Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Obama have won Iowa due to bullying other caucus goers into switching sides?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:25 PM
Original message
Could Obama have won Iowa due to bullying other caucus goers into switching sides?
I don't recall anyone bringing this up after he won Iowa.

For anyone who hasn't been to a caucus, you have to be very strong to not be run down by the bully mentality of other caucus goers.

New Hampshire is a primary where voters get to vote in private, where than can vote their heart.

Food for thought.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd believe that caucus is a more emotional voting environment
rock concert, football game, etc ----- which results in excessive emotions.

But I don't know what went on in the Iowa caucuses. We don't know if Obama had more vocal supporters or Edwards.
But I wouldnt' think it be a great environment for considered voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, as someone pointed out, you could vote for a second choice in Iowa
but not in NH, so he probably did get a fair number of second votes. But bullying? These are neighbors, not strangers in an alley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Bullying is the wrong concept: crowd psychology is closer to it
and we well know from psych studies that the majority of people in a crowd will do things they wouldn't otherwise do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was wondering why he was providing his supporters with "Obama '08" baseball bats.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. They might have bussed in illegal voters
and used Republican operatives. According to some posts around here, as I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Have you ever even BEEN to a caucus?
Please....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. VOTE OR DIE!
To answer your question: no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debatepro Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Contrary trend reports
There are reports that Obama supports went over to edwards in order to get him more "delegates". I am trying to find the two reports I read now but in one case edwards wasn't even viable and obama had a ton of extra support that they leaked over to make him viable. I will look for the reports...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. yes, and he used thugs from Diebold to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah sure,
I heard he infiltrated each caucus with Chicago gang-bangers. With all due respect I think this is a stupid post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. gang bangers? My post isn't any more stupid than the countless other threads around here.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 12:40 PM by goldcanyonaz
It's something that I have been wondering and others have mentioned it as well. So I asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Obama won on the first alignment, so no
As for bullying in a caucus during the realignment, it's how the caucuses work, though it could better be called convincing than bullying. It's Iowan politics and maybe your heart has to be stronger to stand out in the open in front of God and all and still stand strong for your candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debatepro Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama supporters helped Edwards to undermine Clinton in caucuses
This is from a comment that I thought was telling:
On Second Choices
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/4/151447/3389
underwhelm on Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 01:14:27 PM PST

It is more complicated than that.

I'll give you an example. At my precinct's first count, we had (roughly) Obama: 155, Clinton: 54, Edwards: 32, Other + Uncommitted: 51.

After the second count, it was Obama: 153, Clinton 66, Edwards: 60.

However, all 12 of the Richardson supporters moved en masse to Obama during realignment. He clearly was their second choice, yet he wound up with fewer supporters because some people who supported him in the first instance moved to support Edwards to give him a delegate.

All that is a very round about way of saying that Obama may have gotten a great deal of second-choice support... but some people who supported him as a first choice voluntarily exercised the option of making a second choice knowing the size of Obama's victory.

In fact, in an instant-runoff voting system, Obama's victory would have been larger than it was. People would not have been able to see the outcome of the first round of voting and adjust their strategy accordingly.

Clear as mud?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kucinich and Richardson told caucies to vote for Obama - this was the difference
Unless the voting machines are rigged. What do they vote on in NH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. 57% of his support in Iowa came from those under 30.
That is a large percentage of your support in one basket. If you can't get them to show up in big numbers, there will be trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. I didn't see any bullying in my precinct, and if there had been it would have been ineffective.
The Richardson/Dodd/Biden/Kucinich supporters stayed with their candidate and held out until the very end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. No, he won the first ballot.
But your racism is duly noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. I said the same thing to Haruka on the phone a few minutes ago
As Is aid in a thread earlier, machines aren't the only way to rig an election.*

*I don't believe the caucus was rigged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. No one attempted to persuade, let alone bully anyone into
switching their positions from ANY of the candidate "camps" in my own caucus precinct. Mine included over 500 participants, so the "strength in numbers" was there if anyone was so inclined...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC