that good? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ursi
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. that's funny, I have friends down there and they said Hillary had ads |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jonnywishbone97
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. I live in the panhandle and I see OSCAMA every night |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LittleClarkie
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. So the Hillary ads they saw were all in their heads? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Proud2BAmurkin
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. yes they were because Hillary ran no ads in Florida and neither did Edwards. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tammywammy
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 33. OSCAMA??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LittleClarkie
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 34. Yeah, and he's a big poopie head as well |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KennedyGuy
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. And I talked to someone who thought they heard someone say they thought they saw a Hill ad |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LittleClarkie
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 17. Good for you. Perhaps you shouldn't listen to stuff that's 4th hand though |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KennedyGuy
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 23. those are your words..not mine |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LittleClarkie
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. Well, you're making fun of someone you don't know, calling their reliability into question |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KennedyGuy
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:25 PM Original message |
| I never did any such thing.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Little Star
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 26. Edwards and Hillary only ran state adds to obey the rules. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nailzberg
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 7. Yes, she's been running on USA and CNN |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Proud2BAmurkin
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 13. No she didn't. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Texas_Kat
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 8. Nope |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AX10
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Retail politics will be the name of the game from here on out. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Unsane
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Half the voters sent in ballots in December--largely before Obama entered the natl scene |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jonnywishbone97
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 11. wrong |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 16. Obama entered the national scene three years ago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| angie_love
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. easy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 18. Obama has very high name recognition. His is higher than Edwards' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| angie_love
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 29. .. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 31. It isn't much higher |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KaryninMiami
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Because he wasn't HERE to campaign. A few national TV ads do not really matter in the big picture. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| robbedvoter
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:20 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 20. They don't have TV, internet in Florida? newpapers? And how about them flyers? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KaryninMiami
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 27. Trust me- it was very quiet here - except from the Clinton camp for the most part. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KaryninMiami
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 28. Trust me- it was very quiet here - except from the Clinton camp for the most part. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cd3dem
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. the ads were showing his resume |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| William769
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. I guess he is just a "fairy tale". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tulkas
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Clinton Surrogates Campaigned for her |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndianaJones
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. a diverse electorate is deadly for Obama. nt. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. Deleted message |
| wisteria
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. This amounts to a no win for Senator Clinton. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Roland99
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. Were the ads Obama sponsored or some 3rd-party group? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 20th 2013, 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC