|
I never wanted to be in this role. I never wanted to feel like I needed to come to the defense of candidates who I do not support and do not want to see get the nomination. But I feel that when things sink too low I need to stand up and say something to come to the defense of people who I never thought I would be defending.
I must say that some of the comments I have seen about Hillary's emotional speech have really bothered me. Yes, Hillary got emotional. There is nothing wrong with that, I am sure everyone reading this gets emotional from time to time. And if you were spending the last several years of your life dreaming about being President and then seeing that dream collapse before your eyes I am sure you would be very emotional about it as well. I have no doubt that those emotions are real, there was nothing phony about them.
We have very real issues that need to be discussed. If you want to go after Hillary go after her on her vote for the Iraq war, go after her on her close relationship with the pharmaceutical companies, go after her on her ties to Mark Penn, go after her on the issues, but don't try and pretend she is not a human being with real emotions.
I don't want Hillary to be our next President, but I would one day love to see a different woman as President of the United States and all of this focus on one candidate's emotions is not helping to make that dream a reality. This is the type of attack that whether it is meant in a sexist manner or not sets back women's opportunities to reach these types of goals.
It doesn't matter whether Hillary cries or not, it matters what her policy positions are. If this is the type of issue we are focused on then we really need to get our priorities in order.
Can we please go back to talking about the war and the influence that lobbyists have in Washington?
|