Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Politico largely ignored Giuliani-Iraq Study Group story, still flogging Edwards' haircuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:08 PM
Original message
Politico largely ignored Giuliani-Iraq Study Group story, still flogging Edwards' haircuts
Politico largely ignored Giuliani-ISG story, still flogging Edwards' haircuts
Media Matters for America
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:55pm EST

----
The Politico, which purports to cover "the politics of Capitol Hill and of the presidential campaign ... with enterprise, style, and impact," largely ignored a June 19 Newsday article reporting that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's (R) "membership on" the Iraq Study Group (ISG) "came to an abrupt end last spring after he failed to show up for a single official meeting of the group." By contrast, The Politico continues to report on former Sen. John Edwards' (D-NC) $400 haircuts and their effect on his presidential campaign.

Newsday reported on June 19 that Giuliani, rather than attend the ISG meetings, delivered speeches that earned him $300,000:

Rudolph Giuliani's membership on an elite Iraq study panel came to an abrupt end last spring after he failed to show up for a single official meeting of the group, causing the panel's top Republican to give him a stark choice: either attend the meetings or quit, several sources said.

Giuliani left the Iraq Study Group last May after just two months, walking away from a chance to make up for his lack of foreign policy credentials on the top issue in the 2008 race, the Iraq war.

He cited "previous time commitments" in a letter explaining his decision to quit, and a look at his schedule suggests why -- the sessions at times conflicted with Giuliani's lucrative speaking tour that garnered him $11.4 million in 14 months.

Giuliani failed to show up for a pair of two-day sessions that occurred during his tenure, the sources said -- and both times, they conflicted with paid public appearances shown on his recent financial disclosure. Giuliani quit the group during his busiest stretch in 2006, when he gave 20 speeches in a single month that brought in $1.7 million.

Journalist and blogger Joshua Micah Marshall discussed the story's significance in a June 19 entry to his Talking Points Memo weblog, writing: "So Rudy's running on terrorism and Iraq. But he got booted off a congressionally-mandated blue ribbon panel because he couldn't be bothered to show up for the meetings. It conflicted with his for-a-price speaking gigs. Like I said, it's the kind of story that ends campaigns." Indeed, the Politico has acknowledged that Giuliani is casting himself as "tough" on national security and terrorism. For instance, chief political columnist Roger Simon wrote in an April 26 article: "Giuliani, whose past positions on abortion, gun control and gay rights have made him anathema to some in his party, believes his tough stance on national defense and his post-Sept. 11 reputation as a fighter of terrorism will be his trump card with doubting Republicans."

The Politico, however, did not report on Giuliani's exit from the ISG. A search conducted by Media Matters for America revealed that the only attention the Politico gave the story were two short blog entries by senior political writers Jonathan Martin and Ben Smith. Acknowledging that he did not set out to report on the Giuliani-ISG story, Martin wrote on June 19: "Without asking for it, I received pushback from Rudy's camp on the Newsday story today which reports that Giuliani quit the Iraq Study Group after being told by James Baker to show up at the meetings or resign from the panel." Martin uncritically accepted the Giuliani campaign's "pushback":

Said a Giuliani campaign official:
"Once again, the paper wrote a story with little regard to the facts. The facts are these -- as someone considered a potential presidential candidate, the Mayor didn't want the group's work to become a political football. That, coupled with time constraints, led to his decision."


The sensitivity - as demonstrated by the shot at a news organization -- reflects the danger of the story. It's not just that he missed two sessions of the panel, but that he did so because he was giving paid speeches.
(...)
As Media Matters noted, Smith "broke" the Edwards haircut story in an April 16 blog entry, and the story was immediately seized upon by the media. Blogger Glenn Greenwald wrote that The Politico appeared to have an "obsession" with the story, noting that the publication referenced Edwards' haircuts at least eight times between April 16 and May 3, while eschewing other political news stories "of even marginal significance."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200706200002?f=h_topic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Politico, purveyor of right wing propaganda and totally unconcerned
with facts or the land of the free. Typical conservative outlet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Politico has squandered any credibility they began with. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ignore politico. They do not have this Party's best interests at heart.
TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Funded by Allbritton Dirty Money/BAE/BANDAR/RIGGS/Bush Uncle...
It was set up as an Attack Machine from the beginning. Big salaries for those "reporters" who don't mind getting "a little extra" easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I have no doubt.
We need to be very judicious when using anything they say as the truth. Maybe we shouldn't link to them without a backup llink or something... :shrug:

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Right wingers resent a hair stylist earning $400 for haircut but think ok for Giuliani to
get $300,000 for making a few speeches. Quite a double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. There is a double standard, but haircuts should not be what this election is about.
If we let anyone make it about that (esp in the MSM) we are aiding and abetting their committment to disinformation and infotainment. Hillary's hair costs more than $400, I'd be willing to bet, and she gets it done whenever she's on television. She probably has a hairdresser on staff. THAT'S NOT WRONG. The MSM would be getting on their backs for looking horrid or being cheapskates if they didn't spend the money to look good. It's a lose-lose situation as long as we continue to find the cost of haircuts more important than what they say on the ISSUES.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I remember many pundits from both sides bitching about
Edited on Thu Jun-21-07 08:56 AM by tblue37
how sloppy John Bolton's hair looked when he was being questioned by Congress. I also remember how Hillary was criticized for her no-nonsense, practical hairbands before Bill was elected president. I have no doubt that Hillary chose her earlier style for its ease of upkeep--as smart, hardworking women often do.

If Americans are going to be shallow enough to demand that politicians look like Hollywood stars with expensive stylists on call, then we can't very well complain when they turn to expensive stylists to help them achieve the required look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I think you are right about issues but I also think a candidate needs to reframe attacks
I think Clinton has gotten good at immediate response. If Edwards could have reframed the haircut issue as a worker issue it might have ended the controversy.

I didn't bother reading the details of the haircut story so I don't know if that was possible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. no change there
Their reporters are continuing the same blather they've always pushed. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. If I were in Washington, I'd be considering finding a cream pie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. We have already established Politico's right wing credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yep, and its no coincidence many Politico articles end up on Drudge. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC