Were the polls closer to the results in South Carolina?

[creeksneakers2]

South Carolina pre-election polls:

Survey USA January 23,24 = underestimated Obama score by 12 points.
Reuters/CSpan/Zogby January 22-24 = under Obama by 17 points.
Mason Dixon January 22,23 = underestimated Obama score by 17 points
Rasmussen Reports January 21 = underestimated Obama by 12 points


New Hampshire pre-election polls:

No Survey USA in New Hampshire
Reuters/CSpan/Zogby January 5-7 = underestimated Hillary by 10 points
No Mason Dixon in New Hampshire
Rasmussen January 5-7 = underestimated Hillary by nine points.

USA Today/Gallup January 4-6 = underestimated Hillary by 11 points
Strategic Vision January 4-6 = underestimated Hillary by 10 points
Fox News/Opinion Dynamics January = underestimated Hillary by 11 points.

Why is there no screaming for a recount?

[EffieBlack]

1. I thin we saw a reverse Bradley effect.

It looks like more white folks voted for Obama than the number who told pollsters they would.

[lurky]

3. Maybe social pressures are reversed in SC?

:shrug:

[Tarheel_Dem]

2. that's why I don't believe all the Super Tuesday polls showing

HRC with a seemingly insurmountable lead. Who knows what the American electorate will respond to? They certainly didn't respond to the Clintons negativity in SC.

[GreenArrow]

4. I suspect there were a lot of undecideds

between Hillary and Obama, all the way up to the time the polls opened, and they broke Obama's way.