Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush uses Joe McCarthy's slur in formal address to Congress dominated by those insulted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:56 AM
Original message
Bush uses Joe McCarthy's slur in formal address to Congress dominated by those insulted
President's Sin of Omission?
Dropped Syllable in Speech Riles Democrats
By Libby Copeland
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 25, 2007; Page C01


President Bush with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during Tuesday's State of the Union address, which included a fateful nod to "the Democrat majority." (By Rich Lipski -- The Washington Post)

The president in his State of the Union address Tuesday night left out a tiny little suffix that means a whole lot to some people. He did it so subtly you could have missed it. Just a little "-ic." What's in an "-ic"?

Bush started the speech on a bipartisan note, honoring the first Madam Speaker, Democrat Nancy Pelosi, and calling on the country to come together.

Then: "I congratulate the Democrat majority," he said, dropping the last two letters from "Democratic."

Bush does this a lot, and while it's hard to say if the omission was intentional in this instance, it is a semantic tactic that's been part of Republican warfare for decades. It's a little thing, a means of needling the opposition by purposefully mispronouncing its name, and of suggesting that the party on the left is not truly small-"d" democratic. The president's pronunciation was all the more striking because it was apparently not what Bush was supposed to say. The prepared speech that the White House distributed beforehand retained that precious "-ic."...

***

Dick Armey was fond of saying "Democrat Party." Commie-hunting Sen. Joseph McCarthy even used the phrase half a century ago. Bush used it Tuesday night even as he was calling for politicians to "cross that aisle," even in the context of a formal address and even as he addressed a Congress dominated by those he was insulting....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/24/AR2007012402469.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. You expect George to understand grammar?
Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No but he could at least read the statements as prepared.
It was an intentional shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. You expect George to read a teleprompter without error?
It was not an intentional shot. It was knee-jerk, the sloppy habit of a sloppy mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Read? You expect a chimp to read? :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Bush I intentionally mispronounced Sadaam's name.
One way means a shoe, or sole of a shoe and the other way is the correct way. They did it intentionally, though, honestly, I never really committed to memory the correct way to spell his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Once again a DUer invokes the "stupid meme" to let Bush** off the hook.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. So it was Joe McCarthy's slur originally, eh? That provides the best response to this yet.
Simply invoke that connection whenever it's said....

"Spoken like a true McCarthyite"

"I see the GOP is still the party of Joe McCarthy"

"Quoting Joe McCarthy? How appropriate, you're a lot like him"

etc.

Nice find, I was unaware that expression started with him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Great idea, thanks!
I will definitely use those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. a duer her had a great suggestion -- some time back -- please note the spelling.
the republick party.

just start referring to it -- especially in writing as the republick party -- many here already do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Repiglickans!!!
Actually, I am DELIGHTED at this article, because they're FINALLY talking about it.

Amazing what having the majority can do....all of those reporters are busy sucking up in order to curry favor with people they'll need off-the-record quotes from!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I won't shorten their name to the honorable word: "republic". (nt)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. There's always "republi-CON" ('cause all they offer is a CON JOB!!!)
Edited on Thu Jan-25-07 05:32 AM by calimary
Emphasis on the CON part.

I think fighting fire with fire is fair at this point. Have we ever tried that tactic before? Or has it always been to proceed as though one didn't hear it, to ignore it (because then it'll surely go away, or because one would rather not dignify such a slur by responding to it). Yeah. And how's that workin' for ya? How'd it work for John Kerry - to keep his powder dry while being swiftboated for days?

I prefer that we throw it back in their faces. Give 'em a taste of their own medicine. See how they like it. And remind them that we'll say their party's name correctly when they do likewise with ours.

Besides, as my husband would say - "WE say what the name of our party is. NOT THEM!!!" They don't have a horse in this race. The name of OUR party is what WE say it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. please note: republicK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Better yet, spell it as 'republickkk' party -- n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. republech, blech for short n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. Sam Seder uses Rape-Publican.
It sounds a bit more subtle than it looks - but how accurate! The party that rapes the public.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Interesting that though this is only coming into corp media discussion
*after* the elections - even while those same writings always refer to how long the petty insult has been hurled.

I am glad to see these articles and columns showing up in various outlets - as it starts making the insulters look petty. Esp. in this case - it wasn't in the text, and he used it while ostensibly calling for bipartisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe Yes, Maybe No....
This is after all a guy with considerable trouble doing the "public speaking thing"... It may have been deliberate, but he fumbles so many things, gosh it's hard to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. I prefer to call them the Republikud Party n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. He is a Bully...the omission is intentional...imho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. remember to expect nothing other than mud slinging and pot shot throwing from the entire bush clan.
they don't know how to come up clean. ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. PUBLICANS=Vile tax collector of Roman times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. Why does Bush expect bipartisanship when he purposely slurs the Democratic Party?
Oh yeah, it's because he is a SOCIOPATH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. FINALLY
the media is picking up on this.

To use this in a SOTU speech, in the context of extending the olive branch, is absolutely disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. Simply Cons.
I've been calling them "Cons" since at least the 2004 campaign. Having to watch Bush LIVE! BREAKING NEWS! on the cables every time he got off the bus and passed gas made it very clear that he's a Con Man.

And as someone suggested yesterday, that way we have the Pros (Progressives) and Cons (Conservatives). :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. Good God -- Bush is such a f*cking asshole.
What a petulant little child.

This goes right along with him asking Webb, "How's your boy?".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC