Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dismissal of Wilkes' indictments sought (because Lam sped the process up?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 10:19 AM
Original message
Dismissal of Wilkes' indictments sought (because Lam sped the process up?)
Grasping at straws?

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070424-9999-1m24wilkes.html

Dismissal of Wilkes' indictments sought

By Kelly Thornton
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

April 24, 2007

DOWNTOWN SAN DIEGO – Lawyers for former Poway defense contractor Brent Wilkes yesterday asked a judge to dismiss indictments stemming from the Randy “Duke” Cunningham scandal because the government deliberately and illegally disclosed grand jury secrets to the media.

Wilkes' attorney, Mark Geragos, also alleged in documents filed in federal court that the leaks were part of a campaign by former U.S. Attorney Carol Lam to use Wilkes and other defendants as “pawns” in a “political squabble” with bosses at the Justice Department who wanted her fired.

Geragos contended that Lam wanted the indictments to happen before the Bush administration forced her from office. The indictments were issued Feb. 13; Lam left two days later.

“The United States Attorney used the leaks to create a public atmosphere that compelled the grand jury to return indictments and present (the Justice Department) with a fait accompli, a gesture of defiance by Carol Lam as she was forced out of office,” Geragos wrote.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. All the more reason for congress to investigate....
I think once ALL the facts become REALLY public, we'll see exactly who was acting inappropriately...and guess what? It wasn't Lam's fault she uncovered a nest of snakes.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. My Gawd, Isn't it IMPEACHMENT yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. A desperate move that hurts Bush & Co. more than it helps Wilkes.
It certainly doesn't help the administration for
Geragos to link Lam's firing to the bribery scandal
she was prosecuting.

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC