Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Getting Serious About the "I" Word (John Nichols for The Nation)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:56 AM
Original message
Getting Serious About the "I" Word (John Nichols for The Nation)
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:11 AM by marmar
BLOG | Posted 03/27/2007 @ 05:05am
Getting Serious About the "I" Word


Former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough had me on his MSNBC show tonight to talk about impeachment.

It was smart, civil discussion that treated the prospect of impeaching the president as a serious matter.

Scarborough took the lead in suggesting that Bush's biggest problem might be that Republicans in the House and Senate who -- fearful of the threat Bush poses to their political survival -- do not appear to be rallying 'round the president. The host's sentiments were echoed by two other guests, columnist Mike Barnicle and Salon's Joan Walsh.

The impetus for the show was Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel's ongoing discussion of the impeachment prospect -- Hagel's not quite a supporter of sanctioning Bush, more a speculator about the prospect -- and a new column by Robert Novak that suggests Bush has dwindling support within the congressional wing of the GOP.

Speaking about impeachment on ABC's "This Week," Hagel said, "Any president who says 'I don't care' or 'I will not respond to what the people of this country are saying about Iraq or anything else' or 'I don't care what the Congress does, I am going to proceed' -- if a president really believes that, then there (are) ways to deal with that."
....snip....

If the president wants to get in a fight with Congress over how to read the Constitution, it appears that the people will back Congress. And that backing is what will begin to restore the backbones of House members who, despite Pelosi's attempts to quiet talk of impeachment, are getting more and more intrigued by the prospect of holding this president to account. .....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&pid=179501




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. NOM! The "I" word seeing the light of day! I hope many more journalists
start 'writing' it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup. It does seem to creep into MSM discussions a little more each day....
End this 6-year nightmare with an exclamation point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TerdlowSmedley Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. While I disagree with Scarborough's politics, he does seem to be
about the only, and I do mean only, conservative commentator who is not a complete dick. He strikes me as level-headed (if wrong) and relatively even-handed and does at least appear to think for himself, in lieu of simply screeching from the Karl Rove songbook. Seems like an okay guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "conservative commentator who is not a complete dick"
LOL....Sad but true, but that's the pathetic standard when it comes to conservative commentators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. I Have Not Been in Favor of Impeaching Over the Iraq War
But the attorney firings are worth going to the mat over. If the adminstration continues to lie, stonewall, and take the fifth, this one should go all the way to the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed. That issue seems to present a much more solid case for impeachment.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC