Who Will Hack US Elections?

[gateley]

At an e-crime summit at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh last week security experts predicted voters will increasingly be targeted by internet-based dirty tricks campaigns. And that the perpetrators will find it easier to cover their tracks, reports New Scientist.

Dirty tricks are not new. On US election day in 2002, the lines of a "get-out-the-voters" phone campaign sponsored by the New Hampshire Democratic Party were clogged by prank calls. In the 2006 election, 14,000 Latino voters in Orange County, California, received letters telling them it was illegal for immigrants to vote. But in those cases the Republican Party members and supporters were traced and either charged or named in the press. Online dirty tricks will be much less easy to detect, security researchers say.

Spam email could be used against voters, experts say, by giving the wrong location for a polling station, or, as in the Orange County fraud, incorrect details about who has the right to vote. . . Telephone attacks like the New Hampshire prank calls would be harder to trace if made using internet telephony instead of landlines . . . Calls could even be made using a botnet. This would make tracing the perpetrator even harder, because calls wouldn't come from a central location. What's more, the number of calls that can be made is practically limitless.

Internet calls might also be made to voters to sow misinformation, says Christopher Soghoian at Indiana University in Bloomington. "Anonymous voter suppression is going to become a reality." Manipulation can also happen in more subtle ways. In 2006, supporters of California's Proposition 87, for a tax that would fund alternative energy, registered negative-sounding domains including noon87.com and noonprop87.org and then automatically routed visitors to a site touting the proposition's benefits.

The summit's conclusion: the problem will happen. The only unknowns: when and by whom.

http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2007/10/5732_who_will_hack_u.html

[tomreedtoon]

1. Why should the "pros" be the only ones to hack?

I'm not recommending what would be an illegal act. But...

...what if someone with technical sophistication hacked the votes to make the tampering obvious? Like 100,000 write-in votes for Paris Hilton for President?

Or - perhaps more serious - hack the voting machines so they completely fail after a few ballots?

I rather like what Bill Maher suggested in one of his New Rules; that the Presidential election might be decided by an IT customer service rep in New Delhi.

[jillan]

2. It is the 800 lb gorilla in the room. If there is one thing I will critize the Dems about

it's this.

It was such a big issue after the 2004 campaign.
And then we won the majority. It's almost as if they said - problem fixed.