Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama on 'Face the Nation'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 02:57 PM
Original message
Obama on 'Face the Nation'
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 03:46 PM by Pirate Smile

Obama on 'Face the Nation'
by John McCormick

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama appeared on "Face the Nation" this morning on CBS. The transcript is below:

CBS, "Face the Nation," interviewed by Bob Schieffer, 12/23/2007

Bob Schieffer: And good morning again. Joining us from Des Moines this morning, Senator Barack Obama. And Senator thank you so much coming in this morning. And you are in a very good place this morning it seems like you are leading out there in Iowa. According to an average of the polls its getting very, very close in New Hampshire and it turns out you are now leading in South Carolina. I want to begin this morning by asking you about something you said this morning in the Des Moines Register, you argued to two of their reporters that you are the most electable of the Democrats. And you said that one reason for that you point to what you said you would not automatically have the Republicans rallied against you in the way in the way you argue that Senator Clinton would have them rallied against her. I mean, what are you saying here Senator that she just brings out the worst of the Republicans and you don't, I mean, how can you say that?


Senator Barack Obama: First of all, that was based on polls that we have seen, Bob, over the last several weeks that show me beating ever single Republican and showing that I am the only Democrat that does. And the difference, I think, is that I draw more Republicans and independents. And I actually think that Senator Clinton is a capable, solid Senator from New York. But because of the history of some of the battles that have taken place back in the 90s, it is true that she tends to galvanize the other side. But I was making more of a positive argument than a negative argument. What I've seen as I travel around Iowa and the across the country that people want to see the next president bring people together, push back the influence of special interests and lobbyists, talk straight with the American people and get things done. And how we've been running our campaign, I think, is the same way we want to govern. I may have disagreements with Republicans but I don't want to polarize and demonize those folks. I want to see if we can bring them into a working majority to actually deliver on healthcare, education, and new energy policy and a foreign policy that can repair some of the damage that has been done. So, the message was really one of what I can bring to the table as opposed to what others can't.

Bob Schieffer: Well in fact do you think that it would be a meaner and nastier campaign were she was the nominee instead of you?

Senator Barack Obama: Well, my suspicion is that the Republican National Committee is going be targeting any Democratic nominee. I am sure that there will be a lot of negative ads out there. They don't have much to run on based on what happened over the last seven to eight years. So, there is no doubt that there will be negativity, but I do think that if you start off with high negatives then you are playing on a very short field; and it's hard for you then to persuade those who might be persuadable to come into your corner. One of the things that I am seeing is that its not just Democrats, but it is also Republicans and independents who have also lost trust in how our government has functioned. They're concerned about profligate spending on things that aren't our priorities. They are concerned about the fact that we have a foreign policy that has diminished our standing around the world. They are concerned about inefficiencies. Katrina didn't just upset Democrats—it upset Republicans as well. And so we have a chance, potentially, to bring in people who have seen the philosophy of George Bush and Dick Cheney not serve the country well and are I think are willing to consider a new approach.

Bob Schieffer: Let me talk to you about the center piece of your campaign, you say it is change. Well now you've been in Washington and you have had a good record as a freshman Senator from Illinois. You're party has been in the majority, you have been on one of the key committees. What could you say at this point that since you have been dealing with national matters that you have change significantly? Have you changed anything yet or is that still to come?

Senator Barack Obama: Well actually, I think I have brought about change over the last two and half years. I passed along with Russ Feingold – the toughest ethics reform since Washington. We eliminated meals and gifts and the use of corporate jets from lobbyists to Congressman. We mandated the disclosure of bundling by lobbyists, who they are taking money from and who they are giving it to. I worked with Republicans across the aisle to set up a Google for government where that every dollar of federal spending is going to be on a virtual database, so that you as a journalist, but also ordinary citizens can find out how we are spending our money. And if there's a bridge being built to nowhere, or if there's a no-bid contract going to somebody, that will be transparent, and we will be able to hold our government accountable. On nuclear proliferation issues and arms control, I've worked with people like Dick Lugar to get things done. On Veterans Affairs, you know, in Walter Reed we had young men and women who were having to pay for their own meals after having been injured in service to our country; we eliminated that. So, obviously, there's a record there that I'm very proud of, but, when I talk about change, it's not simply policies; it's also a change in leadership. And what, right now, the American people are desperate for is a president that they can trust, who's going to promote accountability and transparency in our government, who's going to take a new approach on thing s like foreign policy—talking not just to our friends, but also to our enemies—and that's the kind of leadership I'm providing, and that's why we're doing so well in Iowa, and New Hampshire, and South Carolina; and, I think, ultimately, across the country.

Bob Schieffer: Well, Senator Clinton's husband says, not withstanding all of that, I'm sure he wouldn't concede that you've accomplished as much as you've just outlined there. He says that anybody who votes for you is taking a roll of the dice. What do you think about that, and are you surprised to find yourself running against Bill Clinton as well as Hillary Clinton?

Senator Barack Obama: Well, look, I don't begrudge Bill Clinton helping his wife. You know, my wife's helping me, and I understand that, you know, he's loyal to her and wants to make sure that he puts the best face forward on her campaign.

Bob Schieffer: Well, what about his criticism?

Senator Barack Obama: Well, what I would note would be that much of the criticism he's leveling at me is identical to the criticism that was leveled against him when he was running against George H.W. Bush. Folks said that here's a governor of a small state, has no foreign policy experience whatsoever, and his argument was "Look, my experience is rooted in the real lives of real people, and will bring real results if we have the courage to change."

Bob Schieffer: Do you think he's helping her campaign or hurting?

Senator Barack Obama: Well, I--there's no doubt that he's an asset to her campaign. Look, there's enormous fondness for Bill Clinton among Democrats, and I think that he brings the sort of megawatt celebrity that is almost unequalled anywhere in the country. When he shows up, there are big crowds. But, what people, I think, recognize, despite the fondness of him and of her--I think people feel that they respect her very much but, what people here in Iowa consistently tell me is they're looking for something different; they're looking for something new. They want to turn the page, and they want to deliver the sort of concrete goals of healthcare, an improved education system ,a new energy policy, and the reason I think we're doing well is that we represent a set of new ideas and a new attitude in terms of inviting the American people into participating in their government.

Bob Schieffer: Let me ask you about the war. You were on e of the first to say "we shouldn't go to Iraq." You say you've always been against it; you were against the surge. But, when you look at what's happening—what is happening, over there, Senator Obama, there is no question violence is down, This month , compared to November of a year ago, there were six hundred and fifty civilian deaths, a year go there were thirty-four hundred plus. Iraqi security forces, they're building up. Daily attacks are down form a hundred and eighty last November to just eighty this year. What do you think would be the situation right now, Senator, if the president had taken your advice?

Senator Barack Obama: Well, if he had taken my advice we would have never been in Iraq, and we would've saved ourselves—

Bob Schieffer: Lets' just talk about this, this recent surge of troops; the recent surge.

Senator Barack Obama: Well, keep in mind what I said at the time when the surge was being proposed: that I had no doubt that additional U.S. troops would make some difference on the ground—we've got the best troops in the world. But, George Bush's own premise was that as a consequence of the surge, we would give breathing room to the Iraqi's to start negotiating, and to stabilize the political situation there, and that was what I was skeptical of, and continue to be skeptical of. I'm glad that the violence has gone down, but keep in mind, Bob, that we've essentially gone full circle. We had intolerable levels of violence, and a dysfunctional government back in 2006. We saw a huge spike in violence to horrific levels. The surge comes in, and now we're back to where we were in 2006 with intolerable levels of violence and a dysfunctional Iraqi government. If we want to stabilize the situation in Iraq over the long term, then we have to trigger different behavior among the Shia, Kurdish factions, and get them to come to an agreement on how they're going to govern, and that has not happened. The only way, I believe, to trigger that different attitude is going to be if we announce a phased, careful, responsible, redeployment, and that's what I've proposed consistently.

Bob Schieffer: Alright. Well, Senator, we want to wish you the best out there, and I'm sure we'll being seeing you before those Iowa caucuses. We'll be back with Republican—

Senator Barack Obama: Bob, Merry Christmas.

Bob Schieffer: —presidential candidate Mike Huckabee in just one minute. Thank you, Senator.

Senator Barack Obama: Merry Christmas.

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/obama_on_face_the_nation.html#more



Here is the video:

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3643231n&channel=/sections/ftn/videoplayer3460.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didnt see the original airing, but I read this before and it seems like he nailed it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I agree. It was an easy read also. Sometimes interviews don't translate well but this one did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. What's this shit where he says he's the only one who beats the Republicans
in the polls? From what I've seen Edwards beats them in higher numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Depends on the poll you look at. I believe there are some zogby numbers that back it up
While Edwards has other numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well that's crap. Then he can't say that in honesty if there are differing numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh c'mon, you know they all do. They pick and choose which polls are good for them
In fact, Ive heard Edwards reference to the other polls that show only he can win. And how bout the Edwards campaign putting out their internal polling a couple weeks back that showed him up in Iowa, when every other poll showed him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I haven't seen the polls that have Obama beating Republicans
Which are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh, sorry, I see up there you said Zogby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. MSNBC AND FOX:::
USING SOME POLL WHERE AGAINST GUILLIANI AND ROMNEY (I THINK) HIS NUMBERS ARE HIGHER THE HILLARY OR JE...:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The google eyes say it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. here you go, from Zogby
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 03:17 PM by hnmnf
http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/12/zogby-obama-is.html


Zogby: Obama is only Dem leading all 5 Republicans
Sen. Barack Obama is the only Democratic presidential candidate who polled higher than all five of the top Republican contenders in its latest national telephone survey of potential "general election matchups," Zogby International reports this morning.

Democrat John Edwards polled higher than three of the Republicans. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton edged out two, though all but one of her matchups produced results signalling nearly dead-even races.

Zogby's results, based on a survey of 1,000 "likely" voters that it says produced a margin of error of +/- 3.2 percentage points on each figure:

Obama led:

• Rudy Giuliani, 48%-39%.
• Mike Huckabee, 47%-42%.
• Sen. John McCain, 47%-43%.
• Mitt Romney, 53%-35%.
• Fred Thompson, 52%-36%.

(So, Obama's leads over Giuliani, Romney and McCain are outside the margin of error -- but not his leads over Huckabee and McCain. Remember, each figure's margin is +/- 3.2 points. So the spread between the results needs to be at least 6.5 points to be outside the margin.)

Edwards:

• Led Huckabee, 47%-41%.
• Led Romney, 50%-38%.
• Led Thompson, 51%-35%.
• Trailed Giuliani, 45%-44%.
• Trailed McCain, 46%-42%.

(So, Edwards' leads over Romney and Thompson are outside the margin of error -- but not his lead over Huckabee. And he trails Giuliani and McCain by less than the margin of error.)

Clinton:

• Led Romney, 46%-44%.
• Led Thompson, 48%-42%.
• Trailed Giuliani, 46%-42%.
• Trailed Huckabee, 48%-43%.
• Trailed McCain, 49%-42%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Here:
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/poll_obama_more_e...

Poll: Obama More Electable Than Hillary AND Edwards
By Eric Kleefeld - December 21, 2007, 12:45PM

A new Zogby poll shows that Barack Obama is the most electable of the top three Democratic candidates, followed by John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.

Of the three Dems, Obama is the only one to beat five Republicans in all match-ups. Hillary loses to Mike Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain, while Edwards can beat Huckabee but loses to Giuliani and McCain.

The full numbers are available after the jump.

Obama (D) 53%, Romney (R) 35%
Obama (D) 47%, Huckabee (R) 42%
Obama (D) 48%, Giuliani (R) 39%
Obama (D) 47%, McCain (R) 43%
Obama (D) 52%, Thompson (R) 36%

Clinton (D) 46%, Romney (R) 44%
Huckabee (R) 48%, Clinton (D) 43%
Giuliani (R) 46%, Clinton (D) 42%
McCain (R) 49%, Clinton (D) 42%
Clinton (D) 48%, Thompson (R) 42%

Edwards (D) 50%, Romney (R) 38%
Edwards (D) 47%, Huckabee (R) 41%
Giuliani (R) 45%, Edwards (D) 44%
McCain (R) 46%, Edwards (D) 42%
Edwards (D) 51%, Thompson (R) 35%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. BMFAFB
BookMarked for after FootBall. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Delete
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 03:28 PM by Gloria
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Another non-substantive post n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Pardon me, I'll rephrase....rehashing as usual...no real hard questions
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 03:30 PM by Gloria
Clear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Great interview....Sorry I missed it. And yes....
...he nailed it again as usual. He always amazes me at how eloquently he can answer those supposedly 'gotcha' questions. What an unbelievably awesome President he will be. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm impressed
Thank you for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Solid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. WOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Obama for the fucking win. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC