Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM Josh Marshal: NO WAY (Clinton camp needs to be shut down on this new gambit re MI/FL delegates)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:48 PM
Original message
TPM Josh Marshal: NO WAY (Clinton camp needs to be shut down on this new gambit re MI/FL delegates)
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 05:54 PM by Pirate Smile
No Way

The Clinton camp really needs to be shut down on this new gambit of theirs to muscle the party and the other candidates into seating the Michigan and Florida delegate slates.

And let me be very clear about what I mean. It was very debatable decision whether the DNC should have punished Florida and Michigan with the loss of their delegates slates because they broke the rules the party had set down for scheduling their primaries. By 'debatable' I don't mean it was right or wrong, only that it was a pretty draconian move and I know there was a lot of discussion about whether or not it was the right thing to do.

But that was the decision -- one that each of the candidates at least implicitly agreed to. Indeed, each agreed not to campaign in either of these states, again implicitly agreeing to the decision not to seat the delegates.

The Clinton camp is just pushing to seat these delegates now because the contingencies of the moment mean that the decision would favor Hillary. She was the only one whose name was on the ballot in Michigan, thus insuring her win. She has a wide lead in every Florida poll taken this month.

Even that was a matter of her basically pulling a fast one on the other candidates by not taking her name off the ballot. Each of the major candidates signed a pledge not to "campaign or participate" in any primary or caucus prior to Feb. 5th except for Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina. The other major candidates adopted what seems like the only reasonable interpretation of the pledge (see text here) and pulled their names from the ballot.

But then Hillary didn't, thus in essence guaranteeing her win in Michigan.

The Clinton campaign said taking their name off the ballot wasn't required by the pledge. But what can "participate" mean over and above "campaigning" other than formally being a candidate in the race?

In any case, by gaming the process Clinton already insured her win in Michigan, though it seemed only for a symbolic victory, not real delegates.

But all these particulars are secondary to the principle, which is that you don't change the rules in midstream to favor one candidate or another. This is no more than a replay, with different factual particulars, of the attempt to outlaw the at-large caucuses in Nevada after the Culinary Union endorsement made it appear they would help Barack Obama.

Perhaps there's some detail of this question that I'm not aware of. And if there is I'll revise my opinion accordingly. But based on what I know now this is pretty clear-cut.

Hillary can muscle for every advantage she wants. Good for her. She's a fighter. But everyone else should see this for what it is and say No.

--Josh Marshall

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/064801.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Again They'll do anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. When Hillary said she was "in it to win it," she evidently meant at any cost--just like the Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
75. it sure appears someone slipped them rove's playbook. I don't get where the media is saying
that it's causing whites to pull for Clinton. The whites I know are all appalled at these GOP tactics. You don't have to believe the Clintons are racist to understand why they are using this-they put winning ahead of any concept of civility and integrity. Is this really who we want to lead our country? I find it despicable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. She gets more loathsome every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. You said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who cares what some Obama bot blogger says?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I am really getting tired of your ****
perhaps you should disclose that you are on her payroll - nothing else would explain the crap that you have been posting and the attacks you've made on people here.

If anyone says something factual about your girl, you are right there. without shame, facts, rational argument or cites.

yo may be proud, but I wonder if you have any shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Who are you responding to?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. the non-stop anti- edwards, anti-obama, hillarian
who finds the time and a way to go after anyone who disagrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Thank you for narrowing it down.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. well, every Obama supporter will---post over me and below me with the mantra:
she will do anything. not Original at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. bwahahahaha
sorry, dumpling, Josh Marshall is not an "Obamabot" and he's not jus some blogger. Get ready for some blowback you darling little Hellbot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. you are the world's best parody
Josh Marshall hasn't taken sides in this. In fact, he probably leans to Hilary.

But don't let that stop you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Josh Marshall is neither an Obama, Clinton or Edwards supporter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. You really are clueless, mate.
Stop spreading so much bullshit and educate yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. more people than would ever care what you say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Thou shalt not speaketh cross against JMM. For it reveals..
YOUR lack of maturity and judgement. JMM is one of the most if not THE MOST reliable blogger in the entire blogosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. nobody knows who that is or cares
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. proof of your ignorance
Finish high school and then get back to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
59. Nah, he's just the guy who broke the US Attorney Firing scandal...
...that's all.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. Man, you've been posting about a thousand threads an hour for days! I thought you WERE a robot!
I don't know how you do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #42
69. "a thousand threads an hour for days"
The irony meter just flipped all the way to one side and broke. Can DU's biggest spammer and Hillary-bot be surprised at anyone's one day post count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
51. You're so cute
I love it went you spout crap you obviously no nothing about.

:loveya: Adding you to my buddy list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Again who is it?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. dude, just log out and check the thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #57
64. My *new* favorite poster
Who's a Proud Amurkin. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
70. Josh Marshall is NOT an "Obama bot blogger"
I'm rather surprised that you seem unfamiliar with Talking Points Memo. One of the largest political blogs out there. And, if I remember correctly, he's a Clinton supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
81. When I read your comment,
I heard (in my head) a sound-drop from The Stephanie Miller Show: "You are an idiot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
82. Thank you for continuing to win people over to Obama with every post you make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clear as a bell to me, too. She'll say or do anything; very cutthroat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pretty sure that it was planned this way...
else why say you are going along with the DNC decision but leave your name on the ballot in Michigan?

After all, you can win those delegations and THEN try to get them into the convention.

Rules were made for losers (Clinton's new motto).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Apparently no one told Hillary it was illegal.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 06:09 PM by arewenotdemo
So it must be OK.

:sarcasm:

She and Bill are throwing African-Americans and progressives under the Clinton bus.

And when it comes to Iraq, McCain will demolish her. She may be good for another 50 years or so (Korea), but he's in for a millenium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
58. There was no agreement
and no obligation to remove their names from the Michigan ballot.

Some of the candidates did so on their own, in attempt to pander to Iowa and New Hampshire voters.

But Kucinich, Dodd and Biden remained on the ballot - and Kucinich even campaigned there, in violation of the agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennifer C Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #58
63. No, he didn't.
Biden removed his name from the Michigan ballot, along with Edwards, Obama, and Richardson.

You must be confusing him with Gravel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. WAAAHHHH! So just let Obama come out and say he doen't want Florida votes to count
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. ha ha--oh my--that would really put the kinker on this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. only a fool or a knave
would suggest this comes from Obama. Or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
83. Florida votes should not count
THe people of Florida have repeatedly proven themselves unworthy of the franchise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, who cares about voters? Party squabbles is all...Idiots all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. It really doesn't matter anyway. None of it matters. Obama is going
to lose all the big states anyway. This whole thing was for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Incredible.
Their stunts have pushed me WAY beyond not supporting her for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. No kidding.
She's unbelievable. When I saw her after the debate claiming, "I never mentioned Reagan," I couldn't believe my eyes. Now this. She's sunk to a new low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yea know, the Beltway is much more ruthless than any
Democratic Primary Run. One has to go get into the strategic "fight mode" to make any progress with the Pentagon, FBI, CIA etc.....every waking moment. If you blink, they will cut and have you bleeding.

This article is an excellent example of a political team familiar with the needed savvy to lead such an arrogant group of "Leading Americans in Power".

You got to go to the edge and lean over a bit. Yea, ya do and the Clinton Team knows this too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DEMorthem Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. she WILL do anything to win
an that scares the shit out of me! she is "politics as usual" " same old washington bullshit " is that REALLY what we want? not me! I would rather have ANOTHER republican in 08 than HILLERY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Sure, because the DC status quo has been working so well for the country.
Haven't had enough cynical bullshit yet? Vote Clinton for more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. Watch her - she'll litigate it.
She'll litigate her way to the nomination, mark my words. She's learned every lesson Rove had to offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. Josh is young and he thought Clinton was a "good President" and
because he's the President he knew through his "Teenage Aware" life...he would support going back to Clintonimics. I understand that...but his "growing up experience" under Clinton...is just as obfuscating to HIS view of THIS election as the folks who support Obama because they thought Reagan was a Happy Fellow...and while they might not have agreed with all his policies..they thought he was better than Carter and the "60's Hippie Crowd."

Josh is a good guy...but his view is clouded by Clinton...because it was what he knew in his "OWN LIFE EXPERIENCE!" ...even with his degree in HISTORY from Brown University.

Josh is a good guy...but very young......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. i'm curious
why did she come out now for this, instead of next month, or even a month before the convention?

There will be no decision on seating the delegates before the FL vote, so what's the point of bringing this up
now in the first place?

Even if you look it as being a good move by her, why now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
32. i live in Florida, and i'm beyond angry that our own party disenfranchised us -- NOW, it's not just
disenfranchisment, but they are going to effectively STEAL our delegates and give them to Hillary. NO ONE has campaigned here. there has been NO "democratic" process. of course the candidate with the biggest name recognition is going to win a popular vote: THAT'S NOT DEMOCRATIC IN THE LEAST.

as much as it pains me to say this, Michigan and Florida delegates need to sit this one out. it's better that we have NO VOICE than to have a phony, manipulated voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. It's delegate theft, you're exactly right.
As Howard Wolfson says ad nauseum, it's BEYOND THE PALE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
68. YES even without this story what are they thinking demotivating voters in these states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. Josh Marshall has discredited himself...
he has shown that he is a Hillary hater and pro-Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Actually Josh has much support for Clintons. He posted on his site...he liked Bill
because he didn't think he did a bad job. Josh is in his early 30's. Clinton was a good President to him.

He posted it on his Blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
38. This is ridiculous! Disenfranchise voters in 2 whole states?
What happened to "count every vote"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #38
52. It's about "the rules." Some people here thing the "rules" subervet fairness.
The system we have in place is not fair by any stretch of the imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
41. Sorry, Josh Marshall is FOS. He knows nothing about voting rights.
It's not about the candidates. It's about the voters. As long as there is a nominating process based on direct selection of delegates to a political party convention then voting rights must be equal for all.

It doesn't matter what the national or state Democratic leaders decided. It's what the rank and file Democrats decide and that decision on election day must be honored - equally across the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
43. Josh Marshall is a RIGHT WING REPUKE!!!!
c'mon Hillbots....we know you want to say it....

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. :)
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. Josh is NOT a RW Repuke...he has a "support" for Bill...cause he was President when he grew up...
Nothing wrong with that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
45. Hillary's going to have a full-on Democratic mutiny if she's not more careful
I am trying real hard to keep myself open to supporting her, but bogus tactics like this make me physically ill at the thought she might actually connive her way to the presidency. Would it kill her to show a little integrity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Where would she find it? Lack of integrity is her Achilles heel.
There's no spine there, no core beliefs, no principles. It's all about winning and nothing else matters. It's all about HILLARY and no one else matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
47. There's fighters and there's Thugs and hilary
is the latter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Yap, yap, yap, yap...Y'all know that Hillary was not the only Dem candidate...
to keep her name on the Michigan ballot. I sure don't see anyone badmouthing Dennis for leaving his...or even for his actively campaigning in Michigan.

It really is a shame when state party leaders decide to abrogate an agreement made by all the state parties just to gain some extra campaign dollars by going first.

As for Florida, it really doesn't matter since they have no idea about how to hold an honest election--in Florida, anything goes.

But to single out Hillary for the acts of state Party officials is beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. hilary's a thug so don't try your red herrings
on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
50. They should be seated. If you don't want them seated, then you don't want their votes to count.
The system we have in place is flawed. It allows two-three states to decide the victor, and snubs the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. why is this loathsome?
What the hell is with such vitriolic hate? Good God, what the hell is wrong with everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
54. Hillary 2008: Whatever it Takes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #54
61. You missed the two words at the end of her slogan 'And Beyond' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
56. I was surprised to find JMM writing this commentary. He says it well. nt
NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
62. "Do anything, say anything." "In it to win it." Hmmmm....
As a Democrat, don't I WANT someone like that, who has an instinct for the jugular, when the Democrats have (at least officially) LOST 7 out of the last 10 presidential elections? Like, only won 3?)

In the words of Hillary's favorite candidate in 1964 --- "Why not victory?"
Everyone seems to be so much up on "change" this year. How about winning? Wouldn't that be a nice change? Hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #62
71. "Victory" using these low-life tactics and lies is not victory
The Clintons are doing huge damage to the Democratic Party, and to themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
65. This is getting crazy. Even bush is starting to look democratici every vote counts in democracy...
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 03:46 AM by cooolandrew
... Sorry I'm backing Cynthia if it's not Edwards or Obama,I can't back an election fraud candidate, it's how we got here. Besisdes if Repubs get it they get the blame for economic decline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
66. Anyone in florida who believes in the constitution vote uncommitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Email this about I think they are doing it on the quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
72. Florida and Michigan should be represented at the convention.
Hillary aside, they were always going to work this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
73. I Live In Florida And Know The Facts
I don't think it's fair to Hillary to run artucles about her that distort the facts. If people are concerned with the truth they should fact-check before believing everything they read by a reporter or a blogger.

The fact is the DNC along with the Democrat candidates signed a contract to disallow delegates as well as no campaigning or running ads in florida.

Barack has been running campaign ads in florida for the past 2 weeks on CNN every 3 or 4 hours and this was disallowed. When you run a campaign ad on CNN you are able to block any state from receiving the ad, which he chose not to do in florida. Barack is circumventing the DNC contract by running these ads.

On the ballots in florida every democrat candidate is listed and we can still vote for any of them just that our vote doesn't count. Also, because Barack has been running these ads in florida people know who he is. When the original post states Hillary leads 2 to 1 over Barack that is simply not true, she leads at the most by 5 to 7 %. I'm a bit surprised that a Barack supporter would even admit Hillary leads Barack by a margin of 2 to 1 in florida because if that were the case it is a good indicator of Hillary's popularity.

That being said, Hillary has asked, not directed the DNC to let floridians voice be heard which actually means let the votes in florida count. Is this breaking any rules, no it isn't.

To get to the meat of my post. Hillary asking the DNC to allow florida votes count, is this pandering for delegats, sure it is. Barack running ads in florida circumventing the DNC contract, is this pandering, sure it is.

Of the 3 candidates, John has been the only candidate not involved in any issues in florida that I am aware of and I applaud him for that.

I am a Hillary supporter but I have to give credit to John for not pandering in florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #73
84. Here's a clue.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 04:52 AM by drm604
It's "Democratic Candidate", not "Democrat Candidate". You'll be more believable it you stay away from the right-wing slurs. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyldRogue Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
74. It's a sad state to see the Dems...
...so divided (thanx to Rovian tactics by ALL parties ) that now voters are gonna vote based NOT on RACE instead of experience. So far from what I gather, Obama WILL get the majority of the black vote because of why else?? He's now the BLACK candidate. Ignore the fact that he's been wishy washy concerning critical votes or the fact he's only been in the Senate for 3 years..... Oprah sure did a good job promoting the 'agenda' huh?

And I am willing to bet that more black voters will vote THIS time around. If they had voted before, maybe the Shrub would not have had the office twice... shame.

Well people, you vote and you get what you deserve if he indeed turns out to be the closet Republican I and quite a few other suspect he really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Well can you blame Obama if he wins?
I didn't like Reagan but our political system helped usher him in.

And if this country had campaign finance reform the field wouldn't have narrowed so soon.

Dodd, Richardson, Biden, all gone, and it is not even February 1st.

By february 6th we will know who our candidate is - and perhaps so many will be tired on both sides of the two who are "Ordained and anointed" that the notion of having the primaries over so soon will backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Allyoop Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
77. DNC
The DNC is the only arm of the Democratic Party that I have supported since 2004. I don't contribute to the DCCC or DSCC because I can't stand the manipulation by the leaders. I support Howard Dean and all he has done to establish the 50 State campaign.

If the DNC lets Billary get by with this temper tantrum and get her way, I'm through with the Democratic Party! It's just as corrupt and corporate as the Repubs. We The People don't exist - only the folks with big bucks and deep pockets count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. I have an absentee ballot of florida
Looking at my absentee ballot I see Barack, Hillary and even Edwards is on it. What does this mean for tuesday? People in the democrat party can vote for any of these candidates. How will this be an advantage for Hillary? Well, perhaps the Obama supporters are in fear that Florida supports Hillary? I think not. Considering Barack is the only candidate running campaign ads and breaking the DNC contract should be a red flag that he is cheating the DNC and what type of ethics does this exhibit to people. Has Hillary broken any contract with the DNC by suggesting the florida voters be heard, no, she hasn't. That said, the mere fact she suggested it is enough to proclaim her enemy of the state but the fact Barack actually broke the DNC contract for no campaign ads in florida is perfectly OK? Seems to me it's what I call double standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
79. Seating Delegates
Not to worry. Howard Dean will not buy that stuff. He has guts enough and will back the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. How I Feel ! ! !
Well, I feel cheated that my vote doesn't count. In a free democracy where voting is encouraged, I feel the DNC has let the people of Florida down.

I think my main issue in this campaign cycle is health care for all americans. It just sickens me that so many people don't have health care or are underinsured. It just takes one major illness to send a family to the poor house. I think because I'd like to vote so my voice can be heard for healthcare for all people I don't think it was fair for the DNC to disallow floridians a vote. Just my RANT ! ! !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
85. It makes Clinton look desperate and disingenuous.
Most people will see through it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
86. The Clintons would destroy the Democratic Party in the process
of seeking the nomination. Their scorched-earth tactics aren't just against Edwards and Obama, they're against our party itself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC