Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay, Repubs, Whatcha Got?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:12 PM
Original message
Okay, Repubs, Whatcha Got?
The GOP smear machine has, unfortunately, become part and parcel of the American electoral process. It’s something we’ve all come to expect; it gets revved-up early in the cycle, and gets honed to its propaganda-catapulting best as the field narrows.

However, this year’s mud-slinging machine is quickly running out of mud – mainly because the GOP are covered in it. It’s kind of hard to accuse the ‘other side’ of the very things your own party members have been entrenched in – and very publicly so. (Damn that librul media!)

Ties to corruption. Always a traditional crowd-pleaser, insinuating that a Democratic candidate has had his/her hand in the cookie-jar, or has associated with known criminals.
Can you say the words Ney, Noe, Cunningham, Foggo? How about A-B-R-A-M-O-F-F?

Sexual misconduct, that perennial favorite, will also have to be mothballed for a while – especially the kind that involves (gasp!) homosexuality, children, or fetishism. Calling Mr. Craig, Mr. Foley, Mr. Vitter; please pick up! Is Jeff Gannon in the House? Your president is waiting.

One word: Incompetence. One response: Katrina.

Democrats lie! Finally found those WMDs in Iraq, have you – along with the mobile chemical labs and the balsa-wood drones that can drop chemical weapons on its neighbors within fifteen minutes? Now’s the time to trot that news out – oh, if only it weren’t another well-worn lie.

Tax & Spend. My personal favorite. The party of fiscal responsibility has just run up the largest national debt in the country’s history. Now, do tell us again how much interest we’re paying on that debt, won’t ya, pretty please? Oh, and by the way, any word on the billions of taxpayers’ dollars that have simply gone missin’ on your watch?

Weak on National Security. Uh-oh, another once-reliable soundbyte goes out the window. According to those damnable surveys, the voters think otherwise. Admittedly, it took a few years to sink in: Yeah, yeah, there hasn’t been another 9-11 attack since – well, since 9-11. But if you people are so on-the-ball, why did 9-11 happen in the first place?

Lack of ‘family’ values. Oooh, it’s a shame to see this one go down so fast, and so hard. Chelsea Clinton and Cate Edwards – never arrested for under-age drinking, and no photos of drunken partying spread all over the internetz. And if only all of the Dem candidates were on their third rather than their first marriages, you guys could have a field day. Alas, it was not meant to be.

They want to institute a ‘nanny state’ type of governance. Oh, you betcha. The Democrats want horrible things like meat inspection, and keeping lead-laden toys out of American children’s hands. Granted, it’s not as intrusive as, say, wiretapping, but it does seem to strike a positive chord with people who would rather the government was inspecting their food instead of intercepting their emails to grandma.

Of course, the smear-machine includes a precision target-seeker mechanism, meant to zero-in on potential vulnerabilities of individuals, such as …

Hillary Clinton: A weak woman who stood by her man, even though she knew he was a philanderer. Calling Mrs. Craig, Mrs. Vitter – please pick up! Your wide-stance husband has been arrested, and his diaper needs changing! Divorce lawyers are on the line; please have your credit card handy!

Barack Obama: Admits to using marijuana and cocaine in the past. Pretty hard sell when your own party has supported a drunk coke-head for the past seven years – and judging from his slurred words and bruises from a series of unspecified mishaps, it would seem that el selected presidente's substance abuse is not exactly a part of his past.

John Edwards: A guy intent on ruining the country by going after Big Pharma, Big Oil, Big Business. Uh, don’t look now, but the average voter is on his side. There aren’t too many people out there who are rooting for the corporations that have outsourced their jobs, the drug companies that are pushing unsafe and/or ineffective but expensive pharmaceuticals – and the oil conglomerates? Hey, who doesn’t want to see that price-per-gallon skyrocket?

Let’s face it, guys, you got nuthin’. Thanks to BushCo and your unwavering support thereof, there isn’t a crime or personal peccadillo that’s been a headline over the past few years that didn’t have a GOPer’s name written all over it.

So the smear-machine is out of ammo – but don’t despair. You can always rely on the positive, like your party’s accomplishments: overturning Roe v Wade, a Constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, victory in Iraq – oh, sorry, I completely forgot you’ve never lived up to your campaign promises. Not to worry; I’m sure nobody noticed.

Maybe it’s better to stick with the tried-and-true stuff, like the booming economy, how you Support the Troops, what good Christians you all are – and just hope that no one has actually realized that the economy sucks, our vets are being shafted, and Jesus never would have condoned torture.

That being said, I want to wish all of you good luck in November! You guys are a shoe-in!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. whats the smear on kucinich?
honestly I really havn't heard freepers speak of this guy, I'm sure they have said some hillarious stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Kucinich?
Oh, he's just crazy! Wants things like government accountability, a transparent election system, a balanced budget!!! Thinks we should spend American taxpayers' money on Americans!

Obviously, the guy is just NUTZ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Don't forget the UFO's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. dupe
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 08:22 PM by fenriswolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Who's a dupe?
And what are they duped about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good observations. Now if we can just make it 10 more months
without some BS "incident" or false flag action. That alway riles up the dunderheads and makes them forget all of the stuff that has happened these last 7 disasterous years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I hear ya ...
... but I beg to differ.

If you've lost your job, your home, your savings, your health insurance, and/or a loved one in Iraq, you're not about to forget anything - especially who and what party led to it all.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Love this one:
"Lack of ‘family’ values. Oooh, it’s a shame to see this one go down so fast, and so hard. Chelsea Clinton and Cate Edwards – never arrested for under-age drinking, and no photos of drunken partying spread all over the internetz. And if only all of the Dem candidates were on their third rather than their first marriages, you guys could have a field day. Alas, it was not meant to be."

Another beauty, Nance, with EXCELLENT talking points to throw back at my Rightie friends.

Thanks.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Whatever is wrong with anything, in any way.
is still (B.) Clinton's fault. Any anything else that's discovered that can't be pinned on him will be laid at the feet of FDR.

Their shrinking pool of true believers still love this stuff. It's a rerun they can't get enough of, but most of the country can and has.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldtimeralso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Great One
I like the line "Let’s face it, guys, you got nuthin’." and would like to add and never really did. at least nuthin' true.
According to an NYT poll 75% of us think the country is on the wrong track. That is a big problem when the bu$h administration has only a one track mind, and it has been derailed in Iraq and Iran for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, pReznet Bush's views DIFFER ...
... from the views of the vast majority of the voters.

If only he'd had the foresight to hand out three thousand votes per millionaire along with their tax-cuts, the GOP would be in much better shape right now.

What a shame that the final voting comes down to EXTREMELY PISSED-OFF average citizens.

Hey, who knew? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleOfNah Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. They have the mainstream media, ill gotten gains, and no morals.
Animals are most dangerous when injured and cornered.

Assume nothing, play to win until well after the whistle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well done, Nancy
Very thorough. Bookmarked!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. On first reading everything I've got contracted and tensed in agreement and
the clarity of how the obvious is presented made me very happy. On second reading I'm very sad at the state of affairs and the myriad of pre-occupations and self serving agendas that don't allow anything resembling truth and justice to prevail in this country at this time.

Wonderful job of assembling truth and writing about the incongruities.
You are again my hero for your ability to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Three problems.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 03:09 PM by Jackpine Radical
First, they've never let "inconvenient" little truths get in the way of their Big Lie machine in the past.
Second, the press will let all their hypocrisies go unchallenged and never call them on any of these things.
Third, the Semantics Nazis have asked me to mention that it's "shoo-in" (like shooing a cow into the barn), not "shoe-in."
Edited to add: (I didn't want to do it, but they threatened me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. very astute nance.
i think they've taken the slime machine and started throwing crap in dem politicking. thanks for reminding us who our real opponent is (are).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. I have been hammering many of these points for ages to the R's
around here, and every time they have to face the truth, they go to "Clinton". Their entire universe is "Clinton-centric", the notion that R's could never fail was the centerpiece of their ideology. Now, the realization that R's have failed at everything under bush, they are at long last, turning the corner into reality.

Most businesses around here are faltering, as those they depend on to get paid from, are themselves facing some exceptionally hard times. the economy is rosy, if all you do play the stock market, but if you have to work for a living, I mean really work, there is the storm on the horizon that is coming on quickly.

Unless we do something incredibly stupid, we can count on D's in charge for a long time to come...let's all hope they can male the right decisions to get us back to a nation that is both proud and prospers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. My dear Nance!
You know, you're just going to have to stop writing so damn well, girl!

I am running out of accolades...:cry:

Beautifully done, beautifully written...

K&R of course...

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. Right on! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Guns.
.
Love you and your writings. Your's is the clear clean voice of the believer. Everything you have written in your DU journal makes me happy to think the people recognize the truth and will speak to power.

Now if only power were listening. If only it mattered.

Given everything you write in this journal entry is what the GOP has, what alternative do the junta members have? Facing a future of certain defeat at the polls and surrendering power to the 'law and order' people of the Democratic Party, is it not reasonable to expect the worst? The GOP may not have much.

The shrub administration has guns. Why does one think they will not use them against their enemies?

I truly want to believe we will make it through November 2008 and on to January 2009 without a coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. Don't look now, but
Plenty of Republicans really believe they ARE a shoo-in.

Either they have their heads stuck in the sand, or they know
something we don't, as in "we'll take care of the counting
(Rep. Peter King, R-NY on election day, 2004)." Footnote here:
indeed they did.

One would hope it's the former.

We would be naïve to think it could not be the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. The name Nance Greggs
has to be on some official watch list by now.
I have a friend who's running for Congress against an entrenched Repube in a heavily leaning Repube district. I keep sending him your astute observations in the hope he'll work them into his stump speech.
I'll take tax and spend over borrow and embezzle any day.
Nance Greggs kicks ass again. Bravo madam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
21. I hope the Dem candidates read and recycle these talking points at every opportunity
Lets use Rovian tactics against them for once (except it's not really Rovian because the talking points happen to be true).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hey, Nance, do you remember Cole Porter's "You're the Top"?
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 05:38 PM by MasonJar
That's you! You're the top! You're the Coliseum./ You're the top! You're the Lourve Museum./ You're the top! You're all of it. Go, girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TellTheTruth82 Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
23. WMDs
Gotta be a little careful....They did find a small number (<200) of degraded chemical weapons. So, technically, WMD were found. Everything else, OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC