Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I hope to hell that either Huckabee or Gulaini gets the Repuke nod

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:56 AM
Original message
I hope to hell that either Huckabee or Gulaini gets the Repuke nod
Gulini will be raked over the coals. His only claim to fame is the bullshit myth that he'll protect all the scaredy cats from the boogieman. When that myth is exploded, he'll go down the tubes faster than a barrel going over Niagara Falls because the incredible number of skeletons in his closet far outweigh any good this one-dimensional asshole could ever do for the country. Conservatives hate him, and if he gets the nod, you can almost count on a third party candidate hitting the trail from the repuke contingent.

Huckabee would be the smoothest sneakiest talker of the bunch, but the only people who would ever go for this fucking nut are the neocons. I would imagine that even the moderate Republicans would be weary of this fanatic. The nutcases from the far right can piss and moan all day about things like Roe vs Wade, but at the end of the day, the huge majority of people in this country, including many repukes, will never actully turn something as important as this over because it would end up being political suicide in the long run for them to do so. Plus, Huckabee wouldn't come off as being strong, foreign policy wise. All that we'd have to do to defeat Huckabee would be to highlight one or two of his incredibly pathetic intolerant quotes he made that even made some of his fellow repukes blush in embarrassment.

I don't see any Repuke having a chance except Mitt Romney, but we should be able to handle him, too, pasty faced Ken-doll that he is.

Who would you think would be the easiest to beat, and who do you think would be the hardest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Depends on who the Dem nominee is...
Huckabee is too out there and open about his more fringe religious beliefs. He lacks the slickness of a Romney and lacks the aggressiveness of a Gulliani.

Whoever the nominee is will get a free ride from the mainstream press so we better just get used to that now. Right now, the oppossing republican campaigns are bringing out dirt on each other and on occassion those stories get reported in mainstream news outlets. But once their nominee is chosen all negative stories about the republican candidates will stop on the part of the mainstream media and will start to focus on whoever the democratic nominee is. Period. There is no doubt about this in my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. McCain would be the toughest--but age and war-cheerleading will bring him down, ultimately.
If Rudy survives to become the nominee, despite all the dirt on him, he might be tough--that would prove that he's Teflon, and it would be hard to make anything else stick to him. He's smart and scrappy, too--but I think we could defeat him. Romney is just not likeable. That's less forgiveable than flipping and flopping--beatable. Huckabee ONLY has likeability--he's an ignorant doofus on the level of GWB, and he's going to remind people of a better-spoken GWB--and I doubt he'd be the nominee anyway (GOPers who aren't single-issue pro-life don't much care for him). Thompson--no problem. Too lethargic. I think we're lookin' pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. mccain is history, but I agree with you guiliani will be a tough challenge
and the republicans know it. That is why pat robertson endorsed him. They believe he stands the best chance, and unfortunately, I think they are right

Of course it depends who our candidate is. Personally, I think Edwards stands the best chance, followed by Obama. However, I think it will be Hillary, and the election will go right down to the wire.

Our nominee MUST take every blue state to win


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. I disagree. guliani stands the best chance for the repukes, and they know it
The bad newsabo ut guliani is hardly being pursued by the MSM, and it won't be. As far as right wing repugs not voting for him, I wouldn't count on it. Winning is everything for them. They realize that huckabee can never get the independent vote, and romney won't make it because he is a Morman.

When you have pat robertson endorsing gulaini, that should tell you that the extreme right of the republican party will support him

Unfortunately, of our top 3 candidates, Hillary will probably get the nomination, and will have the most difficult time beating him

The hate that the MSM has propagated against her for the last 15 years will be very hard to overcome

This is not meant to be a hit against Hillary, because I will vote for whoever the Democratic candidate is without hesitation, but it is the way I view the situation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think one of the main things Guiliani has going for him is
name recognition, and there are so many uninformed voters who don't bother to keep up with anything, so that's a definite strong point in his favor unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You hit the nail on the head, "uninformed voters" /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. The neocons are terrified of Huckabee, as are business conservatives.
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 11:25 AM by Occam Bandage
Neither of them particularly like the religious right; they see them as a pack of slack-jawed morons that can be herded about. Huckabee represents a sort of slave rebellion; he has more appeal to the Jesus voters than the neocon-friendly Giuliani or the omnipanderer Romney, while pushing populist (and commerce-crushing) policies on the domestic front, and seeming entirely lukewarm on the foreign-policy front. A Huckabee nomination would have deep repercussions in the Republican party.

Personally, I think McCain is by far the strongest candidate. However, he's not really the number one choice among any of the branches of the Republican party, so he's got an uphill climb. If he wins, though...well, he's the only candidate I don't feel good about going up against. It'll be a tough battle no matter who they pick, but McCain is the only candidate I wouldn't say we have the edge against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. You say Gulaini, you say Gulini
let's call the whole thing off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thompson, hands down
Stupid as an axe-handle with the charisma of a snapping turtle. His wife probably wouldn't even vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. i hope its guiliani.only because even if they cheat and somehow win, he is less insane
then the rest of them. at least he is still pro choice and doesn't believe in rounding up the gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC