Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama speaks with The Advocate- Great Interview on Donnie, the campaign, etc.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 08:39 PM
Original message
Obama speaks with The Advocate- Great Interview on Donnie, the campaign, etc.
Some black gay activists I’ve spoken to say this doesn’t make them question Obama the senator, but it does make them question the campaign -- do they really understand the nuances of these issues, are they really sitting down and talking with gay folks, because it seems like this decision came purely through the lens of faith?

Look, these kinds of issues are going to crop up inevitably through the course of campaigns. It’s important to recognize that these are issues that every Democratic candidate who has African-American ministers as supporters may have to confront. It just so happened that it popped up on the screen in this particular instance. But I assure you, I am not the only candidate who’s got a black minister or a white minister who’s supporting them prominently who subscribes to similar views.

Part of the reason that we have had a faith outreach in our campaigns is precisely because I don’t think the LGBT community or the Democratic Party is served by being hermetically sealed from the faith community and not in dialogue with a substantial portion of the electorate, even though we may disagree with them.

Part of what I have done in my campaign and in my career is be willing to go to churches and talk to ministers and tell them exactly what I think. And go straight at some of these issues of homophobia that exist in the church in a way that no other candidate has done. I believe that’s important. We can try to pretend these issues don’t exist and then be surprised when a gay marriage amendment pops up and is surprisingly successful in a state. I think the better strategy is to take it head on and we’ve got to show up. These people of faith may be operating in part out of unfamiliarity, or they may be insular in terms of how they’re viewing LGBT issues, they may not understand how what they say may be hurtful, and the only way for us to be able to communicate that is to show up.

I know you’re in a difficult position here trying to balance these two constituencies -- but by keeping McClurkin on the tour, didn't you essentially choose your Christian constituency over your gay constituency?

No, I profoundly disagree with that. This is not a situation where I have backed off my positions one iota. You’re talking to somebody who talked about gay Americans in his convention speech in 2004, who talked about them in his announcement speech for the president of the United States, who talks about gay Americans almost constantly in his stump speeches. If there’s somebody out there who’s been more consistent in including LGBT Americans in his or her vision of what America should be, then I would be interested in knowing who that person is.

One of the things that always comes up in presidential campaigns is, if you’ve got multiple supporters all over the place, should the candidate then be held responsible for the every single view of every one of his supporters? And obviously that’s not possible. And if I start playing that game, then it will be very difficult for me to do what I think I can do best, which is bring the country together.

Look, when I went to Rick Warren’s church at Saddleback, he was under enormous heat because, among his constituency, my position on LGBT issues and my position on abortion is anathema. So his position could have been, we will not have Obama speak because he does not subscribe to our views on these two issues. To his credit, he allowed me to speak, in his church, from his pulpit, to 2,000 evangelicals. And I didn’t trim my remarks, I specifically told them, “I think you guys are wrong when it comes to issues like condom distribution.” And by the way, I got a standing ovation.

My views on gay issues and on choice issues are well-known. I did not trim my sails in the conversation I had with them. And I think as a consequence of appearances like that, I am helping to encourage understanding that will ultimately strengthen the cause of LGBT rights.

At some point, if we are going to have a conversation on these issues, what I expect to be judged by in the LGBT community is, have I been a strong advocate, have I been a forceful advocate, have I avoided these issues in any way. And If I have not, then that’s how I expect to be judged.

Does this tour mark a turning point in the campaign where you’re more focused on wooing voters than fund-raising?

I recognize why this has attracted attention in the LGBT community, in terms of our overall campaign strategy, it’s just one among multiple things that we’ve been doing in South Carolina. People in South Carolina listen to gospel music, so we have organized some gospel concerts. Black folks in South Carolina frequent barbershops and beauty shops, so we’ve had a barbershop–beauty shop strategy. And by the way, I can’t vouch for the opinions of every barbershop and beauty shop owner in South Carolina. But that is where people go, and so we’ve organized a particular way of reaching out to African-American voters in the barbershops and beauty shops. So this is just part of an ongoing strategy with multiple parts.



More at:

http://advocate.com/news_detail_ektid50021.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. so obama thinks dems and gays have no faith or not as good faith? barf!
"...I don’t think the LGBT community or the Democratic Party is served by being hermetically sealed from the faith community..." well Mr Obama I know lots of dems and some gays and they have just as much faith or more than you or any or your crowd.

as far as your faith crowd goes, let's compare the number of "faith" people murdered by gays vs number of gays murdered by your "faith" friends in the last 2000 years.

Msongs
www.msongs.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemFemme Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. An Obama thread without faux outrage is like a day without diarrhea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I hope you know that having diarrhea every day is not normal
Get thee to a GI specialist pronto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemFemme Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. The Advocate scored a great interview with Obama. Guess they like him too!
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 01:43 AM by DemFemme
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
46. I think the reference was to diarrhea of the mouth
which is indeed a daily event for that poster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I have to tell you, you are very consistent and constant
when it comes to criticize Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. "My views on gay issues are well-known." So dump McClurkin, Sen Obama.
He's demonstrated nothing but cowardice as he panders to the anti-gay bigots and evangelicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phen43 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. good response!!
Senator Obama is such an intelligent, reasonable man. He prides himself in his ability to see things from the people's point of view and reach out in any way he can to convey his message to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. He has no chance. That's the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent interview.
I think Obama hits just the right notes and I have no doubt whatsoever that he's absolutely sincere.

Unfortunately, you can't please some people any of the time if you don't please them all of the time--their loss.


GObama!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grandrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fantastic interview! (K&R)
Thanks for posting! :) :thumbsup: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good interview, but it doesn't help a bit. n/t
Edited on Fri Oct-26-07 09:04 PM by geek tragedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncabot22 Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Great interview!
Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks for the link, Katz.
Great interview. I'm proud of Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Aaaaaarghhh!
He doesn't get it at all.

IT"S NOT A GAY COMMUNITY VS. FAITH COMMUNITY ISSUE.

The two are not mutually exclusive.

There are plenty of gays who are in the faith community. Being gay does not mean you are anti religion.

He does not get this at all. And it's VERY basic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Deal with disagreements head-on, let's not be hermetically sealed off from each other
this is what Obama is all about. If this is what dooms his candidacy in the end, he's not the loser, we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
92. I was a volunteer at last night's "Embrace the Change" concert
I shared "ticket taker" duties with an ex-Black Panther who runs a storefront ministry in an inner city neighborhood, and we shared a ride with a gay Obama volunteer. I do canvassing and voter registration with these guys almost every Saturday, so I know them well. During the ride home we all admitted that working on this campaign has changed our lives. The campaign has given us the opportunity to meet people we never would have met in a town where residents proudly fly the Confederate flag, and we've made friends we'll keep long after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. I forget to mention,,,,
the concert was great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #93
97. Cool...and cool
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
104. If this is what Obama is all about,
then why did he sing a different tune with Don Imus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ok Obama, invite a holocaust denier onto your tour...
...we can't be hermetically sealed from them can we? No big deal that you chose a man who declared a war on gays. it's a mere differnec of opinion.

talk about a double standard, and thank you all for supporting Obama and showing how many democrats still treat gays as second-class citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Obama is a great candidate. A man that will fight for social justice for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Many in the LGBT community cannot believe that anymore.
Edited on Fri Oct-26-07 10:48 PM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. That would be the narrow-minded segment of the LGBT community.
I doubt they are the majority in the community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. I work within the LGBT community here in SF.
I have pressed them on this issue, and they all laugh it off calling it a "political hand grenade being lobbed by some posing as tortured souls to sink Obama's candidacy." That's a direct quote from my fabulous accountant, Karl, who calls himself "queer as a $3 bill." That virtual regional consensus here in SF leads me to believe the sustained outrage here at DU is suspect in some corners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #47
61. Karl is totally right.
I bet we'll see a lot of candidate-bashers suddenly stop posting after the primaries are over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
70. Fabulous accountant
One man's opinion which is very cynical. He's obviously made up his mind on O and nothing will move him from that support.

His assumption is that it's people who are against Obama who are voicing anger over this. I have the impression from many of the DUers here who are concerned about this matter is that their main interest is integrity toward the LGBT community. I haven't gotten the impression that they are out to get Obama. Some have been Obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. I could post quotes also from
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 08:29 PM by AtomicKitten
my fabulous lawyer, my fabulous G.P., my fabulous hairdresser, and my fabulous veterinarian. How about from the outreach hospice group I work with and all our clients? My LGBT friends? I did a survey because this whole thing is something I'm trying very hard to understand.

But of note is they all feel the same way, without exception, and they support various candidates so I trust their input on this. That really resonates with me because clearly there is a disconnect between the real world and some of the, um, louder people on DU on this.

If you have a better explanation for the disconnect, I'd like to hear it. Someone suggested to me that SF is cooler and more progressive, but I'm not sure that's it or at least not completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. Real world vs DU
We are real people here too. I don't really care what the supposed majority opinion is among LGBT people. I know how I feel about this and apparently other LGBT DUers feel the same way.

Having lived in S.F. for a short time and hearing and reading what some people said at the time (in the 80s), I recall that people who had moved there from other way less gay-friendly places saw a disconnect between themselves and S.F. LGBTs. Perhaps this has something to do with the disconnect you are observing. S.F.ers can lose touch with the struggles of people who live elsewhere than S.F. So this issue may have more meaning to those not living in a privileged gay-friendly city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. I wouldn't feel abandoned if I were you.
I support and work with legal teams trying to open up equal treatment under the law for all Americans across this entire country. They also advocate on behalf of those deprived of fair treatment in the judicial system with monies for DNA testing. They also are fighting local anti-abortion legal teams trying to make access to safe and legal abortions impossible, having already admitted if they can't stop them they intend to make them inaccessible.

Don't think for a minute SF'ers aren't tuned in to the inequities across this country. I find myself working on behalf of people here who have called me a racist and a bigot, and it has left me with with a bitter taste in my mouth. I have to frequently remind myself that the work is for the greater good and to pay no attention to the ankle-biters.

Obama has a strong record of advocating for equal treatment under the law, something I strongly believe in. If you choose to turn your back on him over this, that is your prerogative. But Barack Obama is a decent man trying to lead Americans in finding common ground. I believe in that philosophy with all my heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. Thank you
I'm sick of others telling us we're making too big a deal of this, and that we're not representative of real LGBTs, because their "way cool gay friend" thinks Obama is still peachy keen no matter what he does.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. well, that was practically what I said if you replace all my words with yours
It's unfortunate that you have to twist people's words for dramatic effect and yet still expect to be taken seriously.

Snaps for drama:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. What?
No diatribe about your tireless efforts for the needy? I feel so cheated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. and your complete utter lack of grace is duly noted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. As was yours from the beginning.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. Your sexual orientation doesn't give you license -
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 09:35 PM by AtomicKitten
to behave like a rude, boorish jackass.

Your caustic 'tude puts gay rights back about three decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. What do you think gives you license to?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. From what I've seen of Obama supporters lately
You're par for the course. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. And you I'm sorry to say represent a tiny microcosm
of bitter, unpleasant people that couldn't strategize their way out of a paper bag much less actually accomplish some of the goals you whine about. And that is most certainly vomit-inducing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #87
101. Remember
You attacked me, unprovoked, when I was replying to another person. So don't give me a bunch of garbage because I didn't respond with rainbows and butterflies. You are by far one of the most caustic people I've come across here and I am glad to add you to my growing ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #47
103. I think Karl's on to something here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. if he thought it would score him more votes he probably would.
he is quite desperate because Hillary is leaving him in the dust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nice interview, I still think his campaign made a mistake
I don't expect him to change, as this was all thought about beforehand.

Myself, I would prefer that religions be hermetically sealed in a plastic bag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R from this accused homophobe who does grassroots work for LGBT community
Nice interview. Wow, to think that all of us Obama fans are told we are bigots and homophobes and can still read this article....

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. You too?
I not only volunteer my time and money, but my business focuses on financial planning for "non-traditional" families. All my same-sex couple clients will be very shocked to learn what a homobigot I secretly am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Ok - I gotta ask.
You have mentioned this several times recently - What exactly is grassroots work in the LGBT community?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
49. Those are some loud crickets, don't you think?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #49
95. I thought about it and thought about it.
I could not think of any situation where I had observed a straight person doing "grassroots outreach" in my community except, or course, for the Christian Taliban standing on the curb and yelling at us over their microphones as we proudly march by each year.

I have no idea what it could mean but I was willing to be educated as ZZ has repeatedly claimed such effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #95
102. I'd sort of wondered about that myself
I'd imagined Phelps and clan thinking of themselves as grassroots outreach. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
99. And never lets us uppity queers forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. I like his approach of bringing diverse people together!
Edited on Fri Oct-26-07 10:23 PM by Pushed To The Left
LGBT people and evangelicals together as a team behind the same candidate! The more I think about it, the more positive of an approach I think it is. Maybe being surrounded by the other Obama supporters will help to influence McClurkin to change his radical views. (Don't get me wrong: I still think it was a horrible decision to have him on the stage.) One thing I've noticed about volunteering with the Obama campaign is that it draws a very diverse group politically. Not a bad advantage to have for a general election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Your average African-American leader supports LGBT rights
And that includes at least some ministers. The following is from the Laura Flanders book Blue Grit--

The next Democratic candidate considering running for president would do well to talk to activists like Justin Turner of Cincinnati Citizens to Restore Fairness, fighting to overturn the anti-gay Article XII.

From a skimpy minority of 32 percent who voted in favor of repeal in February 2004, the Restore Fairness campaign won over 53 percent of the vote on November 2. The campaign set a goal of turning out 60,000 supporive votes; the repeal proposition won with over 65,000. The gains came disproportionately from the most conservative parts of town.

"The key was to put a human face on the message and to address it head on," Turner told me on the phone from his home after the proposition passed.

Kerry campaigned in Cincinnati with the losing, instead of the winning, side. He brought onto the stage with him the one group of African American leaders that was not part of the Cincinnati for Fairness Coalition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. It was a smart move and a good interview. . .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
28. That's better than the previous released statements
Look, when I went to Rick Warren’s church at Saddleback, he was under enormous heat because, among his constituency, my position on LGBT issues and my position on abortion is anathema. So his position could have been, we will not have Obama speak because he does not subscribe to our views on these two issues. To his credit, he allowed me to speak, in his church, from his pulpit, to 2,000 evangelicals. And I didn’t trim my remarks, I specifically told them, “I think you guys are wrong when it comes to issues like condom distribution.” And by the way, I got a standing ovation.

My views on gay issues and on choice issues are well-known. I did not trim my sails in the conversation I had with them. And I think as a consequence of appearances like that, I am helping to encourage understanding that will ultimately strengthen the cause of LGBT rights.

At some point, if we are going to have a conversation on these issues, what I expect to be judged by in the LGBT community is, have I been a strong advocate, have I been a forceful advocate, have I avoided these issues in any way. And If I have not, then that’s how I expect to be judged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
30. K&R. It takes a lot of political courage and strong values to do what Obama is doing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toughboy Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. Stand by your man, CTGuy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
31. This is a great interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Saturday morning kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
32. Great interview on "Donnie" . . .first name basis and all!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
35. The Ultimate Hypocrisy Of Barack Obama (from OP's link)
Barack Obama, who has attacked Sen Clinton often regarding those who back her, sniveled this in his simpering interview with the Advocate:

One of the things that always comes up in presidential campaigns is, if you’ve got multiple supporters all over the place, should the candidate then be held responsible for the every single view of every one of his supporters?


Barack Obama says Yes, unless it's me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. i'm not familiar with that
which supporter did he attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
67. *crickets*
Another hit and run, baseless smear against Obama I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
36. I read that interview also.
I just have one question for him.

In his book "The Audacity of Hope", Obama talks about his opposition to same-sex marriage equality (a stance that I profoundly disagree with. He says that same-sex marriage conflicts with his religious beliefs...another pernicious example of why someone religious beliefs should NOT interfere with my LEGAL rights as a gay American) and how a lesbian couple spoke to him of their distress over his opposition to same-sex marriage...and he talked of how saddened he was that his stance causes pain for gay and lesbian people.

My question: does Obama really, truly, understand how angry, how hurt, how outraged we are? He sounds, in that interview, like he's rattling off points from some position paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Not. And THIS gaffe really left the cake out in the rain
As Pam Saulding put it:

The last thing a crowd of black folks who have a problem with homosexuality needs is: 1) to be "told" by the Obama campaign that a message about tolerance must be delivered from a white voice of faith, and 2) to have their beliefs confirmed that being gay is "a white man's perversion." Coming from a white pastor under these circumstances, can only be seen as paternalistic and patronizing; the shields of defensiveness will go up, the message will be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #39
100. Seriously
He just doesn't get it. People will pat him on the back for this statement but all it tells me is how fucking clueless he is WRT this issue.

I thought he was just naive but he DOESN'T GET IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obamian Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
91. Despite his religious beliefs, Obama has always left the door open for him
to support gay marriage in the future.

From a 2004 intervew with Obama:

WCT: Do you have a position on marriage vs. civil unions?

Obama: I am a fierce supporter of domestic-partnership and civil-union laws. I am not a supporter of gay marriage as it has been thrown about, primarily just as a strategic issue. I think that marriage, in the minds of a lot of voters, has a religious connotation. I know that’s true in the African-American community, for example. And if you asked people, ‘should gay and lesbian people have the same rights to transfer property, and visit hospitals, and et cetera,’ they would say, ‘absolutely.’ And then if you talk about, ‘should they get married?’, then suddenly ...

WCT: There are more than 1,000 federal benefits that come with marriage. Looking back in the 1960s and inter-racial marriage, the polls showed people against that as well.

Obama: Since I’m a product of an interracial marriage, I’m very keenly aware of ...

WCT: But you think, strategically, gay marriage isn’t going to happen so you won’t support it at this time?

Obama: What I’m saying is that strategically, I think we can get civil unions passed. I think we can get SB 101 passed. I think that to the extent that we can get the rights, I’m less concerned about the name. And I think that is my No. 1 priority, is an environment in which the Republicans are going to use a particular language that has all sorts of connotations in the broader culture as a wedge issue, to prevent us moving forward, in securing those rights, then I don’t want to play their game.

WCT: If Massachusetts gets marriage and this gives momentum to the proposed federal Constitutional amendment against gay marriage?

Obama: I would oppose that.
http://outlineschicago.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=3931
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. It's called coalition building.
Roosevelt and Johnson were masters of the art. They had to get the votes of some really nasty people to get their programs approved, but they delivered the goods. Obama says straight out, I don't agree with you on this, but we need to work together on that. It's more honest and more effective than someone who claims to be both and neither this nor that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Johnson never tried to get the southern racist Democrats on his side
He was able to get the Civil Rights Act passed by appealing to Republicans. Johnson used his connections at the Washington Post to put pressure on Republicans to vote for the bill. He did NOT compromise with southern Democrats.

Obama can curry the religious vote without actually inviting a vocal bigotted minister (someone who has the opportunity to influence church people and, so, has a particular responsibility not to spread misinformation and bigotry) to a campaign event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. In the interests of historical accuracy, you are wrong. Very wrong
LBJ's ability and willingness to accept and pursue support from any quarter is legendary. It's why he is known as The Master of the Senate. He had a long history of siding with republicans, southern dems, and other bigots while a member of Congress. The Hunt Bros., infamous racists, were his biggest financial supporters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #48
62. My point was
When it came to the Civil Rights Act, he did not toady to the southern Democrats. He knew when it came to that issue, he could not allow them to compromise the bill, because the interest of the southern Democrats was to keep people of color down---maintain segregation on all levels within their states. There was a point where Johnson did not try to play to the southern racist Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. Then it's a very weak point
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 07:32 PM by cuke
So on one piece of legislation, he didn't cater to southern dems. So what? He had a long history of associating with southern dems, racists, anti-semites, and pretty much anyone he had to work with to get his legislation passed. I would also note that a lot of his work in the Senate involved undermining civil rights bills in the Senate. In fact, if he hadn't done that he never would have been president

And of course he didn't work with southern dems on the Civil RIghts Act. They opposed it. But if they had supported it, he would have worked with them. We know this because he worked with them in the past. In the past, they were his biggest allies. LBJ *WAS* a southern democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. And...Obama wants to "work with" religious evangelists
He doesn't need to "work with" a anti-gay minister. It's like Johnson thinking he "had" to have the support of the southern Democrats in order to get his Civil Rights Act passed, otherwise it just wouldn't mean anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #69
81. I said nothing about Obama in this sub-thread
I referred only to LBJ, but I agree. I just object to the appearance of an assumption that I support the homophobes. I think they should all be cut from the tour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. Sorry,
Didn't realize your post was not connected to Hedgehog's. I didn't look carefully at the sender's name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #84
85. No prob
I do that often
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. "Obama: Fire Imus".
How is this "coalition building"? And why is there a double-standard?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3031317

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Not a double standard, per se
People are free to pick and choose who they associate with for whatever reason they choose. The problem comes in when those reasons are objectionable. It's not necesarily a double-standard. If I had to guess, I'd say this difference is more a matter of political calculation than a double-standard, not that that makes it any better. In fact, it makes it worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Obama refuses to associate with a bigot making racial slurs.
Obama refuses to disassicate himself or his staff with a concert full of bigots that make anti-gay statements.

--Double standard

noun
an ethical or moral code that applies more strictly to one group than to another
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. You assume the decision is based on WHO made the bigoted remark
I assume the decision was based on which group will deliver more votes. If my assumption is accurate, there is no double standard. He'll go with the group that will give him the most votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. So you assume that there are more homophobes than racists in this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. No
I assume there are more homophobes than racists amongst the AfAms of SC. I doubt there will be many racists at those gospel concerts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. So then back to my original point:
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 06:07 PM by JackBeck
Why the double standard with Imus if this was to court votes?

"I assume the decision was based on which group will deliver more votes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. I don't see the double standard here
Obama has chosen to disassociate from racists and to associate with homophobes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Not gonna waste my time leading this dance.
You've proved my point, whether you choose to see it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. It is indeed a double standard
Obama called for Imus to be fired because Imus was a racist.

Yet Obama sees nothing wrong with having several blatant homophobes as part of his campaign fundraiser.

Major double standard. Racists = Bad. Homophobes = OK.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. Glad to see others from the reality-based community checking in.
This place is starting to craft their own version of double-speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Racism and homophobia aren't the same
Nobody can explain why, but they just aren't, apparently. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. If you just say it, that makes it true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toughboy Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
40. I realize yet again that without the input, wisdom and strength of Black women
Black men can be stupid, confused, violent morons. Kind of like men in general. Does Obama support dog fighting? We should find that out now before he dumps that on us. They do dog fighting in SC, no?

Well, it's interesting that The Advocate continues to print stupid almost exclusively white-centric drivel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
42. Obama doesn't get it
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 05:16 PM by goodgd_yall
It's really all about getting elected for him, not principles. Most all candidates compromise their principles to get elected, but for O to allow his campaign to be associated with a gay-basher is inexcusable. He's lost any potential of receiving my vote on this one. I cannot tolerate dancing with the devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
43. This is much better than the previously released statments
I think it's a good interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
60. Anyone who says that Obama lost their vote on this one
has not really informed themselves on who this man is and what he has done in his life. He panders to no one. He has been a strong supporter for LGBT rights since his school days. Having McClurkin sing on the gospel tour was not properly vetted by the campaign, obviously, but ..

1)McClurkin is SINGING at a gospel tour..he's a gospel singer and a very popular one..go figure! I saw him on Oprah. I thought he was awesome. I had no idea about his background until this came up, but the point is, he's SINGING, not speaking or sermonizing about his homophobic views. Obama disagrees vehemently with those views, and his whole life is a testament to that.

2)This whole thing was made an issue by the Clinton campaign feeding the HuffPo article to news organizations, as shown in the WaPo article that is floating around somewhere. Rather typical hypocrisy considering Rev. Mayberry, with the same anti-gay beliefs, endorses Hillary and their campaign seems to celebrate his support http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=2857">link

As I said, if anyone is truly informed about who this man is, and what he has stood for and worked for in his life, then they knew this to be a total non-issue from the beginning. Anyone claiming this was the 'deal breaker' wasn't a supporter to begin with..at least not one who has really studied the man. I have from the moment I heard his 2004 speech at the convention. I don't agree with him on everything but to paint him as a panderer is sheer nonsense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. As a member of the LGBT community
I have considered Obama as closely as I have the other candidates. I was never happy that his opposition to gay marriage was based on his religion. Clinton's and Edward's opposition is too, although I believe Edwards has been the most honest and seems to want to come to a better understanding. But what is dissappointing for me with Obama is that his actions go against the image he has been trying to project: a liberal Democrat who will bring real changes. His actions do not match his message. He IS using a double-standard and it's obvious the LGBT community is not important to him. It's concerns are not of importance to him. If it weren't for the fact he's been questioned about his views on gay marriage, he wouldn't even acknowledge it's existence as a group with particular civil rights concerns, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obamian Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #64
94. Do you have the quote where he says it's based on his religion?
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 10:46 PM by obamian
He has always left the door open for supporting gay marriage in all of the interviews I've seen.

From a 2004 intervew with Obama:

WCT: Do you have a position on marriage vs. civil unions?

Obama: I am a fierce supporter of domestic-partnership and civil-union laws. I am not a supporter of gay marriage as it has been thrown about, primarily just as a strategic issue. I think that marriage, in the minds of a lot of voters, has a religious connotation. I know that’s true in the African-American community, for example. And if you asked people, ‘should gay and lesbian people have the same rights to transfer property, and visit hospitals, and et cetera,’ they would say, ‘absolutely.’ And then if you talk about, ‘should they get married?’, then suddenly ...

WCT: There are more than 1,000 federal benefits that come with marriage. Looking back in the 1960s and inter-racial marriage, the polls showed people against that as well.

Obama: Since I’m a product of an interracial marriage, I’m very keenly aware of ...

WCT: But you think, strategically, gay marriage isn’t going to happen so you won’t support it at this time?

Obama: What I’m saying is that strategically, I think we can get civil unions passed. I think we can get SB 101 passed. I think that to the extent that we can get the rights, I’m less concerned about the name. And I think that is my No. 1 priority, is an environment in which the Republicans are going to use a particular language that has all sorts of connotations in the broader culture as a wedge issue, to prevent us moving forward, in securing those rights, then I don’t want to play their game.

WCT: If Massachusetts gets marriage and this gives momentum to the proposed federal Constitutional amendment against gay marriage?

Obama: I would oppose that.
http://outlineschicago.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=3931
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #60
88. Great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
63. what the fuck is all the fuss the gays are going for Hillary anyway
thats what the media is telling us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. Could you please stop using the phrase
"the gays"? Thank you.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #73
96. Thanks - I hate that expression.
Do we say "the straights". No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NovemberRain Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
89. GLBT
Is there actually any presidential candidate that DOES support gay marriage? Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel.
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 10:09 PM by JackBeck
Next...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
98. "...purely through the lens of faith." The Cosmic trump card for all assholiness
This is yet another example why so many of us have such trouble with religion in politics: it's a form of intellectual aristocracy. Somehow, the fact that he's overwhelmed by his love of his guess at the supernatural gives him a blank check to do as he pleases.

Faith is good; it shouldn't be questioned. It should be given free rein and have guaranteed sway over others. The hell with the fact that those other losers might have a different assumption about the universe, it's reagent-strength I-Me-Mine.

Allowing one's faith to exempt one for one's action is flat-out selfishness, bordering on solipsism. This isn't a virtue, it's an extreme vice. Anyone who wants to justify this as something that just bubbles up from the wellspring of beauteous airy faith is missing the point of the social ugliness of putting faith on a pedestal as a glorious human endeavor.

Perhaps he's so swept away with his belief system that the joy it brings mitigates the pain it forces on "others". If so, he's unfit to lead anyone but a group of people of that belief system, and that's not the United States.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC