Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama praises Reagan but considers Paul Wellstone a "gadfly"? Involved in anti-populist Rubin group?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:27 PM
Original message
Obama praises Reagan but considers Paul Wellstone a "gadfly"? Involved in anti-populist Rubin group?
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 07:34 PM by jackson_dem
-snip-

Obama's deference to these boundaries was hammered home to me when our discussion touched on the late Senator Paul Wellstone. Obama said the progressive champion was "magnificent." He also gently but dismissively labeled Wellstone as merely a "gadfly," in a tone laced with contempt for the senator who, for instance, almost single-handedly prevented passage of the bankruptcy bill for years over the objections of both parties. This clarified Obama's support for the Hamilton Project, an organization formed by Citigroup chair Robert Rubin and other Wall Street Democrats to fight back against growing populist outrage within the party. And I understood why Beltway publications and think tanks have heaped praise on Obama and want him to run for President. It's because he has shown a rare ability to mix charisma and deference to the establishment.

-snip-

Another area of retreat and equivocation for Obama is his role in party politics. He had previously said he didn't "want to be the kingmaker," because "it's never been sort of a role that I've aspired to in politics." Yet Obama forcefully intervened in a suburban Chicago Congressional primary on behalf of Iraq veteran Tammy Duckworth, the candidate handpicked by Democratic power brokers, against grassroots contender Christine Cegelis, who in 2004 garnered an astonishing 44 percent against GOP incumbent Henry Hyde and who almost beat Duckworth. Wasn't this the very kingmaking role he'd said he didn't want to be a part of? Obama said only, "There are going to be strategic questions about who do I think is best equipped to win the general elections." One senior Congressional aide said, "Obama showed himself to be the pure political hack he is. Here you have a guy whose own success was predicated on winning primaries against party-backed candidates now using his enormous political capital to go to bat for the same party machines he says he doesn't want to be a tool of."

Although Obama said such high-profile primary endorsements were rare, a similar controversy arose a few weeks later. Just as Ned Lamont's antiwar primary campaign against prowar Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman was gaining momentum, Obama traveled to the state to endorse Lieberman. Like the Duckworth endorsement, Obama's move was timed to derail an insurgent, grassroots candidate. To progressives this may seem surprising, given Obama's progressive image. But remember, according to the New York Times it is Lieberman--one of the most conservative, prowar Democrats in Washington--who is "Obama's mentor in the Senate as part of a program in which freshman senators are paired with incumbents."

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060626/sirota/3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very telling article. Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sirota, the man who likes Huckabee, AND" Obama said the progressive champion was "magnificent."
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 07:32 PM by Mass
Sirota could not even be bothered to give us a quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. GADFLY: One that acts as a provocative stimulus.
And that was Paul Wellstone and then some, and we could use more gadflies like him. RIP :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. if the story is true
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 07:37 PM by HawkeyeX
Then Obama rises a little bit higher on my list - but still a *very distant* 2nd. I miss Paul.

On edit: read the definition of gadfly after I posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Read the definition of gadfly. Nothing dismissive in it, particularly when added to magnificent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
74. Holy shit the spin is amazing. AMAZING! WOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
76. This is hardly a compliment
Gadfly is not complimentary - maybe you should check a dictionary instead of wikipedia

Obama said the progressive champion was "magnificent." He also gently but dismissively labeled Wellstone as merely a "gadfly," in a tone laced with contempt for the senator

what part of laced with contempt seems like a compliment

Barack Obama is no Paul Wellstone...and he will not get my vote in the primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Gadfly definition:
Definitions of gadfly on the Web:

* pest: a persistently annoying person
* any of various large flies that annoy livestock
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

* "Gadfly" is a term for people who upset the status quo by posing upsetting or novel questions, or attempt to stimulate innovation by proving an irritant.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (social)

* Gadfly is a RDBMS written in Python.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (database)

