By Hendrik Herzberger. Personally, Huckabee scares me least of any of the Republicans ... not because of his positions (which I mostly oppose) nor because I think he'd be easier to beat ... but because he's a kind of non-scary guy (as the article puts it, "not an angry conservative").
There is one thing he said I think is pretty damned brilliant:
Huckabee speaks calmly, in stories, parables, and extended metaphors. The foreign-policy section of his talk (what there was of it) was a leisurely account of how his children laugh at him when he tells them that his grade-school class used to “duck and cover” in fear of a Soviet nuclear attack. “Somehow, in our naïveté,” he said, “we thought that if the world is coming to an end the crosshairs of the first nuclear missile would be aimed at the Brookwood Elementary School, in Hope, Arkansas.” The section’s conclusion—and the speech’s only hint at how the speaker might deal with what he called “a very dangerous world”—was a single sentence: “I want to be the President that helps to make it so that your grandchildren laugh at you when you tell them you used to have to put your toothpaste in a plastic bag and take your shoes off to get on an airplane to go somewhere in this country.”
Then, there's what he says about education, which actually makes sense:
Like another governor from Hope who once ran for President, Candidate Huckabee reserves his real passion for matters domestic. On education, he talked not about standardized tests or back-to-basics but about something like their polar opposite. “We have to change and reform the education system so that we’re capturing both the left and the right sides of the kid’s brain,” he said. “There ought to be a new focus not just in math and science—which there needs to be—but also a balanced focus on music and art and right-side-of-the-brain activities. Otherwise, we end up with an education system that’s like a data download—a great database but no processor.”
Or immigrants:
In the question period, the candidate declined several invitations to serve up red meat. Asked about immigration, he hurried through the assurances required by the current perfervid mood among Republicans—seal the border, no amnesty—to add, “People who come to this country would rather come here legally if they had the choice. Nobody wants to break the law because it’s fun to break the law. . . . When it takes seven to twelve years to get a permit to come so you can pick lettuce, you’ll decide, ‘In seven years my family will have starved. I think what I’ll do is, I’ll just pay somebody a couple of thousand bucks to haul me across the border, and maybe I’ll never get caught.’ ” If there was demagoguery in any of this, it was the demagoguery of policy vagueness and simplistic hope, not the demagoguery of anger and fear. At least Huckabee’s stories of people in need don’t have the patronizing, self-congratulatory sound of “compassionate conservatism.” (Anyhow, Huckabee calls it “conservativism.”)
Anyway, you can read it (it's not long). He's a conservative, but not totally insane.
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2007/12/03/071203...