Obama lost to Clinton so Edwards should drop out (snark)

[jsamuel]

:eyes:

[jackson_dem]

1. Edwards picked up four delegates tonight, Obama nine

So Edwards should quit! Obama is only 2,000 delegates away from the promised land!

[Andy823]

2. Yep

Great logic. Guess some people afraid that Edwards will come out the "real" winner!

[jgraz]

3. Edwards is still running?

Cuz I sure couldn't tell from watching the teevee tonight. :banghead:

[Bishop Rook]

5. That was annoying.

I was watching MSNBC's coverage, very early in the returns, and they showed a graphic of Clinton 38%, Obama 36% ... then nothing.

So Edwards got... what, 26%? Or close to that? They didn't think that was worth of any screen real estate?

[silverojo]

9. CNN mentioned Edwards before HRC/Obama

That's because he was predicted to be #3 in NH, long before the Clinton/Obama horserace was won.

[AshevilleGuy]

4. And since Romney lost to McCain, Huckabee should drop out

Actually I wish he would - he is scary!

[frazzled]

6. At some point, he has to consider his reputation.

You can't keep losing by 20 points or more and continue on without losing your reputation. And I think he will lose by at least that in South Carolina.

[jsamuel]

7. Clinton went through all the early states and only won Georgia on super Tuesday and went on to win

the nomination.

[caligirl]

8. obama leads with delegates, hil follows and Edwards isn't to far back

actually he is close. As he continues to pick up delegates he has more influence in a brokered convention to push the other two for his issues. I was worried about Hil winning because 'change' voters were split Obama/Edwards. But I decided to stay with Edwards. This is about delegates and change. Getting Edwards issues into the party platform requires delegates I think? In a close race the politicians in our party aren't as likely to ignore the voters will as Bush does daily.