|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 11:01 AM Original message |
| Tim Robbins to stump for Edwards in Iowa City |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| DS1
|
Mon Dec-10-07 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Yes! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar
|
Mon Dec-10-07 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Love them both... JRE and Tim ! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Common Sense Party
|
Mon Dec-10-07 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Robbins is only stumping for Edwards because they're both |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
|
Mon Dec-10-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. lol |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Common Sense Party
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 15. It seems that way. Every motive is suspect, and everything is racial |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
|
Mon Dec-10-07 08:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 29. LOL...Will Smith is stumping for Obama |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Unbelievable ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Common Sense Party
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 14. Is your sarcasm and irony detector on the fritz? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 18. It would have to be permanently defective to not see the sarcasm |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Common Sense Party
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 20. Agreed. Sad, isn't it? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 21. Fortunately there are still lots of good people here |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 32. Gee thanks |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
|
Mon Dec-10-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 35. Lol - and you didn't get that my post was NOT about you but about the general environment |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 33. Guess it's broken |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. And what will Robbins and Edwards answer be to the questions... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. Even Micheal Moore regrets voting for Nader |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smokey nj
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 13. On Real Time in 2004, Michael Moore and Bill Maher both begged |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Donnachaidh
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 10. Has Hillary given Murdoch's money back yet? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 23. Many good progressives voted for Nader, and all are apologetic ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
|
Mon Dec-10-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 31. hillary, why are you such |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Didn't he and his partner Susan campaign for Nader last time around? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. I say let's WELCOME ALL THE NADER VOTERS!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 22. Right on .. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smokey nj
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. No. In 2004, Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon campaigned for John Kerry. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. Thanks for the correction Smokey. I know better now. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 19. That Phil Donahue guy? Did you vote for Bush? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
|
Mon Dec-10-07 08:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 30. Did you like lose |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. Susan Sarandon Must Be Right Behind... Funny How These Are The |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 26. All true progressives .. Edwards is our hope. Hillary is falling |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 27. Kevin Bacon is joining Edwards in Iowa, too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. OMG, that would be worth flying to Iowa City to see. I love Edwards and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. The Shawshank effect. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kimmerspixelated
|
Mon Dec-10-07 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Ah!!! MR. tall and dimply! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
|
Mon Dec-10-07 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. I'm not an Edwards supporter but I think this is great - the more Dem voters get engaged the better. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-10-07 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. Yeah but will he be able to woo those women over the age of 55 that Oprah's out to get from Hillary? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Dec-11-07 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 36. Good for him! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Nov 21st 2009, 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC