Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney's office now says President and VP are distinguished from "agencies" subject to oversight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:45 PM
Original message
Cheney's office now says President and VP are distinguished from "agencies" subject to oversight
Cheney Aide Explains Stance on Classified Material

By Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 27, 2007; Page A05
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/26/AR2007062602052.html?hpid=topnews

Vice President Cheney's office offered its first public written explanation yesterday for its refusal to comply with an executive order regulating the handling of classified material, arguing that the order makes clear that the vice president is not subject to the oversight system it creates for federal agencies.

In a letter to Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), Cheney chief of staff David S. Addington wrote that the order treats the vice president the same as the president and distinguishes them both from "agencies" subject to the oversight provisions of the executive order.

Addington did not repeat a separate argument that has been previously advanced by Cheney's office: that it is not strictly an executive branch agency but also shares legislative functions because the vice president presides over the Senate. That argument has drawn ridicule in recent days from Democrats and on late-night television.

Addington suggested in his letter that it was not necessary to rehash that dispute. "Given that the executive order treats the Vice President like the President rather than like an 'agency,' " he wrote, "it is not necessary in these circumstances to address the subject of any alternative reasoning, based on the law and the legislative functions of the vice presidency. . . ." The controversy arises from the revelation last week, by Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), that the vice president's office has not cooperated since 2003 with officials at the National Archives and Records Administration, who are charged with policing executive branch compliance with rules protecting classified information. In a letter to Cheney, Waxman wrote that the vice president's office had not responded to letters from the National Archives contesting its legal position.

<<snip>>

Kerry rejected Addington's arguments. "This legalistic response raises more questions than it purports to answer," the senator said in a statement. "I am far from satisfied with the response from David Addington, and ask again for the Vice President's office to plainly answer the question of whether he considers himself outside the realm of agency scrutiny, and what their office is doing to secure our nation's most privileged information."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. As I posted on an earlier thread, but is the VP office an "entity"?
Because the law refers to agencies yadda yadda, and all other "entities" yadda yadda. So is the VP office an entity? Or is it a time-space anomaly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's an eigenvalue in the asshole eigenspace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another cover their ass anyway possible move..
"...the executive order treats the Vice President like the President .."
Are they admitting they are really Co-presidents?
:puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. They really don't care how absurd
the position they put forward, all that will happen is the chattering classes, (that's everyone else outside the executive branch) will argue back and forth while nothing meaningful happens. Did you think they were kidding when they said they would create their own reality and leave us to study it it judiciously while they continue merrily raping us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bullshit...the founding fathers specifically set up checks and balances
because of the presidency


they did NOT ever want a form of king
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Holy shit. This is CYA to the nth degree. "Let me just explain more"
OMFG.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. While they are playing their bullshit games...American Soldiars
are dying, Iraquis are dying....our National Security is at risk...

If it Sounds like T-R-E-A-S-O-N and walks like T-R-E-A-S-O-N it must be T-R-E-A-S-O-N!


Every area of government has been intentially sabotaged by these idiots....and it's time to see them in cuffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Plus: $ 8, 808, 443, 410, 150. 36 (the real reason for their secrecy)
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 27 Jun 2007 at 07:11:10 AM GMT is:
$ 8, 808, 443, 410, 150. 36

An awful lot of these "numbers" end up (and away) in their options (and have-more's around 'em).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. simply put
the bushies operate ABOVE THE LAW and OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTITUTION

to them following the law or the constitution is "Option D" on a survey.. DOES NOT APPLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. "a wonderful academic question."
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 12:32 PM by dajoki
As Tony Snowjob put it...
White House press secretary Tony Snow said the president and vice president are not executive "agencies" and are therefore not covered under the executive order, but he stopped short of placing Cheney exclusively in the legislative branch. Snow He said the vice president has served "in an executive capacity delegated to him by the president" and noted that, constitutionally "there are no specified executive activities for the vice president," and that his role "is a wonderful academic question."
If you can figure that out you get the prize.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-cheney_wedjun26,1,6424091.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC