Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Dysfunctional" House Intelligence Committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:34 PM
Original message
"Dysfunctional" House Intelligence Committee
"Dysfunctional" House Intelligence Committee

Remember "Duke" Cunningham? He's the California Republican Congressman who pled guilty to bribery related charges in late 2005, who is now serving an eight year prison sentence. He also sat on the House Intelligence committee, that among other responsibilities, makes recommendations for the "black" budget of classified federal national security spending.

Concerned that Cunninham's mercenary motivations may have corrupted the Intelligence committee's business, the committee authorized an internal investigation, which was completed last year. But here's the rub: Neither the former House intel committee chairman, Peter Hoekstra (R-MI), nor its current chairman, Silvestre Reyes (D-Tx), have agreed to release the investigation's findings.

Ranking Democrat Jane Harman released the investigation's executive summary last December - to howls of outrage from committee Republicans. Today, the Los Angeles Times reports, it got a look at the whole thing -- at least the 23 page unclassified version of the 50 page report.

Its conclusion: "The committee a dysfunctional entity that served as a crossroads for almost every major figure in the ongoing criminal probe by the Justice Department."

<snip>

More evidence if you needed it that the intelligence oversight process is broken, that some of the companies hired to protect the country won their contracts through graft and are unqualified, and that post 9/11 homeland security and intelligence are just a big new trough for some contractors with the added benefit (for them) of no public accountability because the contracts are classified. Evidence as well that the entrenched conflicts of interest continue, to the degree that the committee still will not agree to publicly release even the unclassified version of the report. And that's just the greed factor. Who's looking out that the intelligence and security are any more functional? The same conflicted people.

<more>

http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2007/07/48...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC