Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush directly attacked Kerry today: called him a waffler

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:01 PM
Original message
Bush directly attacked Kerry today: called him a waffler
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 11:12 PM by andym
WASHINGTON - President Bush took the offensive on his re-election campaign Monday, casting Sen. John Kerry as a waffler and warning that the Democrats would raise taxes, expand the government and fail to lead decisively on national security.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040224/ap_on_el_pr/bush_campaign&cid=694&ncid=716

I believe this signals the beginning of the general election, even though we're still in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's going to be the main attack against Kerry
Expect to hear it over and over as well as flip-flopper and wishy-washy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. From ex-Deanies? Or Bushit?
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 11:07 PM by JHBowden
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. From Bush.
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 11:14 PM by janx
Deaniacs said this because they could see it coming. We could also see Nader coming.

Bush is going to hammer Kerry about these things relentlessly. He has already started to do so. Tonight was not the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
32. Sadly, Bush is an idiot and his hammer is made of glass
Who is going to fall for his "they want to raise your taxes" for example as soon as the dems say "Yeah, on the rich!"

Waffler is just dumb - Kerry can and will defend his record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Which would you prefer?
Since loyalty is not your strong suit I thought I'd ask. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. We're all fucked if GW gets another term in office.
If you think the first term was bad, wait until this bozo thinks he has a mandate, and picks up more Senators in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BL_Zebub Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. The reason Junior will pick up more Senators
Is because there are two right now who will be replaced by Repuke governors. And those two are your DLC golden boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Lieberman was the first to refer to Kerry as a waffler
The difference is that Lieberman had credibility, while Bush has none.

Kerry's record is his own worst enemy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. Kerry Can and Will Defend his record
when he talks about his record, he makes sense.

When GWB talks is doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. Hope they have fun with it,
'coz it ain't gonna work. So Kerry is a waffler...Bush* FAILED to protect America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
38. Bush and his cronies are the most corrupt, inept bunch to ever occupy WH.
They cannot defend their own sorry record, so they seek to attack John Kerry's record. It's not going to work for these corrupt, incompetents.

The Patriot Act has many detractors--many of them conservatives. John Ashcroft has abused his authority under the Patriot Act; we are not surprised.

No Child Left Behind is reviled by those on the left and right--another unfunded mandate from the federal government which dictates education policy to the states-- many who are rebeling, including Republican controlled legislatures.

Rushing to an unnecessary, unilateral war it NOT a sign of strength and decisiveness-it is a sign of recklessness. Our Army is severely overextended, our soldiers are dying every day, while others are maimed for life. Our treasury has been looted-- and for what end? We are virtually alone in bearing the burden in Iraq, which may well be headed toward civil war. Bushco still refuses to share the spoils and internationalize the efforts in Iraq. Remember they were divvying up the Iraqi oil contracts the first few months of this administration, according to Paul O'Neill.

Voting for every weapons system, no matter how unworkable and overpriced, that comes down the pike does not make one patriotic--this is absurd. Rummy cancelled the Commanche helicopter yesterday--has any one impugned his patriotism?

Our treasury has also been looted to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy, while Bush lies about how rolling back the tax cuts will hurt small business--only 4% of small business, including farmers, make over $200,000--while Cheney and Bush are actually considered to be "small businessmen". Smell a rat, anyone?

Any more questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry should have hit back hard
TODAY during the same news cycle and called Bush on that BS. And then lobbed one back into their camp.

Did he?

Because that is what it's going to take. Rapid response and then a lob back about Bush's record.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not directly, yet ....
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 11:10 PM by andym
He said this about Bush earlier:

"I don't think losing 3 million jobs, having deficits as far as the eye can go, having 2 million people lose their health insurance, turning your back on kids in schools and not funding No Child Left Behind ... represents a vision."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. That's not good enough.
But we'll leave it to the Kerry campaign to figure this out until he gets the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowsdower Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Kerry can't hit back
because the waffling accusations are true. Kerry is too weak on the issues, and is going to get clobbered for his flip-flops. Why couldn't these people open their eyes and realize Kerry cannot win in November?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #22
37. Kerry could say he does agree and doesn't agree with Bush's comments.
????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King of New Orleans Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I demand Kerry respond by
calling Bush a "lollygagger" or a "gadabout"

or Kerry could just say what he said in post #5.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. We need to coin a term for Bush. Fascist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SerpentX Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. The Lyin' King
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. LMAO
I like that :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
34. Excellent!
Did you make that up? Very clever! It's my new name for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
39. good one n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
40. HAH! Good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush = king waffle cone!
no nation building
will not touch the social security "lock box"
fiscal conservative
... and king wopper : "Bringing honesty and integrity to the White House"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. True, Bush is the biggest waffler!
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 11:21 PM by andym
I still am annoyed how Gore didn't make him look foolish during the second debate when Bush talked about "no nation building".

And look how Bush has contradicted himself once his friends realized how lucrative nation building could be.


I think "The Daily Show" had a good debate between Gov. Bush and Pres. Bush a while back. It was hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
35. I don't think
"I know you are but what am I" is going to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm totally guessing here
But it seems to me that you stick something on a candidate not with one single story, but with 3 or 4 over several months. You sort of build a weight of evidence, and these stories can back refer to each other.

And you start modest in your goals and sort of build up the detail.

It is a guess but the recent Drudge 'Kerry Philander' story possibly wasn't the first story in that series. It could have been the postitive story about Kerry having dated film actresses like Morgan Fairchild, but which plants the seed that Kerry has a high sex drive who likes to get around a bit, which then makes the second story more palatable for the general population.

I guess that this is just pure marketing technique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Painting is an evil art
Your analysis sounds about right. The first stories should be innocuous but set the stage for the later harmful stories.

IMHO, both Edwards and Kerry have a very narrow window to innoculate themselves against this by appearing regularly on popular network TV shows and establishing a strong postive persona in the popular culture. Without that it will be easy to paint either of them. Ask Dean or Clark how easy it is to get painted as something you are not, when you are not yet well known in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. unfortunately Kerry HAS waffled
'yeah but' is not much of a retort.

Don't have this problem with Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowsdower Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. EXACTLY
There is still time for people to wake up and get behind Edwards, but I fear that some are just too blind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Bush is the flip flopper in chief
I think that the Kerry campaign's response to Bush's theme that Kerry flip flops on key issues is too defensive. The Kerry campaign should point out that Bush is really the "Flip Flopper in Chief." Bush has flip flopped on important issues numerous times. For example,

1. When he ran for Congress in 1978, Bush said that he "favors leaving up to a woman and her doctor the abortion question." (i.e., he was pro-choice). Now, he is completely anti-choice.

2. In September 2000, Bush promised that if elected he would push for regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. In March 2001, he abandoned that promise, and Cheney claimed it "was a mistake."

3. In the final days before the 2000 election, Cheney flew to Nevada and stated that a Bush administration would take no precipitous action on locating a nuclear waste site at Yucca Mountain. In February 2002, Bush announced his support of moving ahead with the storage of nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain (which does in fact present serious safety risks).

4. In March 2001, Bush stated that "we can proceed with tax relief without fear of budget deficits, even if the economy softens." In the spring of 2002, Bush said that deficits would be "small and temporary." In the 2002 campaign season, he said that "for the sake of fiscal sanity, the United States Senate must . . . get us to head toward a balanced budget." Now, of course, Bush has abandoned these ideas, and the US budget deficit is over $500 billion.

5. In 2000, Bush stated that he was against the concept of nation building. In 2004, however, Bush's Iraq quagmire is the largest example of nation building in which a president has engaged for decades.

6. In his 2003 State of the Union address, Bush claimed that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa. Now, Bush's administation admits that claim was wrong.

I dug up these Bush flip flops off the internet. I bet that many more could be found off the internet or Lexis/Nexis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Good idea
They should just use the debate from the Daily Show in which Governor Bush and President Bush go at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Possibly
There are like 3 or 4 characteristic that define people, their morality, their ability, another, and another.

The philander story could be the morality one, the waffler story could be the ability one, and if you know what the other one or two characteristics are you may be able to guess what the other stories are going to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Maybe the mistake was
with the bush* early business career stuff was failing to grow the story properly. We tried to spring the story fully formed in all it's details, onto a fairly disinterested market.

Perhaps the first stage was a fairly hagiography description of how bush* had built up his fortune, but leaving a few enticing loose ends which you then proceed to elaborate on later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. The mistake was a very clean campaign from Gore and friends
Edited on Tue Feb-24-04 12:19 AM by andym
While Gore was being painted as Pinnochio, Gore's team did not try to paint Bush as anything. That's why Bush is considered "honest" today by many Americans. And once you have a reputation, it's difficult to change it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bush Doesn't Waffle - He's Wrong All of The Time
Unfortunately, most Americans share Kerry's position on Iraq (right thing done very wrong) and Kerry is not going to raise taxes on the middle class (part of why he is electable).

As for expanding the government, actually the government HAS expanded under Bush - he just doesn't bother balancing the budget to pay for it (how 'bout another tax cut, Chief?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. Even worse
he called him a "Senator from Massachusetts"

Ham sandwich 04. Its important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. I think its time for Kerry to break out "Play Texan" then
This is war! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
29. Dems should call Bush the waffler in chief
I think that the Kerry campaign's response to Bush's theme that Kerry flip flops on key issues is far too defensive. The Kerry campaign should point out that Bush is really the "Flip Flopper in Chief." Bush has flip flopped on important issues numerous times. For example,

1. When he ran for Congress in 1978, Bush said that he "favors leaving up to a woman and her doctor the abortion question." (i.e., he was pro-choice). Now, he is completely anti-choice.

2. In September 2000, Bush promised that if elected he would push for regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. In March 2001, he abandoned that promise, and Cheney claimed it "was a mistake."

3. In the final days before the 2000 election, Cheney flew to Nevada and stated that a Bush administration would take no precipitous action on locating a nuclear waste site at Yucca Mountain. In February 2002, Bush announced his support of moving ahead with the storage of nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain (which does in fact present serious safety risks).

4. In March 2001, Bush stated that "we can proceed with tax relief without fear of budget deficits, even if the economy softens." In the spring of 2002, Bush said that deficits would be "small and temporary." In the 2002 campaign season, he said that "for the sake of fiscal sanity, the United States Senate must . . . get us to head toward a balanced budget." Now, of course, Bush has abandoned these ideas, and the US budget deficit is over $500 billion.

5. In 2000, Bush stated that he was against the concept of nation building. In 2004, however, Bush's Iraq quagmire is the largest example of nation building in which a president has engaged for decades.

6. In his 2003 State of the Union address, Bush claimed that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa. Now, Bush's administation admits that claim was wrong.

I dug up these Bush flip flops off the internet. I bet that many more could be found off the internet or Lexis/Nexis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. Now if Kerry could just stop waffling...
It would go along way to keep Bush-hole in error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Better a waffler than a ridgid hard head who refuses to change even if
proven wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
36. Y'all are gettin too bent out of shape
This is the same tired old predictable drivel Republicans always trot out when they have nothing else. I think people are looking for something new, and certainly Chimpy does not have the imagination to provide that. If this is all they can come up with, people are gonna be inclined to tune out.

I think Kerry is more than ready to respond to this type of stuff...as long as the counterattacks are quick and on point(which is sometimes hard for Kerry to do), Bush's attacks are not going to be effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
42. Don't you realize
Edited on Tue Feb-24-04 12:37 PM by AngryAmish
that Bush is Hitler?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BL_Zebub Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. As much as I despise Junior, this line is true
"The other party's nomination battle is still playing out. The candidates are an interesting group with diverse opinions," Bush said. "They're for tax cuts and against them. They're for NAFTA and against NAFTA. They're for the Patriot Act and against the Patriot Act. They're in favor of liberating Iraq, and opposed to it. And that's just one senator from Massachusetts."

And this is exactly why John Kerry will fail as the nominee. Junior's already rehearsing his debates against Kerry, and this line is proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC