Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Campaign Contributor Faces Tax Woes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 10:43 AM
Original message
Clinton Campaign Contributor Faces Tax Woes


Clinton's Campaign Contributor Facing Tax Trouble
Source Washington Post (By John Solomon and Matthew Mosk)
Email this page
Save this page to your local hard disk!
Print this page
When Controversy Follows Cash
Some Fundraisers With Legal Issues Slip Through Campaigns' Vetting
<A HREF="http://a.tribalfusion.com/h.click/ajmxB45UQ2VUJGWmjXPabRQVvNPHjr1dBxVPbw3sJ50UMLUAaq46reRmbF3t3O0H3JmdPO4mU04GjeUVJ8UcJiPP3oUWFVWr7P3U2nVannVTU8QqJFSGJZaPr6mPW3cUGQ5RsyAioJmP8/http://www.education-advancement.com/colleges/uopol/newStep1uopolv3?mediaId=682496&sourceId=tfuop&siteId=15801027865284" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC= WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=250 BORDER=0></A>
Sant S. Chatwal, an Indian American businessman, has helped raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaigns, even as he battled governments on two continents to escape bankruptcy and millions of dollars in tax liens.

The founder of the Bombay Palace restaurant chain, Chatwal is one of a growing number of fundraisers in the 2008 presidential campaign whose backgrounds have prompted questions about how much screening the candidates devote to their "bundlers" while they press to raise record amounts.

Chatwal's case reached from his native India to New York City. The IRS pursued him for approximately $4 million in unpaid business taxes, while New York state placed a lien seeking more than $5 million in taxes. He forfeited a building to New York City on which he was delinquent on property taxes and was sued by federal regulators seeking to recoup millions of dollars in loans from a failed bank where he served as a director.

Across the ocean, three Indian banks forced him into U.S. bankruptcy, and he was charged with bank fraud. He was out on bond when he showed up in India in 2001 during a visit by his longtime friend Bill Clinton.

Yet none of the legal and financial woes -- occasionally touched on in American or Indian newspapers or highlighted by political opponents -- raised red flags inside Hillary Clinton's fundraising operation. Chatwal recently said he plans to help raise $5 million from Indian Americans for Clinton's presidential bid.

Asked whether anything in Chatwal's background caused concerns about his activities on behalf of the campaign, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer answered, "No." He declined last week to be more specific, saying only that major fundraisers are routinely vetted "through publicly available records."

Rajen Anand, a longtime friend of Chatwal and another Clinton fundraiser, said the campaign encourages strict vetting for fundraisers. "They advise me to be very careful not to associate the campaign with people where there is something wrong," he said.

Anand said, however, that Chatwal may have slid through any vetting, no matter how vigorous, because of his longtime friendship with the Clintons. The Clintons maintained a close association with Chatwal; both attended one of his sons' weddings in 2002, and the former president attended another son's wedding in 2006.

http://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=090907021214
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't you give it up...
People who have their minds made up on a candidate aren't going to change every time some starts to swiftboat another candidate.

It is odd that the Edwards supporters, the Hillary supporters aren't constantly and ever lastingly posting bashing remarks about your candidate. Obama. I guess it is because the Edwards and Hillary candidates are focused on the real culprits the republicans and not fellow democrats. I bet that if they really wanted to they could start and post stuff about him all day long. But they have more class, and they don't want to degrade a fellow democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC