Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting observations by MSNBC's Chuck Todd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:20 PM
Original message
Interesting observations by MSNBC's Chuck Todd
Edited on Wed May-23-07 10:21 PM by Katzenkavalier
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18824957/

The other big news from this focus group, beyond the very positive initial response for Obama and Giuliani, is the very negative reaction they had toward Clinton. If these 12 folks are truly a cross-section of the electorate, then Hillary Clinton has a LOT of work to do. Eight of the 12 said they could not support her under any circumstance and seven of the 12 said she has the "furthest to go" in winning their trust. The word "cold" was tossed around a few times by a Democrat and an independent member of the panel. In fact, when asked to give one word or phrase that comes to mind when they heard her name, the only positive adjective used was "determined." The rest of the responses were negative. By the way, Hart asked for adjectives on Bill Clinton and the responses were just as negative, with only a couple offering a positive expression.

Obama clearly was the "hot" candidate as far as this group was concerned. He was the candidate a plurality wanted to meet with personally -- more so than Giuliani or Clinton. And when asked, early on, (before information on each candidate was introduced), who they wanted as the next POTUS (President of the United States), Obama came out on top, with 5 votes, compared to 3 for Giuliani, 2 for Clinton and 1 each for McCain and Edwards. When asked what word or phrase comes to mind when Obama was mentioned by name, just one negative was used - "inexperienced." The rest of the adjectives were positive - "charismatic, smart, articulate, potential, independent and excitable" (It seemed to me the person was trying to say exciting).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Okay
Nice of those 12 people to determine the next President. Tell them thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Better 12 average people than a handful of millionaires. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm checking cspan's schedule. I want to watch this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. So 10 out of 12 had negative views of Bill Clinton...
Yet he has a 65% favorable rating with the public...

Yeah, sounds like a real representative group there...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton is as stale as last week's meatloaf...

Save Elmer!!

I just thought I'd check and make sure you're still out there taking us "not-quite-Hillaryites" to the woodshed -->

I dunno who's up or who's down because I don't believe in polls this early out.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. And what do you suppose FOCUS group stands for?
Damn, this could be a separate thread, but would probably end up being deleted by the mods. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gee....between politico and msnbc, I'm shocked.
I guess 15 years of anti-Clinton messages from the Republican corporate media eventually gets the desired result. Or else, this observation by Todd is completely meaningless. Hillary may not be the favorite Democrat in the primary field, but I guarantee that she will be better than any of the losers offered up in the Republican Party. If she wins the primaries and is our nominee, I think she'll be unbeatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC