Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can the President delegate his pleasure?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:24 AM
Original message
Can the President delegate his pleasure?
Cuz if he can't, then the whole mess ultimately goes right back to his lap, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's delegated his pleasure to Jeff Gannon from time to time.
I'll bet he really enjoys that! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton tried it, and look where it got him
Perjury and all that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. actually, it was Congress that did the delegating
Even prior to the Patriot Act provision changing the interim appointment of US Attorneys, the law was that the AG could make an interim appointment. The difference was that it was time-limited to 120 days (although there is some case law suggesting that the same appointment could be made over and over to extend the 120 days) or the nomination of a permanent replacement by the president (in the absence of a pres appointment or a new 120 day appointment, the district court could appoint an interim, again without senate confirmation).

Ultimately, then, it is up to the pres to fire someone, but the authority to appoint has been delegated. As a technical matter, no one was 'fired' -- they were asked to resign by the AG. I don't see any problem with that. If any of them had refused to submit their resignations, then any "firing" of them would have to be done by the president. I don't think he could delegate that authority, although I can't swear to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Recommended for greatest title & great point!
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 11:39 AM by The Count
Hard to dodge this one! he should have learned from the Rummy debacle that his "support" is not unassailable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Like maybe hiring somebody
to screw Laura?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC