PatSeg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-14-07 08:51 PM
Original message |
| Email from Patrick Leahy - "In contempt of Congress" |
|
It should never have had to come to this.
Yesterday, on a bipartisan vote of 12-7, the Senate Judiciary Committee ruled that White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten and Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove are in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with subpoenas issued in the U.S. Attorneys investigation. As Chairman of the Committee, I have gone to real lengths to avoid this sort of legal confrontation, but after many months the White House has yet to cooperate with these requests from our investigation -- and the American people deserve the truth.
The President denies any involvement in the political firings of Justice Department officials. Yet he and his staff continue to hide behind the veil of "executive privilege." They have essentially asserted that this privilege -- historically applied very narrowly -- covers all documents and information in their possession. It's a dramatic departure from precedent, and the Bush-Cheney administration's blanket claim of immunity from congressional subpoenas flies in the face of our system of checks and balances.
This is not about pulling a partisan "gotcha" or scoring political points. After all, Committee members of both parties supported yesterday's ruling. No, this is about defending Congress's oversight function and protecting the right of the American people to know the whole truth about the mass firings of attorneys at the Justice Department. Withholding critical evidence requested by a subpoena is a serious crime, and it's time we reminded the President and his staff that they are not above the law.
The White House's refusal to cooperate with our investigation casts further doubt on its contention that it had nothing to do with the political firings of Justice Department officials. In fact, it's now quite clear that political officials in the White House pressured federal prosecutors to bring partisan cases and sought retribution against those who refused.
Since World War II, presidential advisers have testified before Congress 74 times, either voluntarily or compelled by subpoenas -- never once refusing to comply. Executive privilege should not be invoked to prevent investigations into wrongdoing, and certainly should not prevail.
Thank you for your support for holding the Bush-Cheney Administration accountable as we get to the bottom of the mass firings of U.S. attorneys.
Sincerely, Patrick Leahy U.S. Senator
|
bonito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-14-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bush's Impeachable Crimes, and the Growing Risks of Martial Law http://www.democrats.com/node/15089 I say to Congress to put up and call or forever be enslaved!
|
PatSeg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-14-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Sometimes I think they're too close to the situation |
|
to see the big picture, which is what nightmares are made of.
|
bonito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-14-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 6. No doubt they are and we should know it |
|
Leahy was one of the Senators that was sent anthrax, he knows what their up against he's in a position to call them out even more so now, what they should realize is the whole world is watching and waiting for this nightmare to end and at the same time you, me, all of us here are being held accountable in the eyes of the world, we were so much in good standing in just about everything as we are today when Clinton was at the helm, I wish they would just wake up,its that ole backbone thing.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-14-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Thanks for the link. I signed on. (nt) |
Evergreen Emerald
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-14-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
Auntie Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-14-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 20th 2013, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |