Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby-New Hampshire -Clinton 32% Obama 26% Edwards 20%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:05 AM
Original message
Zogby-New Hampshire -Clinton 32% Obama 26% Edwards 20%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Two words: Iowa bump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't do this. You'll upset the Obamites, and they'll start badmouthing everyone again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I Will Post And Be Respectful
Until and unless people are disrespectful to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Sounds like sour grapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. See what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. That's politics.
Deal with it.

38-30-29.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. I'm fine. I assume it's OK to criticize.
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 02:19 PM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Like you are badmouthing them in your post....I see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. what happens if Hillary comes in 3rd in NH ?
i heard some talk that her people believe she could still continue the campaign if she comes in 2nd in NH.

but what if she comes in 3rd ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. She Will Stay In The Campaign Through February 5th
Candidates end their campaign when they run out of money...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. I suspect that Obama will get that 10 point Iowa bump
beyond that it's hard to know how much support Clinton loses. And this schedule is not friendly to her. She only has 4 days to make up lost ground. I don't see her winning it at this point, but I do think she'll take second. How does that set things up for SC? Will African Americans defect to Obama in large numbers? I think that's a reasonable assumption. It's beginning to look to me like Clinton will have to wait for NV for a win. Then she and Obama will battle it out on Super Tuesday. If Edwards drops out and endorses Obama after SC, it's hard to see Clinton getting the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I agree with your assessment.
In addition to Obama surging, Hillary may lose a few points due to her third place finish. In any case, I think now Obama has the advantage in NH and SC. It could really gain more and more momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. I agree with your analyses on NH
The Clintons are hurt by the very front loading they created. From the polling Obama was even or slightly behind HRC in NH, but anyone with HRC, because "only she can win" may rethink things. If Obama gets the 10 point Iowa bump, he's ahead. There seems no reason that Edwards would get any bump, so HRC will be second.

I do think that Obama could win Iowa and NH and even SC and have something swing things back to HRC. It would be Obama's to lose though. The coming debate will be just Obama, HRC, Edwards and Richardson. Even in the last debate, Obama was the most at ease. If Obama can repeat that, he will likely win. At any rate, his job will be to stay calm and respond reasonably to the attacks that are likely to come. Fortunately, that seems consistent with his personality.

The problem HRC has is that she has not been able to make the experience issue stick, partially as her own experience has been questioned. As she is perceived more negative than Obama, it is impossible for her to be the "grown up", above the fray candidate, she likely intended to be. The Clintons likely have a really tough decision - they already tried going very negative - and it clearly backfired. There is no reason to thing it would work this time and it potentially hurts the Democratic nominee. About the only way I can see attacks on Obama helping HRC is if they come from Richardson or Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Excellent analysis,karynnj.
May I add that the polls in Iowa very quite misleading?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Was this poll taken BEFORE the Iowa caucas or after
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. had to have been before
unless they did flash overnight polling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I was polled by Zogby before the caucus...in the afternoon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. It was before the caucuses began.
It says so on the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Don't believe the polls in New Hampshire...
we lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Wicked...LOL.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. LOL!
Too funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. This was taken before the Iowa caucuses...to use as a baseline
To gauge the effect of Iowa...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. Zogby holds the title(so far) of being the most erratic of the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Yep ...
He was on C-Span last weekend and he had Clinton with a three or four point lead, and seemed to think that Edwards had the most to gain with the second tier votes, and by not saying much about him seemed to indicate that Hill was who he would put his money on ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
22. watch tomorrow for the first uptick of an Obama bump from Iowa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC