Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress' vote on Iraq war is only a prelude

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 06:49 AM
Original message
Congress' vote on Iraq war is only a prelude
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-assess30apr30,0,5939734.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Congress' vote on Iraq war is only a prelude
A September progress report on the troop buildup could make things a lot harder for Bush and Republicans.
By Doyle McManus, Times Staff Writer
April 30, 2007

WASHINGTON — On the surface, there's not much suspense about what happens next in the battle between President Bush and Democratic lawmakers over the war in Iraq. Bush says he will veto the $124-billion war spending bill passed by both houses of Congress last week that requires him to begin withdrawing troops this year; when he does, Democrats say, they will protest and then send him the money without binding conditions.

That noisy script, however, is just a prelude to a debate — under conditions likely to be more difficult for Bush — that could turn into a decisive moment for the course of the war.

To buy time for his buildup of more than 28,000 troops to show results, Bush asked his commander in Iraq, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, to deliver a progress report to the nation in early September.

That helped stave off Republican defections as Congress debated whether to impose a timetable for troop withdrawals. But it also established September as a deadline for clearer military and political progress in Iraq, a tactical concession for a White House that long has refused to accept any benchmarks or timetables for evaluating the war, now 4 years old.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. LA Times should also do a story on what "sectarian violence"
now means. Of course the President, backed by his hand picked sock puppets like Petraeus (beTRAYEDus) is going to report that the surge has been a wonderful success (if only the biased media would REPORT it), sectarian violence has already dropped significantly BECAUSE THEY NO LONGER COUNT THE VICTIMS OF IEDs or CAR BOMBS!!!! Only shooting victims and the beheaded are counted NOW.

And since the surge has worked, why victory over the evil terrorists will be just around the corner... maybe in another year or so.

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC