|
I must read about the Clintons' reign of evil 50 times a day here. When I try to get answers about actual events, I get the same five or six trivial answers: The blowjob. The marijuana joke. The smackdown of the GOP prosecutor (what 'is' is). NAFTA. The smackdown of the GOP over the welfare bill.
In short, a couple of (possible) policy failures and a swift boatload of spin originating with anti-Clinton lefties like Cockburn and St Claire and Hitchens, who still scream bloody murder about Al Gore, too. Capitol Hill grousing, gossip, and grudges. And links to the "me, too!" crowd writing to please their peer group.
You have no case about voter suppression; in Nevada especially, incidents were reported on all sides. But if you do, provide some actionable evidence that a grand jury can be empaneled to investigate. And you have no case about race-baiting, although you yourselves are quick to scream it from the rooftops, in full throat, and often.
Hillary could make these very same non-cases. And if you were correct about Hillary as a master liar, she would be spending her energy on serious dirty tricks. But making two or three verbal blunders per week is not a profile of deceit, and being able to deal with electoral attacks is not the vice of the hell-bound.
When you win a state, you gloat like pro wrestlers; when you lose, you scream that your votes have been stolen. And you scream "corporate!" just to hear yourselves scream. Appealing to sympathy has turned into Obama's primary political modus operandi, and if he doesn't apply a little of that "change" and "hope" to his OWN candidacy, the whining will destroy him. He will, at length, convince the voters that he really is too weak to deal with even mild election-time combat.
But unlike Obama's supporters' behavior toward Hillary, damn few of us Hillary defenders will gloat. Barack Obama is an excellent candidate making a potentially fatal mistake. And, yes, I will likewise express my concerns to those who DO gloat over his potential self-destruction.
Since you have no case whatsoever, you are down to trying to invoke shame. If Hillary wins the nomination, you will bolt from the party -- and Obama has already spoken about that possibility. And this is MY fault, how?
I'm defending two of the best statespeople the Democratic Party has ever produced from the sensation-seeking, slogan-chanting, gossipy, whining branch of the Left that would rather be hip, arch, and ironic, and whine about "the sheeple", than actually take responsibility for changing what's wrong with this world. No, unlike Barack Obama, the Clintons are not perfect, but I have no hunger for perfection. Nor I am seeking a Leader or a rock star to inspire me. I want a President who can run the affairs of state with a modicum of intelligence and respect, someone whom I have a chance of lobbying when I disagree with policy.
And I want a president who won't whine and present him or herself as a poor waif at the mercy of a mean and cruel world. If a murderous tyrant like Saddam Hussein can spit in the eye of the world ten seconds before his execution, an American president ought to at least be able to laugh off the excesses of a campaign season. I may vote for Hillary, but I still want to be able to pull the lever for Barack Obama with confidence and pride on November 9th of this year should he win -- or in the future should he fail.
--p!
|