* The gadfly appears in Greek mythology as a tormenter to Io, the heifer maiden. Zeus lusts after Io and eventually turns her into a white heifer to hide her from his jealous wife, Hera. Hera is not fooled, and demands Io as a gift from Zeus. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (mythology)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
52. I think it's in Plato's "Phaedo", but maybe it's the "Apology"
It's what Plato called Socrates. It's a compliment, as you point out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Everything you ever wanted to know about Obama but were afraid to ask...ask Lieberman..
"But remember, according to the New York Times it is Lieberman--one of the most conservative, prowar Democrats in Washington--who is "Obama's mentor in the Senate as part of a program in which freshman senators are paired with incumbents."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Which has nothing to do with the article
Obama intervened when Lieberman was teetering on the edge. He showed his cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. So did Boxer and Clinton... And at this point Liebeman was not teetering.
Most people did not think Lamont would pass the convention. Rewrite history is a habit with some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Rewrite history? When was the article written? You obviously didn't read it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. how pathetic that Sirota's such a dishonest little hack
I never liked him. Bernie must be deeply ashamed of him. What a flat out liar. And lover of Huckabee. Obama's comments on
Wellstone couldn't have been more admiring, and he never remotely praised Reagan. I rate Sirota about as highly as that other well known progressive: Roseanne Barr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
springhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
101. You are famous for calling people names with whom you diagree..................
you have a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Again, a vague statement with a possible pejorative/positive intention
Gadfly can be used to mean a provocative challenger of the status quo, or an irritating contrary nuisance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. And what is a MAGNIFICENT gadfly then which is what Obama actually said?
Still confused?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. You'll think me a magnificent bastard, but you still can't claim to divine intent from that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. No, I just think you are trying to ram the possibility he meant something different down throats.
When it is clear from the preceding adjective precisely what he meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. When did he say that? You are making up a quote out of whole cloth to defend Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. You need to examine your ammunition before you lob it -- That is what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. It isn't. The Nation's interview clearly separates the two.
First praise, then dismissal, according to the author of the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Not an article, an OPINION COLUMN. Can you make the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Did you read the original interview from 2006? There's no whole "quote" to be found.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 07:55 PM by jpgray
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. And do you always set your watch by opinion pieces?
I tend to base my analysis on actual quotes rather than third party interpretations. But that's me.

Sirota has already been spanked for this, for not reporting Obama's entire quote and his faulty analysis based on that omission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
55. It's only negative if you've never bothered to pick up a copy of Plato
Then again, that's probably 90% of America today, sadly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #55
72. Your condescension is unwarranted. Its usage history goes rather beyond Plato
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 08:09 PM by jpgray
From the OED, you will find positive and pejorative uses in the figurative meaning:

2. fig. One who irritates, torments, or worries another. Also (after L. {oe}strus), an irresistible impulse to some course of action.

1649 G. DANIEL Trinarch., Hen. IV, cccxlvii, Rather then have the Gad-flyes of an ill-Disposed Army on their shoulders feed.

1807-8 W. IRVING Salmag. (1824) 243 It is our misfortune to be frequently pestered..by certain critical gad-flies.

1864 LOWELL Fireside Trav. 314 Bitten with the Anglo-Saxon gadfly that drives us all to disenchant artifice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. I frigging hate
these Hillary Clinton workers here at DU-they are ruining this once great site. I haven't seen behavior like this since Karl Rove ran Bush the 2nd time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. The OP is supporting John Edwards,
and I'll take issue with your Hillary Clinton workers BS. That's the second time that someone's insinuated that today. Clinton's supporters are no worse than any other group here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. I'm supporting Edwards, and I'm not impressed by Obama
Obama is not a progressive by any means of the term.

I've been researching ALL our candidates and Obama is short on my list of his progressiveness.

I think everyone here is doing a disservice to their candidates by ALL this juvenile sparring.

I wish Duers would just post about their candidates and why they support them. From some of the crap I've seen posted on DU, I would be ashamed if their candidates came here and saw how their supporters are behaving.

I think another factor is there are a lot of first time voters who think the politics of destruction is a good thing. I don't agree. It makes them look petty and in some cases very uninformed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
80. Paranoid much? The majority of this site supports Edwards. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Interesting article. My preferences: (1st) Edwards, (2nd) Hillary,
and (3rd) Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. I heard he also called him a homosapien!
Gadfly: a good thing that sounds bad when you first hear the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. There are pejorative uses of the word. It depends on intent
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 07:43 PM by jpgray
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. No mention of Wellstone ins his book, although Reagan is praised in it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Obama said the progressive champion was "magnificent."
I do not think there is any question what the intent was.

This said, it is once again the distortion by another candidate supporter of what Obama said. It is becoming a pattern that is very bothering. Apparently, Clinton and Edwards's supporters have more and more difficulties supporting their candidate without lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. To his fans, I'm sure the search for intent usually ends with such positive results
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Sure, coming from a guy who said that Huckabee was good, (Sirota), I am going to listen
something he does not even have a quote for....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
77. You've said Sirota has said Huckabee was good
several times - mind providing a link or some proof - I happen to like David Sirota a lot and please and I would love this Sirota thinks Huckabee is good with some context...

oh I'll go check the googles....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. Is there another meaning to that word?
Maybe it's a bad thing, and we've missed it, what with the new lingo kids use these days and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. What gets me is that they cannot be bothered to produce a quote, these days.
It just shows how some people are desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
60. Why do you hate Socrates? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. He called Wellstone "magnificent." Sirota is a hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. To those who presuppose the most beneficent intent for all Obama's statements
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 07:51 PM by jpgray
I'm sure it'd be easy to get very confused as to how "gadfly" could possibly be read as pejorative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. While this may come as a shock, "could possibly" and "was" are not the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Give me a quote and I will tell you. If not, I just will consider that for what it is. Hacks doing
their dirty job. I will not believe them, whether they attack Obama, Clinton, or Edwards. A question of basic honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
35. OMG...he endorsed LIEBERMAN? He called the greatest Progressive, EVER, a GADFLY?
Damn. Here I thought his play nice with repukes rhetoric was bad. That's nothing compared to this. How shameful. I also didn't know he was involved in getting rid of Cegelis! SHE would have won the freakin' seat! Now I know who my 2nd choice candidate is. This makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. He called Wellstone "magnificent." And he endorsed Lamont in the general. Plus,
Lamont endorsed Obama recently, so it seems those two are cool by each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. To anyone who hadn't decided on utter fealty, that would be evidence of equivocation
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 07:57 PM by jpgray
Not pure goodness and honesty. Why attempt to squash Lamont in the primary? Why do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Ask Lamont how he feels about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. Of course. It's not equivocation? It's all consistent in your mind?
Are you being serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. I disagree with his primary endorsement of Lieberman. However, your
respect for Mr. Lamont cannot be that great if you are willing to completely disregard his opinion in the affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #62
73. Lamont's opinion of Obama makes his support of Lieberman both consistent and positive?
How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. You could start by examining what I have actually said, as opposed to what you
might have wished to construe me as saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. I asked "Why endorse Lieberman at all?"
You said "Ask Lamont how he feels about it."

How does that even answer the question? It's ridiculous. It would be like using a wounded Iraq war vet who supports Hillary to explain away her IWR vote: "This guy was hurt by her vote, yet supports her! Ask -him- how he feels about it!" Those who were hurt by a mistake can still like the person who made the mistake. This doesn't mean it isn't a mistake. It's great that Lamont is big enough not to be petty over the Lieberman support, but how does that make the choice to support Lieberman any less wrong? What a ridiculous argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. Do you have a link?
If true, it shows once again Obama's knack for "shapeshifting", saying whatever he thinks any given crowd wants to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Read the OP!!!!! It is in it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #53
66. What was Obama's full quote? And what was the question that led to the answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I know, but even with Sirota very partial quotes,only a hack can conclude he is belittling Wellstone
Seems there is a lot of hacks on DU, that is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Right. Sirota gives a one-word "quote," and everyone goes OMG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #53
84. The hell you say
OMG, now you're expecting me to actually read the articles linked in the OP????? OMFG!!!

Just kidding. Thanks for the heads up. That's what happens when I try to post and work at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. It's in the OP. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. No quote, no context, no question, nothing. Just "I heard Obama say gadfly."
Sirota's a hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. He also called him a Gadfly and endorsed Lieberman in the Primary when it was OBVIOUS who THE PEOPLE
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 07:59 PM by in_cog_ni_to
wanted as their Senator.

He also gently but dismissively labeled Wellstone as merely a "gadfly," in a tone laced with contempt for the senator who, for instance, almost single-handedly prevented passage of the bankruptcy bill for years over the objections of both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. Since Sirota refuses to give the whole quote or context, we have no idea what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ordinaryaveragegirl Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. Tells me where Obama stands...
When he supports someone like LIEberman (who betrayed his own party and stood with Chimp).

Wellstone's legacy easily puts Obama to shame. Wellstone was for change before it became a catch phrase, and was about that change coming from the people - he was a true visionary. What a great inspiration he was to so many!

“When too many Americans don't vote or participate, some see apathy and despair. I see disappointment and even outrage. And I believe that out of this frustration can come hope and action.” -Paul Wellstone, in a 1998 speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. There's no quote, and no reference. Sirota is a hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. The reference is the interview Sirota did with Obama in 2006. Have you read it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. And you, before you accuse!! Incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. I haven't seen the full interview anywhere; just Sirota claiming Obama used the word "gadfly."
No context, no quote = hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
56. That's probably why he praised Wellstone so highly
I think you may not understand what "gadfly" means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #56
69. Here...take your pick:
Definitions of gadfly on the Web:

* pest: a persistently annoying person
* any of various large flies that annoy livestock
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

* "Gadfly" is a term for people who upset the status quo by posing upsetting or novel questions, or attempt to stimulate innovation by proving an irritant.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (social)

* Gadfly is a RDBMS written in Python.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (database)

* The gadfly appears in Greek mythology as a tormenter to Io, the heifer maiden. Zeus lusts after Io and eventually turns her into a white heifer to hide her from his jealous wife, Hera. Hera is not fooled, and demands Io as a gift from Zeus. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (mythology)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #69
90. Show me an example of someone calling someone else a gadfly
and meaning it as anything other than a compliment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
44. Obama is in the wrong party
He needs to give in to his inner Republican and switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
48. Someone needs to learn the history of the term "gadfly"
It's only insulting if you consider it insulting to be called a latter-day Socrates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #48
61. Its usage has been pejorative in many cases.
It can be a provocative challenger of the status quo, an irritating nuisance, or somewhere in between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. As I said before, show me a perjorative use of it
I've never seen one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. Here:
Definitions of gadfly on the Web:

* pest: a persistently annoying person
* any of various large flies that annoy livestock
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

* "Gadfly" is a term for people who upset the status quo by posing upsetting or novel questions, or attempt to stimulate innovation by proving an irritant.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (social)

* Gadfly is a RDBMS written in Python.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (database)

* The gadfly appears in Greek mythology as a tormenter to Io, the heifer maiden. Zeus lusts after Io and eventually turns her into a white heifer to hide her from his jealous wife, Hera. Hera is not fooled, and demands Io as a gift from Zeus. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadfly (mythology)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #64
75. I've provided one above. Your unitary focus on Plato shows how dangerous a little learning can be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
63. Obama needs to read everything ever spoken or written by Paul Wellstone. This is a man
who actually got what government should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. Maybe you've seen Obama's quote in which he says Wellstone's a gadfly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
79. Paul Wellstone was the antithesis of the Clintons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
82. I mostly agree but how is backing Duckworth like blocking Lamont?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #82
93. Wasn't DU very pro-Duckworth?
I seem to recall that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. That's what I remember, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
83. I thought I wasn't in favor of Obama. Anyone who so vaguely speaks
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 08:51 PM by higher class
of Wellstone by using a term that is not a household word, that has too many meanings, that infers a flighty darter in one part of it, who is uppity by using it - and leaves you wondering what the hell he meant .... IS - NOT the right candidate for me. Combine that with the sainthood he confers on Reagan. Combine that with always having to explain himself. Combine that with his hugging the corporations. Means, my initial gut feeling of restraint was correct.

I don't think Dems are that fortunate right now. The two top contenders - have
War ... Corporations .... Center and leaning towards the love of the right on their side.

Edwards looks better by the second and minute.

Paul Wellstone IS a hero of mine.
He wasn't magnificent.
He was dedicated, determined, serious, loving, energetic, charismatic, honest, ferocious on our behalf, unafraid, and one of the best representatives a citizen could ask for.

I am feeling sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. so
you're saying Wellstone wasn't magnificent? How dare you.

See how this works?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. Not really. Magnificent is vague and short-cut jargo . I defined what he was to me in simple words
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 09:31 PM by higher class
that didn't require a dictionary and a debate for meaning.

'Magnificent' is a fancier word than 'awesome', but could be understood to carry the same meaning or the same impressiveness.

I didn't include any reference to Sirolas' words about 'contempt' - so I didn't play that game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. BUT
I took one sentence you said. Eliminated all other comments, and made it look like you said he wasn't magnificent.

And you can't really complain, because i'm quoting you accurately.

Just trying to prove a point about context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #88
92. OK. I get it. I took a shortcut. Dangerous. You're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #83
94. Um, I'm a Hillarite, but --
1) What makes you say "gadfly" is "not a household word?" What does that mean? How is gadfly such a complicated and obscure piece of vocabulary in your mind?

2) But then your vocabulary is pretty shaky yourself: (should be "that IMPLIES a flighty darter" NOT "that INFERS.")

3) And you find him "uppity" for using "gadfly?" Uppity? Let me ask you, do you feel that anyone who got over 300 on the verbal SAT is "not black enough?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #94
95. I honor your opinions and can see how you would voice them ...
1/3. the meaning of gadfly and how Obama meant it was debated within this thread. It is not a word from the street or in most homes.

My back went up when I read 'gadfly'. I ignored the rest of the phrase that came from Sirota about contempt because there was no film or full context for me to look at or read.

In my experience - I have seen gadfly used in relation to a person who is always stirring things. I've observed the stereotype (for me) written into some theatrical and comedic scripts. I didn't take his use of it in postive terms. I haven't seen many positive examples of it. If I have a neighbor who is going around organizing some cooperation or activity to improve the safety of children in the neighborhood, I don't say - Thanks, Phil, you are such a good gadfly. In other words, I didn't know how to take it.

I told myself that here is another thing that he would have to explain if it was important enough for someone to ask him. I doubt that it is, but I get the impression he won't be making references to Paul Wellstone in his speeches.

In this world with all the legal and political, real and rampant crime and in our self assigned task to find out what our leaders are doing about it - we run out of time - so we take this and that and form opinions - associations. I've made an association for me.


I made an unfortunate association regarding Obama with that reporting.
I wish I had not read the thread. I would rather have not heard it.

But, I will hesitate bringing up something like this because some people don't seem to understand what Paul Wellstone meant to some people and not being sure what someone means when they are in public service is something that I can/should avoid when it's more important to hear what the person thinks about ending the 'war'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
87. I knew Paul Wellstone when he was a college professor
I first met him when he was the MN state chair of the Jackson '88 presidential campaign in 1987, and I was a college student.

I worked with him on a state legislative race in 1988, where he helped us replace a far-right do-nothing politician with a considerate, hard-working man who represented his district.

I was a Wellstone delegate to the MN DFL state convention in 1990, and was a precinct captain for him at the 1990 caucuses, as well.

Although I admittedly didn't know him well, I feel safe in saying that he would NOT approve of anybody using his name to attack ANY fellow Democrat, even those he may not agree with 100%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
89. this guy never ceases to amaze me. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. THIS annoys me:
"I frigging hate these Hillary Clinton workers here at DU"

Hillary supporters do exist, you know. And no we don't need to be paid. Do you really think only Obama and Edwards have passionate supporters?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
97. Supports a group that fights back against growing populist outrage within the Demo. party???
This article is not looking too good for Obama because he really presents himself as a progressive. Obama is truly a puzzle of contradictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. Not really......
He is exactly as he appears to be when channeling Reagan or bashing the Progressive wing of the party, by demanding Centrism, and by bashing long-time activists in the Party.....a LIEberman Repub-lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #98
106. You got that, right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
99. "Obama traveled to the state to endorse Lieberman."---well, this is new to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #99
105. It is true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
100. "a rare ability to mix charisma and deference to the establishment" --glitter, vagueness,
charm---yup, I give them that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MollieBradford Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
102. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
103. Obama praises Joe L: -

passed to me and I pass to you:

http://tinyurl.com/27tqea

HARTFORD, ......

Obama, an Illinois Democrat who is considered a rising star in the party, was the keynote speaker at the annual Jefferson Jackson Bailey Dinner. Lieberman, Connecticut’s junior senator, is under fire from some liberal Democrats for his support of the Iraq War. He was key in booking Obama, who routinely receives more than 200 speaking invitations each week.

Some at Thursday’s dinner said that while they were pleased with Lieberman’s success in bringing Obama to Connecticut, they still consider Lieberman uncomfortably tolerant of the Bush administration. Obama wasted little time getting to that point, calling it the “elephant in the room” but praising Lieberman’s intellect, character and qualifications.

“The fact of the matter is, I know some in the party have differences with Joe. I’m going to go ahead and say it,” Obama told the 1,700-plus party members who gathered in a ballroom at the Connecticut Convention Center for the $175-per-head fundraiser.

“I am absolutely certain Connecticut is going to have the good sense to send Joe Lieberman back to the U.S. Senate so he can continue to serve on our behalf,” he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
104. great. our top two are both DLC corporate tools. why aren't more backing less tooly Edwards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC