Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Remember Gore's lockbox (he's been proven right once again)?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 05:12 AM
Original message
Remember Gore's lockbox (he's been proven right once again)?
Wasn't such a bad idea after all eh? God, this guy has the shittiest luck imaginable. First he wins the election and has it stolen. Next, he bets on the wrong horse in the primaries.

Either way he's been proven correct over and over again. So much about Bush=Gore....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal Democratic discussion forum
   Replies to this thread
  - well put  Fitzovich   Feb-26-04 05:41 AM   #1 
  - Exactly  quaker bill   Feb-26-04 06:16 AM   #2 
  - Really?  molly   Feb-26-04 07:13 AM   #4 
  - Just for added emphasis  quaker bill   Feb-26-04 07:06 AM   #3 
  - Well_not exactly  Donna Zen   Feb-26-04 07:23 AM   #5 
Fitzovich Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. well put
I think you have said it all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Exactly
Edited on Thu Feb-26-04 06:17 AM by quaker bill
But actually he backed the right horse in the primaries. A guy who understood the true and impending costs of tax-cut and spend government and tried to put a stop to it.

But, but, but "middle class tax cuts are popular". Well social security benefits are popular as well. You can have one or the other, but you can't both. The numbers just don't work.

Sorry, but Dean was also right on this one. Thus the endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Really?

This article, very well researched, and footnoted! talks about Howard Dean pre-presidential run. It addresses his stances on many items of interest to this community throughout his years as governor of Vermont.


Though he has been dubbed a "raging liberal" by admirers and critics alike, Howard Dean governed Vermont strictly within the framework of the conservative Democratic Leadership Council.

Many people on the Vermont left see Deans current posture as politically motivated. "The notion that he is a liberal is ludicrous to those of us who worked with him in Vermont," said Terrill Bouricius, a former state representative.4 Dean admits that he recognized early on that the popular anger at Bush is "a raw energy, an energy that I know could be channeled."5


But such political maneuvering is nothing new for Dean. Upon becoming governor of Vermont in 1991, after the sudden death of then-Republican Governor Richard Snelling, Dean made a sharp turn to the right and pursued that course ever since. In his 11 years as governor, Dean would shift rightward on one position after another, all the while claiming to be concerned for the needy and less-fortunate, and disappointing all who thought they were getting someone who would govern from the liberal end of the political spectrum.

Dean inherited a massive deficit in the state budget from Snelling. Refusing to raise taxes on wealthier Vermonters (and rendering the tax system more regressive than previously), Dean declared in his first State of the State address that it would be his mission to balance the state budget with some "tough" cuts. Even though Vermont has no law requiring a balanced budget, Dean promised, "The pain for Vermonters will be real."7

Dean slashed millions of dollars from all sorts of social programs, from prescription drug benefits for Medicare recipients and heating assistance for poorer Vermonters to housing assistance funds. In defending his cuts to social programs, Dean said, "I dont think I have to shy away from that just because Im supposed to be a liberal Democrat."8

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just for added emphasis
The facts about Social Security have not changed over the last 8 weeks. The only thing changing here is our understanding of the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well_not exactly
Edited on Thu Feb-26-04 07:27 AM by Donna Zen
This country runs on a unified budget, and has for some time.

IOW, there is no locked box. For more information read "The Two Percent Solution" by Matthew Miller, a book which points out the many ways we are being lied to by both parties who use this issue for political gain. Also, the situation is far worse than we are being told. The truth is that we are reaching the point that the amt. being paid in will equal the amt being paid out; after that it is all down hill until it finally results in ALL discretionary spending being consumed by med. care and soc. sec.

At that time, those paying into the system will be faced with chosing between roads, schools, etc., or telling the elderly to suck it up and go starve in the streets.

People do not get elected by telling the truth....whose problem is that? I think it is as much the "ignorant" voters problem as it is the smarmy politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Aug 29th 2015, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC