Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To all Political Advisers here at DU....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:23 PM
Original message
To all Political Advisers here at DU....
I find it extremely reprehensible to put down people that voted for Nader, the person they wanted for president, instead of Gore/""""LIEBERMAN"""".

I hope that everyone here will always vote their conscience instead of playing political manipulation games that some find so important.

I encourage everyone to vote for who they WANT TO WIN.

Blame Nader people can F'off.



(for the record I didn't vote for Nader)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why?
There is a very special place in hell for people who voted for Nader in 2000. Shit, even Nader should understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or do you mean the people who didn't vote for great patriot LIEBERMAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. As in GORE/Lieberman.
Wow, you are right. What a disaster that would have been.

Aren't you glad you didn't get Lieberman and instead got Cheney?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Merely pointing out who would have been running the country.
Comparing Cheney and Lieberman

At least Cheney doesn't put on a front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Gore would've been president
That's all that matters to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I seriously doubt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I meant Gore headed the ticket
not Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. ...and Lieb the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Gore would have been running the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. No. Lieberman would have been running the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. What are you talking about?
You make absolutely no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Bush not running country. Cheney running country
Gore not running country. Lieberman running country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Right because Nader said Bush and Gore were exactly the same so
Gore would have governed just like Bush has.

What color is the sky in your crazy-assed world?:eyes:

Really pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. BTW I could care less about Nader. I've never been a supporter
But I don't buy the political argument. I think its really counter productive.

And once again Gore would have been the figurehead and Lieberman would have probably found a way into war with Iraq. If you want to make predictions so will I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. "At least Cheney doesn't put on a front."
No, Cheney has substituted his fantasy of the reality on the ground in Iraq for reality. If that isn't "putting up a front," what is it? Psychotic hallucinations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Last time I checked Cheney's approval rating was about 17%.
I don't think too many Americans are confused about the fact that DICK is a DICK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. At Last We Agree on Something n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Congratulations, Nader Voters
Edited on Sat Feb-17-07 07:28 PM by rwenos
Your colleagues in New Hampshire, Tennessee and Florida gave us GEORGE W. BUSH in the White House.

Hope you're enjoying your "idealogical purity."

Did you expect hearts and flowers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Really! I would seriously take a look at Sandra Day O'conner and Diebold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Them Too, But . . .
If Ralph Nader wasn't such a solipsist, navel-gazing selfish jerk, Al Gore would be President.

Sorry, Mate. Nader was a great investigative lawyer and journalist. But to say he did not DIRECTLY cost Al Gore the presidency in 2000 is simply self-delusion.

Liberalism means seeing the world as it is. Not as you wish it to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Speaking of delusions, maybe you have an infallible power to know
Edited on Sat Feb-17-07 07:52 PM by greyhound1966
the outcome of alternate history, but those of us not living in an institution may be dubious about your claim to know how things might have worked out. Perhaps you would deign to enlighten us?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Damn Boy/Girl! You got a point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. What I know
is, to be honest, what I recall of the voting results in New Hampshire, Florida and Tennessee. I recall Nader's vote exceeded the margin of "victory" Bush claimed in New Hampshire and Tennessee. I won't dignify the stick-up in Florida by calling it a Bush "victory."

If someone can show me how those Nader votes, if even half of them had gone to Gore, would NOT swing the outcome of the election in those states, I will stand corrected.

There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. Also elections in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. Ok.
I don't buy that argument.

And I still believe playing this political shame game is precisely what the two party system finds ideal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Whether you rmemory is correct or not (and I honestly don't know either), you
are engaging in an unrealistic binary scenario with your supposition that all, or most, Nader votes would have fallen to Gore. Even in the supposed two party system we are shackled with, elections are never simply yes/no this candidate or that candidate, there are multiple possibilities and we will never know what would have happened.

As for 2000, we do know that Nader repeatedly stated, throughout his candidacy, that if Gore would address his single issue, the elimination of corporate welfare and disproportional representation, he would drop out. The didn't and neither did he.

As I've pointed out in other posts here, maybe it would be more productive to spend our time looking into the potential weaknesses and vulnerabilities of our own party, and not looking for a scapegoat to blame for our own inadequacies. The fact is that the Gore/Lieberman campaign was an anemic, uninspired, put-up job done by incompetent party hacks, the traitor Donna Brazile foremost among them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh Boy
I agree with you, but I hope you realize you've just lit a powder keg.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I've been pissed off about this crap attitude for a while. Screw them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is Nader running?
Edited on Sat Feb-17-07 07:30 PM by Lastlaughin08
.....and if so, toward which border?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
57. Self delete
Edited on Sat Feb-17-07 08:30 PM by Lastlaughin08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ralph is what HE is, a self centered spoiler who is LARGELY respondsible.........
for the state of where 'WE' are TODAY. I'm NOT bashing ANY voters, ONLY the reprehensible Ralph Nader HIMSELF!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Obviously untrue. Looking back now I think maybe LIEBERMAN was about as good a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Why are you do hung up on Lieberman?
He was the VP candidate, not the presidential candidate. Plus, Nader promised not to get on the ballot in swing states, such as Florida, and broke that promise. He's an egocentric fool who's made himself a laughingstock. Even he Green Party wants nothing to do with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Last thing I heard was Demos weren't lining up to see Lieberman Speak. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm pretty sure telling a select group of folks at DU to F'off
is against DU rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Tilting at Windmills, Too
I wonder at your motivation. What did you EXPECT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Why? Should I say go to Hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Have a take; don't suck
With apologies to Jim Rome. Wouldn't that make more sense than setting off a flame war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Internally I have a major issue with people saying "voting your Conscience" is wrong
If so it is also wrong to vote only out political game playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. So That's Your Issue
The two-party system sucks . . . except when it buffers this country against extremists of either ideological side. Maybe you have a personal issue with life forcing choices on you. Well, got any kids? Got any other family responsibilities? Got rent to pay every month? Life is made up of compromises. Nader's normative bleat "but I should be trying to get as many votes as possible" is the whimper of a demanding child, who wants to skip the broccoli but still have ice cream for dessert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Not in the least. I am willing to ask questions about the nature of voting and democracy.
The answer I get is being brave enough to vote your view is true political freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. And I and the others here are willing to answer them (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. What was the question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. The One You Asked . . .
. . . i.e., why do Democrats blame Ralph Nader for the Bush presidency.

My friend, you can cut this any way you want, and make any argument you want speculating about whether the Nader voters were new voters, or that they may have not voted at all. That is pure speculation also. The fact is that most Nader voters were much more sympathetic to Al Gore than to George Bush. And Nader himself said he'd rather have Bush win, and get a big backlash at the next election (GREAT idea, that!), than have Al Gore be president. My only point, after all the carping and fencing back and forth, is that Nader cost Gore the election. Nader and his supporters should be honest enough with themselves to admit that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Could care less what Nader said. I did not vote for him.
On the other hand maybe we should really be blaming the Libertarians. If they had voted for Gore then perhaps we would be better off.

BTW you missed the main question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. Nader was a political opponent of Democrats, why should he be treated like an ally?
Gore/LIEBERMAN was a FAR BETTER TICKET THAN BUSH/CHENEY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
44. I never said that nor that I am a party line corporate democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. I'm a practical democrat, lable yourself as you wish.
Edited on Sat Feb-17-07 08:23 PM by mzmolly
In the words of the great Molly Ivins "Vote with your heart in the primary, and vote with your head in the general election." (paraphrased) ;) But, that's where I'm at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. And thats fine but if someone doesn't agree with you quit shaming them into thinking that
our circumstances are their fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. I think anyone who played a role in assisting in a Bush win should take responsibility.
Repentant Nader voters are forgiven. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Did you do everything you possible could within your power to keep Bush out
of office?

Have you done everything you can to impeach him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Yes on the first,
and I'm not in a position to impeach him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. My point is: Why not blame my mom; she still has no clue. Voted for Gore!
Edited on Sat Feb-17-07 09:02 PM by Flabbergasted
Or i.e. your greedy uncle. Or anyone who is ignorant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Did your Mom lie about Gore?
If she did consider her "blamed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. That was funny...Thanks. I'm trying to say we should not totally block off the
idea of voting out of conscience. Its a really important thing. I don't buy the blame game. I think its garbage and silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
41. I'm locking this thread
An exteme group attack is contained in the original post .

proud patriot Moderator
Democratic Underground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. An exteme group attack is contained in the original post .?
Sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
43. thought this thread was locked??? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Why not have this discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. just saw the message that the thread was locked by admin....
thought it strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. I know and I'm saying we should have this discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. i have no problem with that. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #45
64. Same reason we don't discuss why we shouldn't "blame Bush?"
That's my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. soft restraints?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. Post 41 says it is locked but I guess not.
Edited on Sat Feb-17-07 08:24 PM by Pirate Smile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Let us be candid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
66. Whoops Lock take 2
the original post contains an extreme group attack.

proud patriot Moderator
democratic Underground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC