Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think you all need to realize that Larry Craig did NOT cheat on his wife

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:40 AM
Original message
I think you all need to realize that Larry Craig did NOT cheat on his wife
Vitter got caught pay for sex yes but paying for sex with women. He DID cheat on his wife there is no doubt about that.

Craig's had to do with men but he didn't actually do a sexual act

Craig didn't last a week once it got out.

You can't have a clearer picture of their hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. A married man trolling for sex with men isn't cheating? I beg to differ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:44 AM
Original message
i beg to differ, too. gender makes no difference, imo.
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 11:47 AM by ellenfl
he didn't get caught having sex . . . this time. i have no doubt his cruising was successful in the past.

the point of it all is not the sex, per se, but the hypocrisy and, for his family, the cheating.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think his point is
that the particular incidents -

Vitter - heterosexual sex with prostitute
Craig - solicitation of homosexual sex (but no actual sex) .

Vitter's still there. Craig's outta there.

What's the glaring difference?

Het vs. same sex

Hatred against gays is alive and well. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleVet Donating Member (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. What's the glaring difference?
Democratic governor vs. repuke governor.

The (R) gets to appoint Craig's replacement. The (D) would have appointed Vitter's replacement, and the repukes would have lost another seat (prior to the 2008 elections when they will lose a lot of additional seats.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. ok - another good point -
but these ARE republicans we're, talking about.

And what about the "outrage" and "media' factor - surely that had nothing to do with who the gov is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. DING DING DING! Mzteris, you're our grand prize winner!
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 12:45 PM by rocknation
Vitter...sex with prostitute
Craig...(...no actual sex).
Vitter's still there. Craig's outta there.
What's the glaring difference?


According to the Rethugs, the difference is that Craig been charged and convicted; Vitter hasn't. Okay, then--how do they explain BILL CLINTON not being charged or convicted of "actual" sex, but not letting that stop them from trying to get HIM outta there? Technically, what Vitter did IS worse than what Craig did--but that's okay because Vitter DIDN'T GET CAUGHT BY THE POLICE?

:crazy:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Do you really think Craig was not successful in the past
That this just happened to be his first (and last) time trolling stalls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. of course not -
but we're talking "facts in evidence" here, not strictly conjecture, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. He didn't actually have sex
by any stretch of the imagination. Yes he was clearly looking for it and admitted to such but he didn't actually have sex of any kind or form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. He didn't admit to anything
Where did you get that?

You think this is the first time he went in a bathroom and tapped his feet?

I don't know why people are defending this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Do you think this was his first attempt at a toilet sex encounter?
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 12:10 PM by niceypoo
The man knew the signal codes. How many hundreds of times did he engage in this before he got caught? It's ignorant to think it was a one time thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SacredCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I agree....
If it all went down as the officer described, he sounded pretty well-versed in the "etiquitte" to me. I don't do such things, but know quite a few guys that do (for reasons I don't fathom in this day and age). 30-plus years ago, I can maybe cut some slack but not now.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I just don't know any guys (straight, gay, or anywhere in between) that, when sitting in a public restroom stall for its intended purpose, would allow their foot to slide into the next stall. Personally, I wish the dividers went all the way to the floor. And who picks up things on a filthy public restroom floor?? I mean, BESIDES 3-year-olds??? I dropped a dollar bill in a not-so-clean stall once, and there it stayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Being "unfaithful" is being "unfaithful"....
...no matter what the sex of the other person is.

Of course Craig cheated on his wife....just soliciting someone else for a sexual encounter ~~ whether it takes place or not ~~ in and of itself is NOT being faithful.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are we going to devine again what constitutes sexual activity?
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 11:46 AM by hlthe2b
That's so 1990s, isn't it? LOL

But, I must agree with those saying that engaging in any sexual activity outside marriage is, in my mind, adultery.

I do agree with your point that this double standard being promulgated with respect to Craig versus Vitter is based on hate and rampant homophobia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. What, like with my Canadian girlfriend
I don't think that anyone would really think that Craig "got any" that day in Minneapolis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. yes? What's your Canadian girlfriend think of the subject?


But, no, I agree, Craig did not get "lucky" in any sense of the word that day in Minneapolis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Not that day, sure.
How about the day before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I've got no double standard. Vitter should be gone, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. No, the double standard is on the part of the REPUGS...
clearly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. larry craig is a lying hypocrite.
it stretches the bounds of reality to believe this was the first time and he just somehow recently learned all of the codes to cruise the restrooms.
no. he is experienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes I know but we don't have any proof of it
We have proof and a guilty plea on this one incident.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
40. he was charged, he pled guilty. that is proof.
he could have gone to court. he knew he was guilty. anyone with any sense knows he did it and it sure doesnt seem like the first time.
he is a lying POS bastard with no remorse, no morals and no conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think that the point is ... what I would do to my partner/spouse ..
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 11:51 AM by Maat
in this case, my husband, if I caught him doing what Larry Craig did ... and it wouldn't be pretty.

On edit:
I agree that Larry's just a big, ol' typical Rethuglican hypocrite; and, it's good he's out of office BECAUSE of his disgusting voting record.

I'm Vice President of my local PFLAG (Parents, Family, Friends of Lesbians and Gays), and my GLBT friends have been giving quite an education on how it feels to be GLBT during this 'Craig scandal.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oh yes
That would be "awkward" to say the least but I meant in terms of how the two were treated within their party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes, I reminded my pals that it wasn't me trying to get Craig to resign ..
at least re the 'scandal.' It was a bunch of bigoted Rethuglicans playing to their Religious Ultra-right base. That's my humble opinion, anyway.

I'm glad he's gone from Congress, however (hateful man).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Personally I think the GOP was ready and willing to throw him under the bus
In large part I think it was a mulligan for the Foley incident last fall.

They played the Foley incident very poorly this time they wanted to respond quickly and decisively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Idaho Rep Gov
You can make it all about a double-standard if you want; but it's much more about power.

And you can minimize and rationalize bathroom sex all you want - the majority of Americans will always find it repulsive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Indeed.
Craig's replacement will be a Rep. Vitter's replacement would be a Dem. Nothing about hate. Just about power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. He never cheated, but somehow knew all the covert codes for
establishing a sexual assignation in a restroom.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that Craig
never successfully managed to solicit sex from a man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. heterosexual adultery is forgivable... IF you are a republican


homosexual infidelity is never forgivable...

democrats don't believe in God and do not pray for forgiveness so we are never forgivable... straight or gay...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I wonder if David Vitter got down on his knees & prayed forgiveness in his diapers?
"Dear Lord, please help me overcome my diaper sex fetish!":rofl:

I wonder if his wife put him on the potty, so to speak?
:rofl:

(David Vitter's penchant for kinky diaper sex never gets old, to me, anyway!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. wouldn't have anything to do with the party of the governor for each state...
the republicans are probably giving him the benefit of the doubt because incontinence is an ailment.... wouldn't have anything to do with the party of the governor for each state... or the orientation...





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Vitter

"Same-sex marriage

Vitter believes strongly that marriage is a sacred vow between a man and a woman. In 2003, Vitter proposed to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same sex marriages.<13> In 2004, he said, "This is a real outrage. The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history...We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts’s values."<14> In June 2006, he said "I don't believe there's any issue that's more important than this one ... I think this debate is very healthy, and it's winning a lot of hearts and minds. I think we're going to show real progress."<15> In 2006, he told The Times-Picayune, “I’m a conservative who opposes radically redefining marriage, the most important social institution in human history.”<16>

In October 2005, at a Lafayette Parish Republican Executive Committee luncheon, Vitter compared gay marriage to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which came through the same geographical areas. Vitter said "It's the crossroads where Katrina meets Rita. I always knew I was against same-sex unions." <17>...

D.C. Madam controversy...

...Maier said that Vitter "was not a freak. He was not into anything unusual or kinky or weird," and that he favored one prostitute in particular, Wendy Cortez,...

In May 1999, Vitter replaced Congressman Bob Livingston after Livingston resigned due to an adultery scandal.<1><37><16> Vitter said about Livingston's decision to resign, "It's obviously a tremendous loss for the state .... I think Livingston's stepping down makes a very powerful argument that Clinton should resign as well and move beyond this mess," referring to the Monica Lewinsky scandal of President Bill Clinton.<38> In 2000, his wife, Wendy Vitter, commenting on the same scandal, said, "I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary. If he does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing, and it's not alimony, trust me," referring to the incident of Lorena Bobbitt severing the penis of her husband and to Clinton's wife, Hillary Clinton.<37>

Reaction

While the Lousiana state Republican Party offered guarded support,<39> national Republicans offered forgiveness.<40> <40> The liberal magazine, The Nation, predicted that the Republican Party would be in a "forgiving mood" pointing out if Vitter did step down, Democratic Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco would likely appoint a Democrat to take Vitter's place until a special election took place, thus increasing Democratic control over the Senate.<41>"




DON'T CHOP OFF SEN. DAVID VITTER'S PENIS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A39J32gPxU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. David-Vitter-Diaper-Boy-cop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
27. He was caught looking to cheat...
same thing as cheating!

**Not to mention the rumors swirling for the last year, before he was caught, that he gave blow jobs to strangers in Union Station.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
30. Craig was arrested and pled guilty. Also the govenors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. uh . . . 'scuse me . . . but do you think this is the extent of his trolling activities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. You can't be convicted on general principle
Edited on Wed Sep-05-07 11:17 AM by underpants
okay Scott Peterson WAS convicted of basically being a slimeball but for the most part you have to be convicted (or plead) to a specific offense (specific time date occurence etc.)

No I have no doubt that he either had been successful or at least he had done that before but we don't KNOW about any other incidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. but Craig says he is not gay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renegade Six Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
37. It is cheating IMHO
Cheating on a spouse does not have to involve sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yup....

It is cheating.

And I'm sure when he and his wife are alone - without the glare of the media - she let's him know how she feels about it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC