Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pundit: Rudy's 9/11 Performance Gives Him Claim To "Combat Experience"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 05:02 PM
Original message
Pundit: Rudy's 9/11 Performance Gives Him Claim To "Combat Experience"


http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/may/29/pundit_rudys_9_11_performance_gives_him_claim_to_combat_experience

Pundit: Rudy's 9/11 Performance Gives Him Claim To "Combat Experience"
By Greg Sargent | bio

Okay, here's a bit more on this whole question of whether the media and pundits will aggressively point out that Rudy's performance on 9/11 does not in any way, shape or form constitute anything resembling national security experience.

A commenter below points to an astonishing moment on Keith Olbermann's May 16 show about the GOP debate that captures the dynamic perfectly. Olbermann's guest, pundit John Harwood, a senior writer for The Wall Street Journal and CNBC's chief Washington correspondent, offered the following on Rudy:

HARWOOD: Well look, Keith, I think those answers by both McCain and Giuliani help both men perhaps in the primary and in the general election for different reasons. McCain`s core message is toughness, and that I`m tough enough that I can go against my party on this issue. Why? Because I`ve been in combat. I`ve been tortured myself, as you mentioned.

Rudy Giuliani also has a bit of a claim to combat in a different way, because he was on the ground in 9/11.


Even allowing the speaker here a bit of oratory license, we nonetheless feel compelled to point it out: Rudy doesn't have combat experience. He doesn't have national security experience, either. He walked through the smoke and dust on 9/11 and held a bunch of press conferences at which he uttered a bunch of emotional and reassuring phrases. But the actual recovery effort he ran, while praised by some, has attracted a whole bunch of criticism, too.

Again: We're singling this punditry out because it's a reminder that if the media, and Rudy's rivals, cede him the aura of national security experience based on nothing more than the fact that he ran New York City on 9/11, he stands a much better chance of becoming President.

Update: And let's not forget NBC political director Chuck Todd's repeated assertion -- with no trace of irony -- that Rudy "owns 9/11."

Update II: Turns out Media Matters was way ahead of us on this, flagging it, you know, back when it happened.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Since when did Harwood become a mediawhore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. keep dreaming losers.
hes got more of a claim to espionage expertise with all of the cheating and sneaking hes done on his wives, girlfriends and mistresses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. He ran NYC on 9/11? When did he show up? During or after the bombing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think so.....................
Edited on Tue May-29-07 05:27 PM by Totally Committed
Not even CLOSE.

The closest he's ever come to "combat" is when he mouth-kissed Donald Trump while in drag, and didn't vomit afterward.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is this motherfucker SERIOUS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC