The Hill: "Edwards eyes Brokered Convention"

[Laura PourMeADrink]

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/edwards-eyes-a-brokered-convention-2008-01-29.html

Edwards eyes a brokered convention
By Alexander Bolton
Posted: 01/29/08 12:01 AM
Former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) has his sights set on playing kingmaker at the Denver convention in August, one of his most senior campaign officials hinted Monday.


While dismissing suggestions that this implied Edwards had accepted he was out of contention for the nomination, Deputy Campaign Manager Jonathan Prince said the candidate would probably get enough delegates to play a decisive role in tipping the Democratic nomination under party rules.



Party insiders could also give Edwards the nomination at a brokered convention if they judged him more electable in a match-up against GOP front-runner Sen. John McCain (Ariz.). “At a brokered convention, all bets are off,” said Prince.


Prince told reporters in a conference call that in “a worst-case scenario” Edwards would control 20 to 25 percent of the Democratic delegates heading into the convention. He predicted that Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) would each have 35 to 40 percent of the delegates, well short of half the 4,049 needed to win the nomination.


The race could leave Obama and Clinton with nearly the same number of delegates because complex rules would divide delegates evenly among candidates who win more than 30 percent in the congressional districts that make up each state.


Spokesmen for the Obama and Clinton campaigns did not respond to requests for comment.


Many political observers believe that if Edwards had the power to pick the Democratic nominee and could not grab the nomination for himself, he would throw his support to Obama. During a memorable exchange at a Democratic debate in New Hampshire this month, Edwards sided with Obama as a fellow candidate of change and drew a sharp contrast with Clinton, whom he has labeled a candidate of the status quo.


Prince argued that since nearly 800 of the delegates are so-called superdelegates and thus not bound by the results of any state primary or caucus, a candidate would have to get 60 percent of all the delegates in play to be assured of the nomination.


Prince said that Obama or Clinton would have to win nearly 80 percent of the vote in many congressional districts around the country in order to win the nomination outright — a difficult achievement considering how competitive the race has been so far.


Edwards’s campaign manager, David Bonior, said on a conference call with reporters, “We have a great shot to pick up a lot of delegates.”


But he refused to say on the conference call how Edwards would wield his delegates: “We’re not going to talk about how we’re going to use our delegates.”


Stephen Wayne, a political science professor at Georgetown University who specializes in presidential primary politics, said Edwards could help decide the nomination.

[YEM]

1. I'm sorry, but that would be BS.

Let the voters decide.

[OzarkDem]

2. Edwards is not a DC insider

So any "insiders" reporting this are making it up.

Edwards is confounding them, which is what he's supposed to do. DC insiders have become so inbred and out of touch with their base they've forgotten what a real Dem presidential candidate is.

Edwards doesn't want anything from them, they can't bribe him, they can't take his donors away. He's holding them accountable to a real policy agenda that focuses on restoring the middle class, economic growth, representative government and sanity.

A good 3 way race with a principled DC outsider is just what the Democratic party needs right now.

Thank heavens for Edwards, or we would be in for big trouble.

[nancyharris]

3. “We’re not going to talk about how we’re going to USE our delegates.”

The word "use" here is quite revealing.