Union Leader: Clinton's 'is' moment - Who cares what Words mean

[illinoisprogressive]

*
* Obituaries
* Politics
* Public safety
* Religion
* Roads and Travel
* War on terror
* Sports
* Top 10 stories

PHOTO GALLERY

* On assignment
* Great Places
* Scene Setters
* Monarchs
* Full Page Reprints

CLASSIFIEDS

* Place an ad
* Cars
* Jobs
* Homes

LOCAL VOICES

* Granite Status
* State House Dome
* City Hall
* John Clayton
* Publisher's Notes
* Drew Cline's blog

OUTDOORS

* John Harrigan
* Stacey Cole
* Dick Pinney

NEWHAMPSHIRE.COM

* Concerts
* Nightlife
* Arts, theater

LISTINGS

* Places to visit
* Things to do
* Personals

SPECIAL REPORTS

* ►Primary '08
* The Briggs murder
* Parental notification
* Sex offenders
* ►Manchester school bus routes

CUSTOMER CARE

* ►Home delivery
* ►Easy Charge
* ►One-time payment
* Electronic edition
* Company store
* Cooking school
* Sponsorships

ADVERTISING

* Public notices
* Rate card

SERVICES

* NewsBank archives
* Engagements,
* weddings, births
* Union Leader jobs
* Sponsorships

RSS feed

* About RSS

News tips & feedback
Clinton's 'is' moment: Who cares what words mean?


21 hours, 59 minutes ago

SEN. HILLARY CLINTON pledged in August, "I shall not campaign or participate in any state which schedules a presidential primary election or caucus before Feb. 5, 2008, except for the states of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina."

On Tuesday, she broke her pledge.

Michigan Democratic Chairman Mark Brewer had put all the Democratic candidates' names on the ballot without getting their approval. Four other candidates who signed that pledge -- Joe Biden, John Edwards, Barack Obama and Bill Richardson -- kept their promise by withdrawing their names from Michigan's ballot by Tuesday's deadline. Clinton cynically chose not to. She wants to ingratiate herself with Michigan voters.

The Clinton campaign preposterously claims that the senator is not violating her signed pledge because she is not campaigning in Michigan. But she pledged not to "participate." She is participating. As her husband famously tried to redefine the word "is," she is trying to redefine the word "participate."

(Sen. Chris Dodd also signed the pledge and chose to break it by staying on the Michigan ballot. But he's a small fish, and hardly anyone has noticed.)

Clinton can parse her decision any way she wants, but the obvious truth is that she made a calculated choice to break her word for political advantage. She's a Clinton, so few will be surprised by that. But voters will want to remember that decision. If she'll break her word to participate in a virtually meaningless primary, what won't she break her word for?

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=36993ac7-40a6-40d1-a96a-55253123b1a1&headline=Clinton%27s+%27is%27+moment%3a+Who+cares+what+words+mean%3f

[ElizabethDC]

1. Already posted

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3601985&mesg_id=3601985

[msongs]

2. good thing obama has not been in florida recently nt

[MGKrebs]

3. "Mark Brewer put the Democratic candidates' names on the ballot without getting their approval."

Not sure what else needs to be said.

[superkia]

4. Why will people remember this, they forgot about her in 2002.

If people can forget that she voted yes to giving Bush a loaded weapon when there was no evidence to do so, they certainly don't care about a pledge. I am taken back on how the people who support her can support the propaganda that came out of her mouth back then as she promoted that illegal war and then voted yes. Now she stands and says its Bush's war, she wont even stand up and look presidential by admitting what she said and did. Its just as much Clinton's war as it is Bush's, look at her and Iran? The American public that supports her have really forgotten or just don't care about the thousands of lives that were lost and the blood that sits on her hands. I mean, Kucinich stood up and said there was no evidence but you didn't see him getting any media coverage about it, I remember seeing parts of Clinton's speech on the news. If Clinton would have stood up and spoke the truth, more people would have heard her voice on the issue, instead she chose war? What was her agenda, was it the same as Bush's? Allot of corporations have made a killing from this war, wonder if that had anything to do with her vote?

If she is elected, I hope her supporters realize that the next wars blood will be on their hands too. Why has America become such a hateful country where destroying a country for oil and killing thousands means nothing to the general public, its all about someones favorite team at any cost I guess? Shameless!