Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Living Under Fascism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:35 AM
Original message
Living Under Fascism
Living Under Fascism
By Rev. Davidson Loehr


11/07/04 -- -- You may wonder why anyone would try to use the word “fascism” in a serious discussion of where America is today. It sounds like cheap name-calling, or melodramatic allusion to a slew of old war movies. But I am serious. I don’t mean it as name-calling at all. I mean to persuade you that the style of governing into which America has slid is most accurately described as fascism, and that the necessary implications of this fact are rightly regarded as terrifying. That’s what I am about here. And even if I don’t persuade you, I hope to raise the level of your thinking about who and where we are now, to add some nuance and perhaps some useful insights.

The word comes from the Latin word “Fasces,” denoting a bundle of sticks tied together. The individual sticks represented citizens, and the bundle represented the state. The message of this metaphor was that it was the bundle that was significant, not the individual sticks. If it sounds un-American, it’s worth knowing that the Roman Fasces appear on the wall behind the Speaker’s podium in the chamber of the US House of Representatives.

Still, it’s an unlikely word. When most people hear the word "fascism" they may think of the racism and anti-Semitism of Mussolini and Hitler. It is true that the use of force and the scapegoating of fringe groups are part of every fascism. But there was also an economic dimension of fascism, known in Europe during the 1920s and '30s as "corporatism," which was an essential ingredient of Mussolini’s and Hitler’s tyrannies. So-called corporatism was adopted in Italy and Germany during the 1930s and was held up as a model by quite a few intellectuals and policy makers in the United States and Europe.

As I mentioned a few weeks ago (in “The Corporation Will Eat Your Soul”), Fortune magazine ran a cover story on Mussolini in 1934, praising his fascism for its ability to break worker unions, disempower workers and transfer huge sums of money to those who controlled the money rather than those who earned it.

Few Americans are aware of or can recall how so many Americans and Europeans viewed economic fascism as the wave of the future during the 1930s. Yet reviewing our past may help shed light on our present, and point the way to a better future. So I want to begin by looking back to the last time fascism posed a serious threat to America.

In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a conservative southern politician is helped to the presidency by a nationally syndicated radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz Windrip - runs his campaign on family values, the flag, and patriotism. Windrip and the talk show host portray advocates of traditional American democracy — those concerned with individual rights and freedoms — as anti-American. That was 69 years ago.

One of the most outspoken American fascists from the 1930s was economist Lawrence Dennis. In his 1936 book, The Coming American Fascism — a coming which he anticipated and cheered — Dennis declared that defenders of “18th-century Americanism” were sure to become "the laughing stock of their own countrymen." The big stumbling block to the development of economic fascism, Dennis bemoaned, was "liberal norms of law or constitutional guarantees of private rights."

So it is important for us to recognize that, as an economic system, fascism was widely accepted in the 1920s and '30s, and nearly worshiped by some powerful American industrialists. And fascism has always, and explicitly, been opposed to liberalism of all kinds...

More: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9926.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a good article!
Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for the post and the link.
It bears repeating, in the light of current conditions in the U.S.:

<snip>

But there was also an economic dimension of fascism, known in Europe during the 1920s and '30s as "corporatism," which was an essential ingredient of Mussolini’s and Hitler’s tyrannies. So-called corporatism was adopted in Italy and Germany during the 1930s and was held up as a model by quite a few intellectuals and policy makers in the United States and Europe.

As I mentioned a few weeks ago (in “The Corporation Will Eat Your Soul”), Fortune magazine ran a cover story on Mussolini in 1934, praising his fascism for its ability to break worker unions, disempower workers and transfer huge sums of money to those who controlled the money rather than those who earned it.

Few Americans are aware of or can recall how so many Americans and Europeans viewed economic fascism as the wave of the future during the 1930s. Yet reviewing our past may help shed light on our present, and point the way to a better future. So I want to begin by looking back to the last time fascism posed a serious threat to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. No one sees this because it is so horrific to contemplate, denial kicks in
The very denial Hitler wrote about and Mein Kampf and both hitler and Goebbels spoke of. The very denial that kills liberty and enshrines tyranny because it refuses to to believe the evidence of it's own eyes.

May God Help us and those who are unfortunate enough to be alive in 2100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "2100?"
I have my doubts about it...

Mankind has always been self-destructive. The crucial difference now is that our species has only existed a very short time with the technologies, capacity, and sadly, the intent, on ensuring our extinction. I mention it because many "level headed" types will attempt to trivialize and downplay such concerns, exclaiming how there's always been people who thought the world was gonna end, but they always overlook the key component of the equation: it's only been since the mid-twentieth century that man has had the technologies to make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I have been accused of being an optimist on this issue before
And yes, things could get bad very much sooner, particularly considering the environment seems to be all postive feedback loops (God's test for species viability = it's so easy to throw the nevironment out of whack from a period of stability that tool-=using species that lack enough mepathy and foresight get naturally selected out, the environment springs back to equilibrium over thousands or millions of years, and life reorganizes and starts again.

Wonder what is going to fill the abandoned mammalian niches at the top? Insecta? Arthropda? Maybe the reptiles will make a comback. Or something wholly new that we cannot even imagine?

THAT's the long-term, and I think we are at or past the point of no return to do anything about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It makes for interesting objective speculation...
...yet subjectively distressing. I believe in a metaphysical reality beyond our five sensory reality, so my spiritual beliefs inevitably come into play on this. Perhaps our next phase will be for our species to evolve beyond where we've been, with much of the collective consciousness poisoned by the Few Big. Sort of like the differing interpretations of the Mayan calender with 2012 apparently signifying The End ... or is the end a beginning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm afraid I don't share your belief in the supernatural, however
I am more than willing to accept it's possibility, as there is clearly so much more left, so many more veils of understanding to pierce that science has yet to uncover.

Leaving out the supernatural parts of it, our future appears to be a combination of Dark Ages and Environmental Collapse along with a Malthusian Population Readjustment as the Earth's carrying capacity is radically reduced from 7 billion to 1 billion or so. THAT is what I am speaking of when I talk of the span of a century, centuries or even millenia (how's that for absurd optimism in the face of hardening scientific evidence?).

Who knows what the future will actually bring? Unfortunately, the increasing power of science to record, analyze and predict grows with efficiency each passing decade, making what was a wholly opaque picture to generations before, merely murky where undeniable trends can be factually noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great read
Those that fail to learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Fascism
Coming to a country near you, brought to you by a bigger and scarier nation if you don't agree with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. But, haven't we become less fascist in the ensuing three years?
Um, no, we've become even more fascist. It's fucking terrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvMyPorsche Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hmmmm
Something to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC