Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would a good Attorney General know every 93 of his USA's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:48 PM
Original message
Would a good Attorney General know every 93 of his USA's
What would be the qualifications required for the US Attorney General?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, and it isn't rocket science.
How many of us know a majority of the Senators and/or Congresscritters??? I do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Same here... I could recognize by face who it is or possibly the state
Or could state the name of the Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only ones
the US AG would be required to be familiar with are the ones who are doind their jobs in a non partisan way. Can't have any of that. They must all be political hatchet men/women for BushCo. Anything else should definitely cause alarm bells to go off.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gonzo's never managed a person in his life
much less any kind of company or organization.

That much is very obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Except in the case of cleaning up george w's personal messes.
He HAS managed that. Still doesn't qualify him for anything legit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. yes, I think he should
especially if he's had conversations or meeting with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Know the creds of a USA prosecuting major federal corruption?
If he doesn't, he should be fired just for that.

Credulity may be stretchy but nothing is elastic enough to make me believe that the Lam prosecution of Cunningham and then Lewis wasn't a MAJOR concern for the White House, the Republican Party, and the Party's chief rep at the DOJ, Alberto Gonzales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC