Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich Votes Against Afghan War Fund

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:06 PM
Original message
Kucinich Votes Against Afghan War Fund
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/29438

Kucinich Votes Against Afghan War Fund
Submitted by davidswanson on Tue, 2007-12-18 21:58. Congress


“Our Troops Are At Risk, Occupying A Narco-State In Which Heroin Production Is At Record Levels”

WASHINGTON, D.C. (December 17, 2007) — Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) released the following statement in opposition to the 2008 omnibus appropriations bill presently before the House of Representatives:

“The dangerous bill contains three items that I feel compelled to bring to the attention of my Colleagues and the American people: more funding for the war in Afghanistan, more funding for nuclear energy, and funding that would support dirty coal.

“The omnibus bill provides another $31 billion for Afghanistan. The House continues to fund a fruitless war in Afghanistan," Kucinich said.

“Just as we must get out of Iraq, we must leave Afghanistan as well. I have proposed legislation – HR 1234 – to provide for the stability of Iraq as we exit. We must change our direction in this region. The longer we stay, the greater the disaster.”

Kucinich noted that violence in Afghanistan has increased 30 percent over last year. There is no indication that the violence is ending. He also noted that heroin production has drastically increased since 2001. Afghanistan now provides 92 percent of the world’s opium, the main source of heroin.

“What in the world are American troops doing occupying a country while at the same time opium production is going through the roof? We know why the Bush Administration went into Iraq – oil. What is the reason we are staying in Afghanistan? Our troops are at risk, occupying a narco-state while heroin production is at record levels,” Kucinich said.

The counterproductive nature of the U.S. influence in Afghanistan and the corruption that has followed is clearly exemplified by the opium trade. Afghani government officials warn that, within the Afghan central government, former warlords now work as district and local police chiefs, as well as government officials.

“Instead of suppressing opium production in Afghanistan the trade is increasingly in the hands of warlords while eliminating smaller agents trying to make a living through this illicit trade,” Kucinich said.

“The Congress has condemned poppy cultivation for its financial support of insurgents, militias, and terrorist organizations operating in Afghanistan. Yet under our watch this chaos and corruption has ensued. Additionally our troops are at risk of drug addiction from the easy availability of heroin in Afghanistan.

“As the United States seeks to abate terrorism we must also learn from the consequences related to our foreign policy. After six years of destruction and death the United States should discontinue this immoral policy and immediately begin high-level diplomatic negotiations with the countries of the Middle East in an effort to establish true stability and peace in the region,” Kucinich said.

This omnibus appropriations bill also contains $20.5 billion for subsidies for nuclear energy, which is an attempt to prop up an energy source that is not financially viable without extreme government largesse. It creates toxic waste that lasts thousands of years or longer, even when the United States can't deal with the waste that has already been generated.

Finally, in this time of heightened awareness of the challenges posed by global warming, this bill provides $8 billion in loan guarantees for dirty coal.

“The urgency of global warming requires that we avoid taking a step backward for every step we take forward. At a minimum, this bill should direct the $28.5 billion for these unsustainable energy sources toward energy sources on which we will come to rely, whether we want to or not, like solar, wind, and geothermal technologies.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe the Bushies are getting a cut from the opium business...
We'll have to add NO BLOOD FOR OPIUM to our signs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go, Dennis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's my candidate!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you DK!
:bounce: I can't wait to vote for him! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datadiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. My conscience vote in the primary
I will vote for Kucinich in the primary. I will also vote for the Democratic candidate in the general election. If it's Hillary or Obama, whose health care proposals I do not agree with, I will vote for them anyway. Any Democrat is better than the crooks we have in office now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. As usual, Dennis is correct.
This is the man who should be the next President of the United States. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you Dennis....
I am so glad you are speaking out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's correct.
Again.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Most likely CIA opium
Whenever things aren't working in this admin, you have to ask who's making money off of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC